 
     |
| Any and all things 3.4 DOHC........... (Page 5/125) |
|
pavo_roddy
|
NOV 26, 07:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Emc209i
|
NOV 26, 07:42 PM
|
|
Then we shall build on I guess!  [This message has been edited by Emc209i (edited 11-27-2006).]
|
|
|
|
pavo_roddy
|
NOV 26, 07:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Emc209i
|
NOV 26, 08:21 PM
|
|
|
. [This message has been edited by Emc209i (edited 12-05-2008).]
|
|
|
|
pavo_roddy
|
NOV 26, 09:43 PM
|
|
Hi all,
Sorry mate, but I've come across nada so far on that subject......Have you tried searching dohcfiero.com yet?
edit: Forgot to add that, I think most just send thier harnesses to Erik, name on the forum, and he mates them together.... His price sounds pretty reasonable, around $ 250 I believe..... I can understand about wanting to do the work your self though..
------------------
Me, I sell engines, the cars are for free, I need something to crate the engines in....
Enzo Ferrari....[This message has been edited by pavo_roddy (edited 11-26-2006).]
|
|
|
|
Emc209i
|
NOV 27, 12:39 AM
|
|
|
. [This message has been edited by Emc209i (edited 12-05-2008).]
|
|
|
|
4-mulaGT
|
NOV 27, 03:23 PM
|
|
Ok say I wanted the good cams out of the 91-95 the SFI/OBD 1.5 of 94-95 and the better head and intake design of the 96-97
What should I do?
Should I get a complete 94-95 engine and just swap heads & intake?
Or should I get a complete 96-97 engine and swap cams and computer?[This message has been edited by 4-mulaGT (edited 11-27-2006).]
|
|
|
Emc209i
|
NOV 27, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
. [This message has been edited by Emc209i (edited 12-05-2008).]
|
|
|
|
FieroWannaBe
|
NOV 27, 05:46 PM
|
|
|
thats why people say to use 96-97 heads, since the head flows better on the exhaust side, including the manifold. ------------------
PROJECT 1986 GT Stormbringer
|
|
|
|
4-mulaGT
|
NOV 27, 06:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Emc209i:
If it were me, I'd take a 95 motor and put the the cams in 96 heads. There is reason why I wouldn't do this though. Although many people brag about the 96 flow numbers I don't see as to where they are so benificial that I would have to use the newer heads. By adding a short runner intake you can increase flow numbers drastically, as well as headers. The bigger restrictions in fact are not the heads but the intake and exhaust carriers (Plenium and Exhaust headers).
Have a short runner intake and a nice exhaust system built rather than worrying about 96 heads, you'll make more power with the same amount of money invested. Its all a matter of financial possition for me, so I'm thinking about what would be more economic power.
Just my $.02 Hope it helps |
|
Thank You
I like that they flow better but one of the main things I like about the 96+ heads is the much higher quench area for a future turbo 
so everything bolts onto the new heads? do I have to worry about oil ports or anything like that?
|
|
|
|
