To use or not use zero lash end links on the back? (Page 1/2)
Kitskaboodle FEB 06, 11:02 PM
This question should resonate with those who auto-cross their Fiero’s. I did a search and found a discussion or two about whether one should use Rodney’s zero lash end links on the back of one’s Fiero. (the discussions assumed the front of the car already had Rodney’s links installed)

From what I read in the discussions, it appears the consensus was that the car handles better with the zero lash end links on the front only.

Do you have them on your Fiero? What is your experience with them? Has anyone tried them front and back? If so, how did your Fiero handle?

As an fyi, I recently installed two sets. Both sets were installed on the fronts of my 85 & 86 GT. (both cars have factory front swap bars and FieroStore rear bars)
Thanks, Kit

[This message has been edited by Kitskaboodle (edited 02-06-2023).]

Patrick FEB 06, 11:55 PM

quote
Originally posted by Kitskaboodle:

I did a search and found a discussion or two about whether one should use Rodney’s zero lash end links on the back of one’s Fiero. (the discussions assumed the front of the car already had Rodney’s links installed) From what I read in the discussions, it appears the consensus was that the car handles better with the zero lash end links on the front only.



I may've been one of those people involved in the discussions you found. The usual (but not 100%) consensus is that you want the front sway bar stiffer than the rear sway bar on a Fiero. On my '84 (which I both daily-drove and autocrossed years ago), I installed a factory front sway bar in the rear. To make the sway bar on the front act "stiffer" than the rear mounted one, I installed zero lash end links on the front only (and used regular rubber-cushioned end links in the rear). I was very happy with how my '84 handled on the track. Very neutral handling. If pushed, the car would four-wheel drift in the sweeps. Felt great. The only problem was that the duke was gutless.

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 02-07-2023).]

Kitskaboodle FEB 07, 01:04 AM
Thanks for the input Patrick.
I am curious if anyone tried them on both ends and what “bad” (or undesirable traits) the car exhibited.
Kit
cvxjet FEB 07, 02:10 AM
I only have the Zero-lash links on the REAR stabilizer bar....I have done some odd things to how my bars are mounted front and rear- improving turn-in while cutting back on the Drop-Throttle-oversteer. (Usually, you improve one while making the other worse)

I have been into handling since my first car (1972 Comet GT)...My 73 mach 1 was where I really started to make progress on suspension tuning; A friend told me that "Your shocks suck" so I started doing research on shocks- installed KYB Gas-a-just (Custom size up front) plus odd stabilizer mounting and 1986 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 steering box internals into Ford Box (High effort, quick ratio)...That same friend, who autocrossed a BMW 3 series (And had years earlier raced a Trans Am Mustang) came back from the second test drive shaking his head;

"What's wrong?!"

"Your Mustang out-handles...and Out-rides my BMW!"

Here is a link to my Thread on how I set up my stabilizer bars on my Fiero; https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/140674.html
Patrick FEB 07, 03:49 AM

quote
Originally posted by Kitskaboodle:

I am curious if anyone tried them on both ends and what “bad” (or undesirable traits) the car exhibited.



Keep in mind the point I was trying to make is that it isn't the zero lash end links themselves that make all the difference... it's the stiffness of the entire rear sway bar assembly relative to the entire front sway bar assembly.

You have aftermarket rear sway bars installed. I don't know how their rigidity compares to the front factory sway bars.

I believe the way it works is... Extra sway bar stiffness up front will cause the vehicle to "plow" (understeer) into a corner, whereas extra sway bar stiffness in the rear will encourage the rear end to snap around (oversteer) in a corner.
fieroguru FEB 07, 06:58 AM
I use them front/rear on my 88 with the upgraded addco sway bars. I find my car to be very neutral in the corners where mid corner I can switch back and forth between oversteer and understeer with throttle input.

I think it all comes down to how well all of your suspension pieces work together. If your car/setup handles better with the rubber or poly end links, that is OK. Give the car what it wants.
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 07, 03:55 PM
Can someone explain to me what is meant by "zero lash" and where these fancy Rodney Dickman end-links are? I still have the stock ones on my Fiero, and would like to upgrade.


Thanks!
Rick Vanderpool FEB 07, 04:31 PM
Zero lash end links replace the standard links. They eliminate any slop in the anti-sway bar to suspension arms.
http://rodneydickman.com/ad...=Zero+Lash+End+Links
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 07, 06:14 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rick Vanderpool:

Zero lash end links replace the standard links. They eliminate any slop in the anti-sway bar to suspension arms.
http://rodneydickman.com/ad...=Zero+Lash+End+Links




Awesome! Thank you!
hyperv6 FEB 15, 09:02 PM
Just for what it worth.

I have the Herb Adams VSE suspension on my Fiero. This set up was done for racing in showroom stock racing.

Herb was the suspension guy for Pontiac and was the father of the Trans Am.

He was a racer and was well known for taking his wife’s 1964 Lemans and turning it into a Trans Am racer. He nearly beat Penske and Mark Donahue in a race with Bob Tullius driving in 1969.

The set up uses a 1” front bar and solid links with a 1 1/4 “ rear bar and rubber Bushings.

There also is solid control arm bushings to remove the bump steer.

That is what one of the best GM and race engineers used on the Fiero. This was a properly tested and engineered system that works all together not just sone part added and seat of the pants tested.

[This message has been edited by hyperv6 (edited 02-15-2023).]