 
     |
| Ukraine says it damaged Russian flagship, crew evacuates (Page 5/5) |
|
OldsFiero
|
MAY 06, 02:59 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
This is Reply message #36 on this thread. Reply-35 (to improvise some referential notation) is from Patrick, and if it were not for my having read Reply-35, from Patrick, where Patrick quotes a sentence from Reply-34, I would not have any conscious awareness of anything that was said in Reply-34, which is from the "randye" account. I had been careful to scroll over or scroll beyond Reply-34 in such a way that I would not be aware of anything that was part of Reply-34, other than it's provenance from the "randye" account.
Reply-33 is from "williegoat", and in considering whether there is a logical and thoughtful response to Reply-33 from "williegoat" and Reply-35 from Patrick—but not Reply-34, from the "randye" account, which is not part of my observable universe, so to speak—I have this:
|
|
If this is your version of "Who's on first", you win
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 06, 03:51 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by OldsFiero:
If this is your version of "Who's on first", you win |
|
That may be the first time he has been told that.
|
|
|
|
Raydar
|
MAY 06, 06:10 PM
|
|
Shall we go for a two-fer?
"The Kremlin has denied that it has any information about a reported Ukrainian strike on a Russian warship in the Black Sea.
Speculation has been growing over the fate of the Admiral Makarov, which Ukrainian MP Oleksiy Goncharenko said on his Telegram account had been hit in a missile strike and burst into flames.
He said that the ship had been "badly damaged" after being hit by Ukrainian attacks but remained afloat for now. "Yes, yes, you understood everything correctly! The God of the seas takes revenge on the offenders of Ukraine," he wrote."
https://www.newsweek.com/ru...ack-sea-ship-1704189[This message has been edited by Raydar (edited 05-06-2022).]
|
|
|
|