Reasons Harris Lost (Page 6/9)
blackrams NOV 07, 08:26 AM
If, I was still a Registered Democrat, I would suggest Senator Mark Kelly would have made a much more competitive campaign in this election. I suspect he'll be a more prominent Dem in the future. That doesn't mean I'd vote for him but, I can see him becoming more popular among the Dems. He's obviously smart, knows and understands the military. supports most of the Dem's agenda and seems very well liked among the Dem general population. But he's got a problem, he's male and white, the last thing the Dem leadership want to promote. Yeah, it's a shame his gender and race will hold him back.

------------------
Rams
Learning most of life's lessons the hard way. .
You are only young once but, you can be immature indefinitely.

cliffw NOV 07, 08:59 AM

quote
Originally posted by Cliff Pennock:
A strong unified NATO is the best way to continue peace. However, with Trump back in the Oval Office, his past criticisms and skeptical stance on NATO could indicate a quiet but deliberate unraveling of the United States' role in the alliance. Throughout his previous term, Trump consistently criticized NATO allies for not meeting their financial obligations and suggested that the U.S. might not defend countries that don't "pay their fair share".



Cliff, it should be noted that the United States defended Europe in WW I and WW II, before the formation of NATO.
olejoedad NOV 07, 09:06 AM
I have no problem with America pressuring NATO members into fulfilling their contractual obligations.

How long can one live in a house if they don't pay the rent?
blackrams NOV 07, 09:13 AM

quote
Originally posted by Cliff Pennock:


Yes. A strong unified NATO is the best way to continue peace. However, with Trump back in the Oval Office, his past criticisms and skeptical stance on NATO could indicate a quiet but deliberate unraveling of the United States' role in the alliance. Throughout his previous term, Trump consistently criticized NATO allies for not meeting their financial obligations and suggested that the U.S. might not defend countries that don't "pay their fair share".



Cliff,
Seriously not trying to offensive here but, I do have a question. I do understand why Europeans would be concerned about President Elect Trump's win but, I have to ask. How should the US approach the issue of other NATO countries not paying the agreed share of the cost of NATO? The US has been paying the bills and defending other countries for far too long and to be frank, we're tired of carrying other countries share of the load.

Interested to learn your suggestions because I'm pretty sure, this subject will come up again during President Elect Trump's administration.


------------------
Rams
Learning most of life's lessons the hard way. .
You are only young once but, you can be immature indefinitely.

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-07-2024).]

maryjane NOV 07, 09:54 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Cliff, it should be noted that the United States defended Europe in WW I and WW II, before the formation of NATO.



....the United States defended saved Europe in WW I and WW II, before.............. (twice in the same 1/2 century)

maryjane NOV 07, 10:00 AM
how much is spent by each NATO member?
NewDustin NOV 07, 03:04 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

We've got enough to go around. Plus, these players get to help spread Canadian ideals to other countries far and wide. It's all part of a covert plan for Canadian world domination... damn, I've said too much!


75% of our 2023 Cup team is from Canada. That's the kind of world domination I can get behind
blackrams NOV 07, 07:55 PM

quote
Originally posted by NewDustin:

75% of our 2023 Cup team is from Canada. That's the kind of world domination I can get behind



Cup Team? Hmm.......... OK.

Rams
maryjane NOV 07, 08:35 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


Cup Team? Hmm.......... OK.

Rams


Athletic cup Ron..

blackrams NOV 07, 09:10 PM

quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Athletic cup Ron..



Gotcha!

Rams