I need to move one of the vacuum ports on the rear of the intake, would like to add a third, and I would like to remove some small "lips" where the tubes meet the intake plate. So in short I am going to be drilling a couple of holes, plugging one hole and a small amount of grinding. Whats the best way to wash out the intake afterwards to insure I don't have any shavings left when I install it? I am thinking about using my water hose followed by a good WD40 bath. Anyone have any suggestions or comments?
IP: Logged
01:32 PM
PFF
System Bot
fiero_silva Member
Posts: 1493 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Registered: Jun 2003
Here are some pics to help explain what I want to do.
you can see in this pic that the left vacuum port is blocking my fuel pressure gauge. I need to move it towards the top and alittle left. Then add one on the top right.
Here you can see the little lips I'm talking about on the side of the intake plate. (in all fairness to Troy and Francis, this was one of their earlier long runner intakes, one of the first if I remember correctly, I'm sure they have improved since this one was built. and they made me a great deal on it so I don't mind doing a little work to get what I want.)
Here is what I really like about this intake. Nice big opening for my DM bored TB.
IP: Logged
02:11 PM
Raydar Member
Posts: 40963 From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country. Registered: Oct 1999
I have the same situation with mine where the gasket meets the flanges. I figure that I'll just do whatever grinding I need to do, vacuum out whatever I can, then run water in through the runners and let it run out through the TB neck. Since I don't have to drill any holes in the plenum, I may just stuff paper towels into the runners. The trick will be getting them far enough down that I don't snag them with the grinder, but not so far that they can't be retrieved.
[This message has been edited by Raydar (edited 10-29-2006).]
IP: Logged
06:38 PM
Francis T Member
Posts: 6620 From: spotsylvania va. usa Registered: Oct 2003
Dont grind that spot ! Doing so will not be worth the risk of a vacuum leak. On some of the prototypes we had a problem welding the area between the runners that were close to each other and even added some welding inside. I doubt that you see see much of dif of any even on a dyno, so play it safe and let it be. As for that fitting, take it out and maybe put a 90 deg in there instead. Or prehpas change the fiiting on your fuel rail to a 90? BTW: is that for your fuel gauge?
IP: Logged
07:35 PM
Raydar Member
Posts: 40963 From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country. Registered: Oct 1999
Dont grind that spot ! Doing so will not be worth the risk of a vacuum leak. On some of the prototypes we had a problem welding the area between the runners that were close to each other and even added some welding inside. I doubt that you see see much of dif of any even on a dyno, so play it safe and let it be. As for that fitting, take it out and maybe put a 90 deg in there instead. Or prehpas change the fiiting on your fuel rail to a 90? BTW: is that for your fuel gauge?
I still remember hearing about the welding issues between the runners. I'm primarily concerned with the "short" sides. I also don't plan to get into the seams at all. Mostly just want to knock down the sharp edges.
[This message has been edited by Raydar (edited 10-29-2006).]
IP: Logged
08:47 PM
srat110 Member
Posts: 860 From: Lubbock, Tx, USA Registered: Aug 2005
Dont grind that spot ! Doing so will not be worth the risk of a vacuum leak. On some of the prototypes we had a problem welding the area between the runners that were close to each other and even added some welding inside. I doubt that you see see much of dif of any even on a dyno, so play it safe and let it be. As for that fitting, take it out and maybe put a 90 deg in there instead. Or prehpas change the fiiting on your fuel rail to a 90? BTW: is that for your fuel gauge?
Yeah, I decided to skip the grinding. I can always do it when I swap in the 3.2 this spring but your probably right about not seeing any gains. As for the fitting, yes it's for my fuel pressure gauge. Even with a 90 it wouldn't work. I plugged one hole and moved it. You'll see the pictures below.
I have the same little bit of over hang on my short runner Trueleo intake. I showed it to my engine shop that ported my heads and did all the work on my 3.4,272 cam,1.6 roller rockers, FOCOA headers, etc. I have the DM ported TB and Troy matched the intake inlet to match. The lower intake was ported by DM and the gasket matches it perfectly. My shop recommended that I leave it alone since the gains would be slight and the risk of a vacum leak would increase. The car revs to 6000K like you wouldn't believe possible in a 60-V6. Leave it alone. John
IP: Logged
10:39 PM
srat110 Member
Posts: 860 From: Lubbock, Tx, USA Registered: Aug 2005
Here is what I did with the Vacuum ports. I plugged the left port, drilled two 21/64th holes and tapped them with a 1/8-27 NPT tap. Then used some black high temp RTV as a thread sealer when I put them in. Then I blew it out with my air hose, washed out real good with my water hose, blew it out again with the air, and then alot of WD40 and shaking, pouring out, repeat. Worked like a charm.
Gauge clears now.
And she's in. Luckily my neighbor came out and lent a hand to help hold the intake while I got the EGR tube on and set the injectors in their holes. That's' the hardest part. I also replaced all my vacuum lines with hoses while I was at it. On my test drive I was hitting my rev limiter alot. I wasn't used to the car pulling past 5k so I kept my limiter set at 5500 since there wasn't any power above that anyway. I'll have to remember to bump that up a bit. Should keep me satisfied until I can get the 3.2 and getrag ready to swap in this spring.
[This message has been edited by srat110 (edited 10-30-2006).]
IP: Logged
11:18 PM
Oct 30th, 2006
lou_dias Member
Posts: 5350 From: Warwick, RI Registered: Jun 2000
srat110, Looks wicked mean.... I like it..... did Darrell do the porting recently? Have seen some post lately --if he still does the porting on t.b. & lower intakes.
IP: Logged
11:58 AM
srat110 Member
Posts: 860 From: Lubbock, Tx, USA Registered: Aug 2005
srat110, Looks wicked mean.... I like it..... did Darrell do the porting recently? Have seen some post lately --if he still does the porting on t.b. & lower intakes.
Haven't heard anything about DM in a while. The TB came with a 3.2 stroker I bought last weekend from Jeff88. Darrell does nice work. I'd keep trying to get in touch with him If I were you.
Wow, haven`t seen one side by side before--curious question do they have to take out the stop idle screw cap to take it apart for boring it---and did you have any problems re-setting it?
IP: Logged
12:51 PM
srat110 Member
Posts: 860 From: Lubbock, Tx, USA Registered: Aug 2005
Wow, haven`t seen one side by side before--curious question do they have to take out the stop idle screw cap to take it apart for boring it---and did you have any problems re-setting it?
I'm sure Darrel does. Mine has RTV in the hole for the screw so I would assume he knows how to set it.
IP: Logged
12:56 PM
Raydar Member
Posts: 40963 From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country. Registered: Oct 1999
Haven't heard anything about DM in a while. The TB came with a 3.2 stroker I bought last weekend from Jeff88. Darrell does nice work. I'd keep trying to get in touch with him If I were you.
Here's the difference.
I just got my lower intake back from Darrell a few weeks ago. He does great work! He does seem to be very busy.
IP: Logged
01:37 PM
Erik Member
Posts: 5625 From: Des Moines, Iowa Registered: Jul 2002
Ok , Darrell still does the lower intakes as well, would this be a direct bolt up then with the t.b bored out & the lower intake bored out --then add the whole trueleo package--anything else need to be done? Anyone have problems with idle--since the stop idle screw cap is removed during his process---I have good reason for asking--went threw a year or better with one that did--and don`t want to go threw it again--also working on the hunt idle problem , on another post, another Fiero, another problem. Oohhh this would be for that stroked 3.2 --has pretty much the ARI internals, I`m just not happy with the 8.5.1 compression.
Edit: to add the problem with the stop idle screw caps missing where not due to Darrell, the T.B.was like that when bought .
[This message has been edited by 3800superfast (edited 10-31-2006).]
Ok , Darrell still does the lower intakes as well, would this be a direct bolt up then with the t.b bored out & the lower intake bored out --then add the whole trueleo package--anything else need to be done? Anyone have problems with idle--since the stop idle screw cap is removed during his process---I have good reason for asking--went threw a year or better with one that did--and don`t want to go threw it again--also working on the hunt idle problem , on another post, another Fiero, another problem. Oohhh this would be for that stroked 3.2 --has pretty much the ARI internals, I`m just not happy with the 8.5.1 compression.
Edit: to add the problem with the stop idle screw caps missing where not due to Darrell, the T.B.was like that when bought .
an EFI engine TB with the idle screw... the screw is actually meant to stop the blade from closing too far and get stuck in the bore. it will not affect the idle unless it is open too far. the IAC valve should control your idle.
IP: Logged
09:04 AM
PFF
System Bot
srat110 Member
Posts: 860 From: Lubbock, Tx, USA Registered: Aug 2005
Ha, if it wasn't a reg trademark, it would be a good name for our intakes...
Just change the spelling to COOTEY. Many folks wouldn't know the difference.
Either way, it's a limited market. You could always do it until someone made you stop. People have been doing the same thing with "Fiero" logo stuff for years.
Originally posted by Kohburn: an EFI engine TB with the idle screw... the screw is actually meant to stop the blade from closing too far and get stuck in the bore. it will not affect the idle unless it is open too far. the IAC valve should control your idle.
Thanks, I know what your saying--- and how it works. I guess I should have worded it differently. (my bad) I was trying to get a feel for idle problems ( if any? ) that may have occured after getting back their bored out t.b.`s ----along with what can I expect with bolting on the whole trueleo package to a stroked 3.2 .
IP: Logged
01:03 PM
Francis T Member
Posts: 6620 From: spotsylvania va. usa Registered: Oct 2003
Ok , Darrell still does the lower intakes as well, would this be a direct bolt up then with the t.b bored out & the lower intake bored out --then add the whole trueleo package--anything else need to be done? Anyone have problems with idle--since the stop idle screw cap is removed during his process---I have good reason for asking--went threw a year or better with one that did--and don`t want to go threw it again--also working on the hunt idle problem , on another post, another Fiero, another problem. Oohhh this would be for that stroked 3.2 --has pretty much the ARI internals, I`m just not happy with the 8.5.1 compression.
Edit: to add the problem with the stop idle screw caps missing where not due to Darrell, the T.B.was like that when bought .
Just tell us you are going to use bored out TB and we'll make the TB flange on our intake big enough.