 
     |
| Upside down and inside out. (Page 1/3) |
|
2.5
|
AUG 05, 02:20 PM
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 05, 02:42 PM
|
|
A man named Mike Glover telling "fish stories" about the FBI, or exaggerating or otherwise distorting something involving the FBI?
Did the FBI actually designate this Mike Glover as a terrorist? Or was it something else involving the FBI that Mike Glover is describing here?[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-05-2022).]
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
AUG 05, 03:21 PM
|
|
What it hell else is new....
ANYTHING or ANYBODY the left doesn't like is either an "-ist" or an "Anti-" (insert whatever here), or both.
**** them, **** their labels, and **** their designations !
I'm thinking a good old-fashioned **** -kicking would work wonders to wake the woke.
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
AUG 08, 03:18 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
A man named Mike Glover telling "fish stories" about the FBI, or exaggerating or otherwise distorting something involving the FBI?
Did the FBI actually designate this Mike Glover as a terrorist? Or was it something else involving the FBI that Mike Glover is describing here?
|
|
Was it? Oh the suspense.
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
AUG 12, 02:07 PM
|
|
|
Probly clueless bureaucracy then, huh. [This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 08-12-2022).]
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 13, 05:26 PM
|
|
This video from Mike Glover is labeled as "I am NOT a terrorist. THE FBI DESIGNATED ME A TERRORIST."
Is that overreach on Mike Glover's part? Did the FBI designate Mike Glover as a terrorist, either directly and personally, or by designating whatever group he belongs to as a terrorist organization?
I don't think that's the case. I think he is exaggerating the significance of an FBI internal document, and presenting the document as something other than it is.
The document is listed, at its very top, as a "Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide."
It doesn't outright designate any individuals or groups as terrorists.
This is the conclusion (at the end of it, I guess) that is part of this document. Readers of the document would see this text in boldface.
| quote | | The use of sharing these symbols alone should not independently be considered evidence of militia violent extremism presence, or affiliation, or serve as an indicator of illegal activity as many individuals use these symbols for their original historic meaning other than violent purposes. |
|
I think anyone who is interested in this topic, to the point where they would be motivated to post a 14+ minutes YouTube about it, should want to have a look at this.
So what's "this"..?
It's a fairly brief article. No more than "middling length". Not as much as 14 minutes of reading time, by the look of it. It is:
"Why Historic Symbols Could Also Mean Violence"
| quote | | ... context matters... there is a huge difference between a Gadsden Flag on your neighbor’s front porch and one on a flagpole being used to smash a government building’s windows. |
|
Jamie Cohen for Medium; August 10, 2022.
https://newanddigital.mediu...iolence-69d4abc52c58[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-13-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Wichita
|
AUG 13, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 13, 08:34 PM
|
|
 [This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-13-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
AUG 13, 11:12 PM
|
|
Why do you keep posting this BS?
|
|
|
|
Valkrie9
|
AUG 14, 12:18 AM
|
|
Upside Down, and Round and Round.
Motive.
Provocation.
Propaganda.
Years of it,
the theory being repetition effects belief, sadly influencing few intelligent citizens.
There are thousands of forum bots marketing that bs flavored pablum.
It a plot !
' Watch your step kid, don't step in that ! '
|
|
|
|
