|
Why the United States will not "split apart" (Page 2/3) |
|
fredtoast
|
SEP 10, 10:03 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by randye:
Looks like the usual combination of Leftist whack-job political theory and childlike wishful thinking.
|
|
Guess you missed the actual facts I posted about election results.
What part of what I posted was "whack job" and what part was "wishful thinking"?
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
SEP 10, 10:12 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by fredtoast:
I am sorry, but I don't understand this comment at all.
Please quote the section of my original posts that has anything to do with ballot harvesting. I don't see it at all. |
|
I'm not surprised.
|
|
|
fredtoast
|
SEP 10, 10:24 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
I'm not surprised. |
|
Thanks for admitting that your post was indecipherable gibberish.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
SEP 10, 10:43 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by fredtoast:
Thanks for admitting that your post was indecipherable gibberish. |
|
Now you're a mind reader?
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 10, 11:58 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad: The original post in this thread is a good argument for how ballot harvesting can sway an election. "Here, let me fill that out for you..."
|
|
Ballot harvesting? How does that connect with anything that the "toastman" has said?
It's an accusation, of crooks, or of partisans, or of crooked partisans (or partisan crooks) exploiting the ballot harvesting process in an improper and illegal way to tilt elections.
Can this accusation be backed up with evidence?
Maybe some of the lawyers who worked with or worked alongside the Trump 2020 presidential campaign could do more to investigate the idea that there's illegitimate ballot harvesting in the coming election. Of course, they might not be able to use their former credentials as lawyers, if they've been disbarred, but if they are not serving prison sentences, I don't see why they couldn't help collect the information that currently credentialed lawyers could use in any (hypothetical) investigations of ballot harvesting improprieties.
|
|
|
fredtoast
|
SEP 10, 12:42 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Now you're a mind reader? |
|
No. You admitted that you were not surprised that it was difficult to understand.
But instead of dancing around like this why don't you just explain what you meant. That way we could get back to discussing the the topic of the thread instead of your cryptic mewling.
|
|
|
ray b
|
SEP 10, 12:57 PM
|
|
still in the 1 to 100 numbers of voters who can't or willnot be allowed to vote under the Gop plan
so are you ok with stopping 100 voters from voting for every fraud prevented from voting
that is not counting at all even one NON voter who are about 1/2 of the people or more
100 told no you can't vote for rule x y or z OF THOSE who try to vote
for every real fraud
remember we allow the 26 smallest states to block progress with 18% of the people = 1/2 who really vote is 9% split 5 to 4 so real world 5% of the people control the government
I have seen no program from the Gop to have more people vote WONDER WHY THAT IS ?
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
SEP 10, 02:47 PM
|
|
We always enjoy your posts, rayb, even if we don't know what you're attempting to say....
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 10, 03:08 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by fredtoast: In the 2020 election the Democrat's candidate was both a mentally challenged invalid and a crime boss.
|
|
That seems like an extremist's description of Biden.
Maybe Biden, even as a "mentally challenged invalid" and a "crime boss," still looked better than the alternative in 2020—which would explain why the Biden-Harris ticket garnered so many popular votes.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 09-10-2023).]
|
|
|
ray b
|
SEP 10, 03:15 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
We always enjoy your posts, rayb, even if we don't know what you're attempting to say.... |
|
the small minded do have trouble with big ideas
100 people are stopped from voting by Gop rules
for every 1 single fraudulent vote
100 to 1
aka 1% fraud = 100 real citizens not allowed to vote
not an exceptable result except in rump land as the rumper figure many of the 100 are not rumpers
|
|
|