|
Secret Service Denies Protection To Trump for Wisconsin Rally (Page 2/5) |
|
cliffw
|
SEP 29, 10:44 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by ray b: the SS is in charge of protection of all heads of state at the UN or anywhere in the USA |
|
Thanks rayb. Why is the SS in charge of protection of all heads of State at the UN or anywhere in the USA ? There are 193 sovereign State members. Plus their delegates/staff. Do we get paid for their protection ? What do those SS personnel do after a UN General Assembly ? Ensuring the protection of all the heads of State at the UN would take quite an army.
Oh, wait. The UN has an army.
|
|
|
ray b
|
SEP 29, 01:48 PM
|
|
a un rep is NOT head of state and no the delegates do not rate SS protection
a real head of state when in the USA does rate SS protection when here
are you afraid of UN troops ? why ?
|
|
|
cliffw
|
SEP 30, 08:11 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by ray b: a un rep is NOT head of state and no the delegates do not rate SS protection |
|
Then why is the SS short on agents to protect your next President ?
quote | Originally posted by ray b: a real head of state when in the USA does rate SS protection when here |
|
Biden spoke at the UN General Assembly. As did Netanyahu.
Now I wonder about everyday Ambassadors
quote | Originally posted by ray b: are you afraid of UN troops ?
|
|
No one is ray ray. Where do they get their conscripts ? Do they even have a military base ?
|
|
|
ray b
|
OCT 01, 01:29 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by cliffw:
No one is ray ray. Where do they get their conscripts ? Do they even have a military base ?
|
|
THE ARE MEMBER NATIONS TROOPS
depends on the region and who volunteers when there is no standing UN army are you in fear of google again
''The UN has no standing army or police force of its own, and Member States are asked to contribute military and police personnel required for each operation. Peacekeepers wear their countries’ uniform and are identified as UN peacekeepers only by a UN blue helmet or beret and a badge. Civilian staff of peace operations are international civil servants, recruited and deployed by the UN Secretariat.
Information about UN Peacekeeping Missions, including the breakdown of the troop-contributing countries, is available through the UN Peacekeeping website.''
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
OCT 01, 01:56 PM
|
|
So, did the UN recruit the UNWRA staff that serves in the Middle East?
|
|
|
williegoat
|
OCT 01, 05:03 PM
|
|
The UN needs to find a new sugar daddy. I'm done with her crap.
|
|
|
randye
|
OCT 01, 11:18 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by IMSA GT:
So I have a question. It's known that every former president from a certain time period has secret service assigned to them for the rest of their lives. What happens when they want to go out and no one is available? Or better yet, if they have their own personal secret service assigned 24/7, couldn't they "borrow" them for the Trump rally?
|
|
One of the many reasons that the USSS has gone to crap in recent years might be attributed to it being moved from the U.S. Department of the Treasury to being under the Department of Homeland Shenanigans Security.
|
|
|
NewDustin
|
OCT 03, 01:05 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by Doug85GT:
UN General Assembly happens every year in September.
Presidential Election happens every four years.
Secret Service is shocked and unprepared when they both happened at the same time.
Has this ever happened before? I don't recall the Secret Service ever being unprepared to provide protection during an election.
|
|
For some perspective: Trump has held 37 rallies this cycle so far. Harris and Biden have held a combined 13 rallies so far. Just like election cycles prior, Trump places a disproportionate strain on the Secret Services for campaign security.
Complaining he isn't be treated fairly when they only provide security for 3x as many rallies for his campaign doesn't seem to make sense.[This message has been edited by NewDustin (edited 10-03-2024).]
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
OCT 03, 02:41 PM
|
|
Are you suggesting that the government should restrict campaign activities?
|
|
|
NewDustin
|
OCT 03, 03:35 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Are you suggesting that the government should restrict campaign activities? |
|
No. They're free to hold whatever rallies they like. I'm saying their access to government-funded services during the campaign is not unlimited, and they already use more government handout security than any other campaign.[This message has been edited by NewDustin (edited 10-03-2024).]
|
|
|