Merrick Garland assigns Special Council for Hunter Biden (Page 2/3)
fredtoast AUG 12, 12:18 PM
Hunter Biden is sleezy, but Republicans have been investigating him for 3 years and have nothing linking Joe Biden to any corruption. Hunter's laptop was in the hands of a Trump supporting computer expert for a year and they found nothing. Hunter's business associates Devon Archer and Tony Bobulinski can not provide any proof of corruption by Joe Biden.

I guess Republicans are just praying that Hunter Biden runs for President instead of Joe, because they go nothing on him.
olejoedad AUG 12, 12:25 PM

quote
Originally posted by fredtoast:

Hunter Biden is sleezy, but Republicans have been investigating him for 3 years and have nothing linking Joe Biden to any corruption. Hunter's laptop was in the hands of a Trump supporting computer expert for a year and they found nothing. Hunter's business associates Devon Archer and Tony Bobulinski can not provide any proof of corruption by Joe Biden.

I guess Republicans are just praying that Hunter Biden runs for President instead of Joe, because they go nothing on him.



I thought you only posted factual information.
fredtoast AUG 12, 12:32 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

I mean, did we expect a crackhead would be making these business deals?




Hunter has an undergraduate degree from Georgetown and Law Degree from Yale. He was successful at private sector jobs and was appointed to the Borad of Directors of Amtrack by REPUBLICAN President George W. Bush. He has exactly the type of resume of a person who would set up a venture capital business.

He is not like Donald Trump Jr. who never once in his life got a job that was not working for his daddy.
fredtoast AUG 12, 12:34 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


I thought you only posted factual information.




I did, but I guess I should have been more specific and said "legitimate" evidence.

If you disagree tell me why specifically.

[This message has been edited by fredtoast (edited 08-12-2023).]

olejoedad AUG 12, 12:36 PM

quote
Originally posted by fredtoast:
I did.

If you disagree just prove what I said was wrong.



You forgot the links. You always post links to prove your correctness. You've said that many times.
olejoedad AUG 12, 12:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by fredtoast:
Hunter has an undergraduate degree from Georgetown and Law Degree from Yale. He was successful at private sector jobs and was appointed to the Borad of Directors of Amtrack by REPUBLICAN President George W. Bush. He has exactly the type of resume of a person who would set up a venture capital business.

He is not like Donald Trump Jr. who never once in his life got a job that was not working for his daddy.



So Hunter is like Donald Trump, always 'working' for the 'family' business?
fredtoast AUG 12, 12:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


You forgot the links. You always post links to prove your correctness. You've said that many times.


I can't post a link to "nothing". It is like proving a negative.

It will be up to you to post something to prove me wrong.
fredtoast AUG 12, 12:40 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


So Hunter is like Donald Trump, always 'working' for the 'family' business?




No. Not at all. I don't believe he has ever worked for his father. He works with his uncle, but they are partners. His uncle did not hire him.
olejoedad AUG 12, 12:56 PM
You stated your opinion that there is no information linking the son's sleaziness to illegal actions by his father.

As the final 'facts' have not been released to the public, in ongoing investigations, perhaps you should follow the rules of decorum for lawyers concerning ongoing investigations and reserve comment.

You stated your opinion.

I guess it's up to you to prove my opinion wrong.
fredtoast AUG 12, 02:20 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

You stated your opinion that there is no information linking the son's sleaziness to illegal actions by his father.

As the final 'facts' have not been released to the public, in ongoing investigations, perhaps you should follow the rules of decorum for lawyers concerning ongoing investigations and reserve comment.

You stated your opinion.

I guess it's up to you to prove my opinion wrong.




I don't know what your opinion is. State it so that i can address it.

As far as the existence of "facts" that we don't know about I can only assume that if there were any then there would be some action taken on them. But to make you happy I will revise my statement to say that there is no evidence that we know about at this time.