|
OK, here's a question: Left or Right? (Page 2/5) |
|
olejoedad
|
DEC 20, 07:40 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
I see a phrase that looks somewhat common... "anti-freedom fascist". But I don't see "freedom fascist" being used as an epithet or category descriptor.
Google search.
Edited to add: Looks like an instance of "freedom fascist" being used as an epithet or category descriptor on TikTok.
|
|
Have you an opinion on the question posed by the O/P?
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
DEC 20, 10:11 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
What's it gonna be, boy?
The American civil war
Who were the Leftists and who were the Right Wing? Please explain your answer. It would also help us understand your position if you can tell us where on the left/right spectrum you see yourself.
I know what I believe, and I will explain after I get a few answers from the modern American Left and Right.
|
|
Without reading the other comments, I will say that there were both good and bad people on both sides. As they say Trump apparently said.
The North, which was mostly Republican, were not necessarily angels themselves. If we're basing it entirely on slavery, the north created the concept of indentured servitude, which they did against the Chinese and Irish that fled to the United States, particularly after the potato famine. They were basically slaves in the exact same way that Qatar and Abu Dhabi enslave people from Bangladesh, etc... though perhaps they're treated a bit better than the Irish and Chinese were since they forced their children to work as well, and parents were often killed, and they were also mistreated as well in stores that were meant for only Americans.
Anyway, the South had a few reasons for the civil war, one of which was they were against high Federal taxation and what they felt was exploitation against them by the other states... in effect, they didn't like that they were being forced to pay with their taxes, Federal bills that provided funding to projects in the north. The slavery issue, while the north had mostly abolished slavery (mostly in principle), they didn't really make it a thing until it was specifically advantageous to them... e.g., when Lincoln passed the Emancipation Proclamation. I want to believe, as a proud Republican, that Lincoln was 100% anti-slavery and he wanted this all along... and I do absolutely believe he was anti-slavery, in part because of his close colleague, friend, and advisor... Frederick Douglass... but to some extent, I also recognize that this was very much the same as King Philip did with the prisoners during the Crusades... you're pardoned if you fight for the cause. The Emancipation Proclamation, among other things, was to let slaves in the South know they had freedom in the north, which was advantageous to the fight.
My family throughout their entire history has been Republican. Yeah, I voted Democrat when I was an adult teen, but Bill Clinton is pretty much like Trump is today. I know that ideologies can change, and things can shift... but I disagree strongly that Republicans were the "racists" or the nonsense narrative we always here... "the parties switched."
Here are the facts that I know...
- Prescott Bush voted FOR the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Al Gore's father, voted against it. - Senator Byrd of West Virginia, was a Democrat, and former KKK grand master, and continued to be a Democrat Senator until just 8 years ago. - Margaret Sanger was a Democrat, created the concept of Eugenics, which meant sterilizing surgery on black men and women, and forcing abortions on black women. - Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, and they intentionally put Planned Parenthood facilities in majority black neighborhoods. - This process continues, and the overwhelming vast majority of babies that are aborted are black. - Japanese Internment Camps - Trail of Tears - Jim Crow (was a Democrat last I remember) - Jim Jones (also a Democrat since we're going through the Jims) - Only two nuclear bombs ever used in wartime in the world... both authorized by a Democrat... 380k Japanese killed in an instant.
... I could go on, but I guess I need to focus on civil war.
There's no more "perfect" example of the idealistic liberal, than Franklin D. Roosevelt. He served 4 presidential terms... literally the only president to serve more than two terms. When Democrats always talk about dictatorships, etc... he's the only one that sought to serve longer than the unspoken rule of 2 terms. They literally had to pass a law after that to eliminate anyone else doing this in the future.
Anyway, the reason I bring up FDR is because the Democrats always say that in the 60s, the Republicans switched parties, and really, the Republicans back then were the Democrats, and the Democrats were the Republicans. This makes no sense to me... because are we saying then that from the 30s through the mid-1940s... FDR was really a Republican? Because FDR is the ideological Democrat... literally the basis that everyone uses for what the Democrat party should be today. Then are we saying that Eisenhower was a Democrat? When he aligned completely with the Republican party... and even forced desegregation, against the Democrats whom all wanted it?
It's just not possible in any context that the Democrats and Republicans made such a quick transition... changing from Republican to Democrat every few years.. so that it neatly aligned that the Democrats can say all the bad things they did were actually done by Republicans. Because here's the facts... literally every travesty thus far in American history, was conducted basically under a Democrat president... this is a fact.
Another strong piece of information that's more recent... when I moved to Florida in 1996, it was a HEAVY blue state. It was SOLIDLY Democrat... I mean... I can't tell you. Before 1999, we'd only had one or two Republican Governors in the past 140+ year history of Florida prior to 1999, and I think in both cases, it was because the Democrat governor had a scandal that resulted in them leaving office and a Republican winning. In any event, Florida was a solidly blue state. Nearly all our congressmen and women were Democrat, and senators ... ? **** .. they've all been Democrat since the Civil War prior to 2000 with the exception of one which was appointed by the then-Republican governor who won because of a Democrat governor scandal.
SINCE 1996... I've seen a slow and progressive shift towards Florida becoming Republican. When I got here, the state was as **** -hole. There was a ton of crime (see Miami Vice), lots of gangs, organized crime, and the KKK had their Southern Headquarters here in Davie, Florida. SINCE 1996... all of that is now gone. Florida is one of the most prosperous states in the entire union potentially soon to become THE most prosperous state in the union after CA and NY's budget failures this year, and Florida's unemployment rate which if I'm not mistaken, is the lowest in the country right now... 2.6%?
Florida is the most ethnically and culturally diverse state in all of the United States. I know California likes to say they are, but saying that you are 50% Hispanic (of Mexican heritage) and 30% Asian (of Chinese heritage) does not make you ethnically diverse. Florida has significant representation from all over the world, with a Hispanic population that is made up of Cubans, Venezuelans, Argentines, Brazilians, Panamanians, etc. Not to mention it's a haven for Europeans of every country, both Eastern and Western Europe, as well as a diverse Thai and Vietnamese cultures. Florida is everything that Democrat governors strive to be, but loath Florida for becoming it. We were also one of the first states to legalize gay marriage, while states like California were passing laws such as Proposition 8 which banned gay marriage.
So... unironically, I've come to learn that basically anything Democrats say is just complete bull **** . It gets worse and worse every year... and I've also come to learn that if Democrats are claiming Republicans are doing something wrong, it LITERALLY means the Democrats have actually just done the very thing they're claiming Republicans are doing.
Sorry if this didn't answer your question... but this **** gets me going.[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 12-20-2022).]
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
DEC 21, 11:39 AM
|
|
Since we are comparing mid-19th century to modern times, here is another way of looking at it...
Do we have the right to leave a bad relationship ? Marriage ? Job ? Association ? Club ?
Do we have the right to form or join a new one ?
Or are we forced to remain in one that doesnt work for us ?
(Yeh, we DO have the right to say "eff you, I'm outta here")
That's basically what the Confederacy was doing. Quitting a job. Filing for divorce. Leaving the association.
We use legal papers now instead of just shooting and blowing sheet up like they did in the 19th century (unfortunately) but same idea.
Score one more for the good guys and defenders of individual rights and freedoms.
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 21, 11:43 AM
|
|
The south had the right to secede, as does California or Puerto Rico. They did not have the right to attack the USA.
edit: ...or Texas. Texas has the right to secede and to defend itself against foreign invasion.[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 12-21-2022).]
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 21, 12:14 PM
|
|
I didn’t start this thread to renegotiate the Civil War.
I started this thread to encourage people to reexamine their concept of the Left/Right political paradigm from a unique perspective.
Oh, I say we won the civil war, because I am an American. But I am also a Southerner by birth and heritage. I am from the New South. My grandfather, after whom I was named, was from Alabama and named his print shop "The New South Press". Some will understand.[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 12-21-2022).]
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
DEC 21, 01:04 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
I didn’t start this thread to renegotiate the Civil War.
I started this thread to encourage people to reexamine their concept of the Left/Right political paradigm from a unique perspective.
Oh, I say we won the civil war, because I am an American. But I am also a Southerner by birth and heritage. I am from the New South. My grandfather, after whom I was named, was from Alabama and named his print shop "The New South Press". Some will understand.
|
|
I get it.
But as for modern the Left/Right political paradigm, too much has merged, swapped sides, crossed lines and crossed back.
It's all as clear as mud when broken down into 2 simple sides.
I was gonna blame you for it, but these days it seems more fashionable to blame Canada.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
DEC 21, 03:46 PM
|
|
The South did not have the right to secede from the rest of the states.
Currently, no state has the right to secede.
See Texas v White
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
DEC 21, 04:01 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
The South did not have the right to secede from the rest of the states.
Currently, no state has the right to secede.
See Texas v White |
|
YES, we do have the right to succed. All humans do.
Thats why wars start...
Ya were told to eff off. (politically-speaking)
I dont have the right to leave ?.....me and my gun will just see about that.
I have the right to leave (succeed) whenever I damn-well please....Being held hostage just pisses me off, and is probablt going to result in me peein in your rice krispies. (if yu had rice krispies. And if this wasnt the internet )
Ya can step aside on yer own, or I can go through you. (not you personally, it politics)...but when I say "leaving", we can do this the nice way or the hard way.[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 12-21-2022).]
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 21, 04:35 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
The South did not have the right to secede from the rest of the states.
Currently, no state has the right to secede.
See Texas v White |
|
Secession may not be legal, but I believe it is a right. The US was born of just such an act. This is a personal opinion. I don't expect anyone to agree.
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
DEC 21, 05:00 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
Secession may not be legal, but I believe it is a right. The US was born of just such an act. This is a personal opinion. I don't expect anyone to agree. |
|
You will find a lot, sir.
|
|
|
|