Whats your DNA worth ? (Page 3/3)
Jake_Dragon APR 17, 10:33 AM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

and an other no comment quote

say something dude
thought wonder bread got flicked ?

too bad he is back

what is the point
I thought the vax shots are one of the few things the rump did well
but somehow nut anti-vax is the nut-con brand no matter if it is the rump vax
that just becomes more alt-facts
sorry but your side is 100% SNOWFLAKE ON VAX ''JABS''
RESULTS MATTER fears and feelings DO NOT AND NEVER WILL

i HAD THE CV-19 before anyone knew anything about it
a very nasty bug I was in bed for 3 weeks lost 25 lbs down below 130
way worse then a flu
and again after the two shots
second cv-19 was a minor sickness nothing like before the shots

you are nuts if you do not get the vax
you can die
or kill others
anti-vax is stupid measles mumps chicken pox tetanus small pox or cv-19 no matter
vax can save lives
stupid people fight progress

don't be stupid



Jake_Dragon APR 17, 10:48 AM
There is no talking to some people. Nothing will change your mind, no matter what is said your mind is set.
After seeing the results of taking the VAX I do wish we would have passed on it. Trust the science when they will lie about results and tell you its impossible to make it any safer.
Look what they did to thousands of hemophiliacs, told them there was no way to make the procedure safer. Until someone did, you don't hear much about it now.

The Covid 19 vax research should have been made public for the good of all people on this rock. The only reason to keep it secret was to make money, and that they did...
82-T/A [At Work] APR 17, 11:32 AM

quote
Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:

There is no talking to some people. Nothing will change your mind, no matter what is said your mind is set.
After seeing the results of taking the VAX I do wish we would have passed on it. Trust the science when they will lie about results and tell you its impossible to make it any safer.
Look what they did to thousands of hemophiliacs, told them there was no way to make the procedure safer. Until someone did, you don't hear much about it now.

The Covid 19 vax research should have been made public for the good of all people on this rock. The only reason to keep it secret was to make money, and that they did...




100%

It's become an example of what we call CRONY CAPITALISM... which is unfortunate, because capitalism has brought more people out of poverty than any other concept in human history and it paints it in a negative light... but here we are, and oddly, the people supporting it are on the left. Bizzarro-world...

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 04-17-2023).]

rinselberg APR 18, 01:11 PM
"Anti-vaxxers loved to cite this study of COVID vaccine deaths. Now it's been retracted"
Michael Hiltzik for Yahoo!; April 11, 2023.
https://finance.yahoo.com/n...-cite-201139593.html

This report was first published in the Los Angeles Times. Here are some excerpts:


quote
[The study's author relied upon] people's perceptions about whether acquaintances died as a result of their COVID vaccinations to estimate the actual number of deaths.



quote
There were other red flags in Skidmore's paper. One was his reliance on the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, or VAERS, as a benchmark database for COVID vaccine injuries.

VAERS is not suitable for that purpose, as CDC makes crystal clear. That's because it's a repository of entirely voluntary reports that can be filed by anyone, including but not limited to doctors, patients and family members, who aren't required to document the injury.

"VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event," the CDC says. "A report to VAERS does not mean the vaccine caused the event."

What anecdotal claims about post-vaccine illnesses and death often overlook is the law of large numbers: With 672 million doses administered, "by random chance alone and the law of large numbers, there will be a large number of people who die within, say, 30 days of being vaccinated even if the vaccine has absolutely nothing to do with their deaths," Gorski observes. "That’s why VAERS numbers, divorced from baseline rates, are utterly meaningless."



quote
BMC Infectious Diseases [a medical research journal] was right to retract the paper, but it should have done so even more expeditiously. Why did it take so long?

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-18-2023).]