Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T - Archive
  Whats true in this viral email? ..UN gun resolution

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Whats true in this viral email? ..UN gun resolution by 2.5
Started on: 01-27-2014 10:06 AM
Replies: 14
Last post by: Boondawg on 01-27-2014 03:07 PM
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 10:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Direct Link to This Post
How much of this is truth?


- The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution.Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11: “CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION, DISARMAMENT ---”
At least our Texas Senators are not on this list. I am sorry to see so many other states have a sorry record of the 2nd amendment support.
Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known !! See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 “legis..traitors”… vote against them.
In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented aninternational gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.
Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)j
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
Folks: This needs to go viral. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N."[/i]

[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 01-27-2014).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Rallaster
Member
Posts: 9105
From: Indy southside, IN
Registered: Jul 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 84
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 10:35 AM Click Here to See the Profile for RallasterSend a Private Message to RallasterDirect Link to This Post
Here's the full text of section 11 of U. N. Resolution 2117:

 
quote
11. Calls for Member States to support weapons collection, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex-combatants, as well as physical security and stockpile management programmes by United Nations peacekeeping operations where so mandated;


The full text of the resolution can be read here:
https://www.un.org/News/Pre...2013/sc11131.doc.htm
IP: Logged
TK
Member
Posts: 10013
From:
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 200
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 10:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for TKSend a Private Message to TKDirect Link to This Post
This is also true:

"Reaffirming the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system,"
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 19113
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 206
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 11:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadDirect Link to This Post
And when was this vote in the Senate taken?

Reid would not let it come to the floor if it would fail.

With that said, I have little doubt the members listed would indeed vote as shown.

Michigan's Senators are both party-line weasels.
IP: Logged
Marvin McInnis
Member
Posts: 11599
From: ~ Kansas City, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 11:32 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Marvin McInnisClick Here to visit Marvin McInnis's HomePageSend a Private Message to Marvin McInnisDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
lurker
Member
Posts: 12353
From: salisbury nc usa
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 236
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 11:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for lurkerSend a Private Message to lurkerDirect Link to This Post
the nonsense we post on the internet is forever, and will probably be cited someday to substantiate someone's lame position.

so i just want to put this out there now.

i am in charge of everything, and y'all just better get to worshipping me before it's to late. the proper way to worship me is to send your young good lookin wimmin for me to "annoint". don't hold any back, you wouldn't want to risk my wrath.
IP: Logged
NEPTUNE
Member
Posts: 10199
From: Ticlaw FL, and some other places.
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 288
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 11:56 AM Click Here to See the Profile for NEPTUNESend a Private Message to NEPTUNEDirect Link to This Post
Am I the only one (here) who finds it more than a little bit scary that the American Gun Cultists are so easily duped?
Guns - brains can't be good.

Thanks, Marvin.
And Lurker.
------------------

I speak English. Sue me.

[This message has been edited by NEPTUNE (edited 01-27-2014).]

IP: Logged
lurker
Member
Posts: 12353
From: salisbury nc usa
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 236
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 12:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lurkerSend a Private Message to lurkerDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by NEPTUNE:

Am I the only one (here) who finds it more than a little bit scary that the American Gun Cultists are so easily duped?
Guns - brains can't be good.

Thanks, Marvin.
And Lurker.


everyone is being duped, pro-gun, anti-gun, all of us. politicians , corporations, pacs, they have their agendas and try to shape public opinion to their own ends, usually short term or personal gain. they consider us pawns, lie to us, poison us, discard us when it suits them. we are "human resources".
IP: Logged
Marvin McInnis
Member
Posts: 11599
From: ~ Kansas City, USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 12:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Marvin McInnisClick Here to visit Marvin McInnis's HomePageSend a Private Message to Marvin McInnisDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lurker:

politicians , corporations, pacs, they have their agendas and try to shape public opinion to their own ends, usually short term or personal gain.



Sadly, I tend to agree. Most people cannot think, much less plan, beyond their immediate needs and their own lifetime. In fact, I would speculate that most people seldom plan beyond the next day or two, if that. Some people seldom think at all.
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 12:36 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lurker:


everyone is being duped, pro-gun, anti-gun, all of us. politicians , corporations, pacs, they have their agendas and try to shape public opinion to their own ends, usually short term or personal gain. they consider us pawns, lie to us, poison us, discard us when it suits them. we are "human resources".


Yep.
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43235
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 12:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Direct Link to This Post

2.5

43235 posts
Member since May 2007
 
quote
Originally posted by Marvin McInnis:

http://www.factcheck.org/20...onal-gun-ban-treaty/


"Update, Oct. 16, 2013: Secretary of State John Kerry signed the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty on behalf of President Obama and the United States on Sept. 25. In a statement, he said the treaty is “about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue actors,” and “reducing the risk of international transfers of conventional arms that will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes.” He added that the treaty “recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes.”

The treaty had previously been approved by a U.N. General Assembly vote in April. That was after all 193 U.N. member nations failed to agree on the treaty text in conference. Of the nations participating in the General Assembly vote, 154 voted in favor (the U.S. included), three voted against (the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Iran and Syria), and 23 abstained.


Back in March, the Senate voted 53 to 46 in favor of Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe’s amendment to prevent the U.S. from entering into the treaty. But that vote was purely symbolic and not binding. Now that Kerry has signed the treaty, the Senate must vote again to approve a resolution of ratification before the U.S. can be bound by the treaty’s terms."

-

In considering what I should reply to the person who sent me this viral email..
Is it fair to say this part may be true then?

"The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, ... would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S."

[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 01-27-2014).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
lurker
Member
Posts: 12353
From: salisbury nc usa
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 236
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 02:06 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lurkerSend a Private Message to lurkerDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 2.5:
In considering what I should reply to the person who sent me this viral email..
Is it fair to say this part may be true then?

"The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, ... would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S."


oh, nooo! i might have to buy american-made guns! ok, that would kind of suck. no more phillipine-made 1911s.
IP: Logged
heybjorn
Member
Posts: 10079
From: pace fl
Registered: Apr 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 97
Rate this member

Report this Post01-27-2014 02:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for heybjornSend a Private Message to heybjornDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lurker:

everyone is being duped, . . . they consider us pawns, . . .


We are all being duped
Just here to be ruled
Socialist subjects
Capitalist tools
Impulse consumers
Sport loving fools
We are all being duped
Just here to be ruled

Two more verses and I have a song for the album No Seatbelts In A Blender

IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post01-27-2014 02:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lurker:
so i just want to put this out there now.

i am in charge of everything, and y'all just better get to worshipping me before it's to late. the proper way to worship me is to send your young good lookin wimmin for me to "annoint". don't hold any back, you wouldn't want to risk my wrath.


Dear Your Exalted Man-God,

It is with great regret with-which I am forced to put quill to paper.
I have no young good-looking women to send you.
Please accept this picture I drew for you, suitable for rubbing-one-out:



Sorry for the lack of definition, but I finished before I finished.
Here's hoping you do the same.

Your Humble Servant,
Boondawg
IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 38235
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
User Banned

Report this Post01-27-2014 03:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgDirect Link to This Post

Boondawg

38235 posts
Member since Jun 2003
 
quote
Originally posted by heybjorn:


We are all being duped
Just here to be ruled
Socialist subjects
Capitalist tools
Impulse consumers
Sport loving fools
We are all being duped
Just here to be ruled

Two more verses and I have a song for the album No Seatbelts In A Blender


When we're young we're told it's ours,
But less like players, more like cards.

They sell us cars & diet-dreams,
And model women magazines.

Accounts get larger, to them we pay,
While one blue pill erase the day.
And all the more we seem to get,
You think to win, don't place that bet.

The dream is dead within the fray,
A future sold for yesterday.
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock