 
     |
| Army reservist's traumatic brain injuries eyed in last year's deadly shooting spree. (Page 8/9) |
|
williegoat
|
MAR 13, 03:20 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
Don't make us have to go through all these posts again. Who stated this? Better yet, please supply a quote.
|
|
Here is one of the times you said it: https://www.fiero.nl/forum/...ML/000208-2.html#p60
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
The more you post in this thread Willie, the more I think maybe you shouldn't have any.
I think we're done here. |
|
Apparently, you were not done, though.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
MAR 13, 04:27 PM
|
|
This is a deeper dive into what some experts are saying about the physical brain abnormalities that were discovered during a postmortem examination of the Lewiston perpetrator. And this:
| quote | Sean Hodgson, Card’s close friend and a fellow reservist, said Thursday that safety was a top priority at their training range and the blast exercises were well controlled.
“In my opinion it’s one of the safest ranges to be on,” Hodgson said. “I never heard him complain about the blasts.”
Six weeks before the shooting, Hodgson texted an Army supervisor about his growing concerns about Card, saying, “I believe he’s going to snap and do a mass shooting.”
That Sept. 15 message came months after relatives warned police that Card had grown paranoid and said they were concerned about his access to guns.
Card was hospitalized in a psychiatric unit for two weeks in July after shoving a fellow reservist and locking himself in a motel room. In August, the Army barred him from handling weapons while on duty and declared him non-deployable. |
|
Holly Ramer and Michael Casey of the Associated Press, for PBS News Hour online; March 8, 2024.
https://www.pbs.org/newshou...explain-his-violence[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-13-2024).]
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
MAR 13, 04:30 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
All it takes would be an accusation and an activist "WOKE" judge based on what's being proposed.
|
|
Do you realize how absurd this argument sounds?
Can't have DUI laws or laws against public intoxication because Baptist judges won't follow the law.
Can't have laws against racial discrimination because minority judges won't follow the law.
Can't have laws against domestic violence because women judges will not follow the law.
YOU CAN NOT SIMULTANIOUSLY CLAIM TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION AND THEN REFUSE TO OBEY THE COURTS SYSTEM AND LAWS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
MAR 13, 04:36 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
Even ignoring the fact that these laws are a clear violation of both the second and forth amendments, |
|
No they do not violate the Constitution. Red Flag laws have been upheld by the Supreme Court as long as the protect due process. Red flag laws have been in effect in some states for over 20 years.
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
MAR 13, 04:44 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
No they do not violate the Constitution. Red Flag laws have been upheld by the Supreme Court as long as the protect due process. Red flag laws have been in effect in some states for over 20 years.
|
|
The Supreme Court also upheld slavery at one time.
|
|
|
Patrick
|
MAR 13, 05:00 PM
|
|
Ah yes, a two year old thread where you made a groundless accusation...
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat Here:
When you hate America and advocate for her disarmament, you are my adversary.
|
|
You're not exactly building a stronger case here regarding your mental stability and/or right to posses firearms.
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
Apparently, you were not done, though.
|
|
I was "done" in that thread, and was quite prepared to move on, but you just couldn't leave it be. You make it sound like I was chasing after you. It's all still there to see and read. If you mention me in a post, I'll most likely respond... "done" or not. Your revisionist history doesn't wash.[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 03-13-2024).]
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
MAR 13, 05:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
MAR 13, 06:06 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
I was "done" in that thread, and was quite prepared to move on, but you just couldn't leave it be. You make it sound like I was chasing after you. It's all still there to see and read. If you mention me in a post, I'll most likely respond... "done" or not. Your revisionist history doesn't wash.
|
|
I highly encourage everyone to read that thread.
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
MAR 13, 06:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jdv:
Even in Canada witch has the thoroughest gun laws in North America guns still find a way to kill.
|
|
Canadians may be made of tough stuff, but even we're no match for a fired projectile.
|
|
|
Patrick
|
MAR 13, 06:10 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
I highly encourage everyone to read that thread.
|
|
As do I! When read with no preconceived notions, it's quite illuminating.
|
|
|
