Lawyer linked to Democrats, indicted by John Durham, acquitted by DC jury. (Page 1/2)
rinselberg MAY 31, 12:33 PM
"Michael Sussmann Is Acquitted in Case Brought by Trump-Era Prosecutor"

quote
The Democratic-linked lawyer was accused of lying about his clients to the F.B.I. when he passed on a tip about possible connections between Donald J. Trump and Russia.


Charlie Savage for the New York Times; May 31, 2022.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...mann-durham-fbi.html

District of Columbia jury says "John Durham is Bull (as in bull-pucky) Durham."

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 05-31-2022).]

blackrams MAY 31, 08:00 PM
Not really surprised a DC jury came to that conclusion.

Rams
Notorio JUN 01, 12:26 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Not really surprised a DC jury came to that conclusion.

Rams



AFAIK Durham did not make a motion for a change of venue, when every schoolboy would know a DC jury would never convict. Why would something so obvious be overlooked by such an experience prosecutor?? Was this a clever way to have a trial (to appease the Right) that could never be won (to appease the Left?) Well, there's a theory out there that Durham wanted the bias to play out in this trial so he can successfully argue for a change of venue in The Next Trials, the ones that really matter. If this is correct, then he also picked up a few bonuses along the way (in the form of new information and connections.) We shall see ...
williegoat JUN 01, 12:32 AM
The judge and jury were both tainted. No one expected a conviction. Sussman is small game.
On the other hand, the testimony provided some very valuable information. This was "exploratory surgery".
williegoat JUN 01, 12:38 AM
I know no one reads this thread, but take a look at my last two posts.
cliffw JUN 01, 07:48 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Politics & Religion
Topic: Lawyer linked to Democrats, indicted by John Durham, acquitted by DC jury.

District of Columbia jury says "John Durham is Bull (as in bull-pucky) Durham."



You must be so happy to have posted that in size three type.

When was your first clue that Sussmann would be protected ?

When you found out that three jurors donated to Hillary's campaign ? Was it when you heard that one donated to AOC's campaign ? Perhaps you got a clue when you found out that one juror's child was on a school sports team with the defense council's child ?

Maybe it was when Federal judge Christopher Cooper said he and Sussmann were "professional acquaintances" while at the Justice Department in the 1990s. And the judge's wife represents former FBI lawyer Lisa Page ?

Possibly when the Federal Judge would not grant a change of venue from the Washington DC area swamp, which voted 95% for Biden ?

That Sussmann had a pre typed speech when exiting the courthouse is when I knew my suspicions were true.

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 06-01-2022).]

williegoat JUN 01, 12:22 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

You must be so happy to have posted that in size three type.

When was your first clue that Sussmann would be protected ?

When you found out that three jurors donated to Hillary's campaign ? Was it when you heard that one donated to AOC's campaign ? Perhaps you got a clue when you found out that one juror's child was on a school sports team with the defense council's child ?

Maybe it was when Federal judge Christopher Cooper said he and Sussmann were "professional acquaintances" while at the Justice Department in the 1990s. And the judge's wife represents former FBI lawyer Lisa Page ?

Possibly when the Federal Judge would not grant a change of venue from the Washington DC area swamp, which voted 95% for Biden ?

That Sussmann had a pre typed speech when exiting the courthouse is when I knew my suspicions were true.



Thank you for paying attention.

The left doesn't see this as a corrupt system. Instead, they call it a winning strategy.

After you are disarmed, they won't even have to pretend.
rinselberg JUN 01, 03:41 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

You must be so happy to have posted that in size three type.

When was your first clue that Sussmann would be protected ?

When you found out that three jurors donated to Hillary's campaign ? Was it when you heard that one donated to AOC's campaign ? Perhaps you got a clue when you found out that one juror's child was on a school sports team with the defense council's child ?

Maybe it was when Federal judge Christopher Cooper said he and Sussmann were "professional acquaintances" while at the Justice Department in the 1990s. And the judge's wife represents former FBI lawyer Lisa Page ?

Possibly when the Federal Judge would not grant a change of venue from the Washington DC area swamp, which voted 95% for Biden ?

That Sussmann had a pre typed speech when exiting the courthouse is when I knew my suspicions were true.


I often use that "size three" or BIG text size to differentiate the title or banner that's at the top of a media report. So, that wasn't just because of the acquittal of his Michael Sussmann.

I don't know about any of the remainder of this—what "cliffw" has said. To get to the other side? That's as far as my thinking on it takes me. Because it's all new(s) to me.
williegoat JUN 01, 04:09 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

I don't know about any of the remainder of this—what "cliffw" has said. To get to the other side? That's as far as my thinking on it takes me. Because it's all new(s) to me.


This is why we have leftists. It is the easy path. No effort is required.
One must actively seek the truth, in order to know the truth.
Wise decisions require facts. In order to recognize corruption, one must have enduring moral values.
blackrams JUN 01, 04:51 PM

------------------
Rams

Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun.........