 
     |
| Trump's 2016 election-related lawsuit against Hillary dismissed by 'Clinton' judge (Page 1/3) |
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 09, 06:35 PM
|
|
"Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Hillary Clinton over 2016 election"
Azi Paybarah for the Washington Post; September 9, 2022.
https://www.washingtonpost....wsuit-2016-election/
| quote | A federal judge in Florida has dismissed Donald Trump’s lawsuit against former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, saying there was no basis for the former president to claim that Clinton and her allies harmed him with an orchestrated plan to spread false information that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential race.
Trump “is seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him, and this Court is not the appropriate forum,” Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks of the Southern District of Florida wrote in a scathing 65-page ruling dated Thursday. The judge also wrote about “the audacity of Plaintiff’s [Trump's] legal theories and the manner in which they clearly contravene binding case law.”
Middlebrooks noted “glaring structural deficiencies in the plaintiff’s argument” and said that “such pleadings waste judicial resources and are an unacceptable form of establishing a claim for relief.” |
|
That is how this new report gets underway.
Donald M. Middlebrooks was nominated to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida by President Bill Clinton, in January 1997.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 09-09-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Rickady88GT
|
SEP 09, 07:27 PM
|
|
Yep, corruption exists.
It is EXACTLY this very example of corruption that demonstrates why investigating democrats needs to wait till after 2022 or 2024
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 09, 08:35 PM
|
|
Well... it's not my opinion that this judge should have recused himself.
I think Trump did press this judge to recuse himself from this lawsuit, and that the judge refused to recuse himself.
According to what I saw (it was earlier today) it looks like Trump was trying to steer this lawsuit to the same Judge Aileen Canon that has granted him a special master in the Mar-A-Lago documents case, but for incidental reasons, it went before this Judge Middlebrooks instead.
|
|
|
|
Cheeper2keeper
|
SEP 09, 09:32 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
According to what I saw (it was earlier today) it looks like Trump was trying to steer this lawsuit to the same Judge Aileen Canon that has granted him a special master in the Mar-A-Lago documents case, but for incidental reasons, it went before this Judge Middlebrooks instead.
|
|
Prove it.
|
|
|
|
Rickady88GT
|
SEP 09, 09:46 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Cheeper2keeper:
Prove it. |
|
Seems like a legitimate request
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 10, 01:25 PM
|
|
I've seen enough to convince me that I could find this reporting online and post it here, if I wanted to. This reporting about the jurisdiction that Trump selected to file this lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, and what could be construed from it. Whether he was trying to get it before Judge Aileen Canon, but it went before Judge Donald Middlebrooks because of circumstances that Trump could not control.
But that begs the question of "What would be better for the forum?" Would it be better if I followed through on this myself? Or would it be better if I didn't, and allowed time for your curiosity to nag at you, until you can no longer resist. Until you're tired of losing sleep because you're up all night, thinking about this. Until you can no longer focus on your day job or on any other task or circumstance of your life, because you can't stop thinking about this.
There are plenty of clues in my Original Post. The search words and phrases that anyone could use to find what's been reported about this online, using Google, or DuckDuckGo, or perhaps some other online search engine.
"To search, or not to search."
?
|
|
|
|
Fats
|
SEP 10, 02:01 PM
|
|
Guys, he doesn't need to post proof, he posted "Clues".
What a douche.
|
|
|
|
Rickady88GT
|
SEP 10, 06:20 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
Guys, he doesn't need to post proof, he posted "Clues".
What a douche. |
|
The current generation of democrat is the most hateful and corrupt that I know of. There is no doubt that corruption has been a thing for a very long time, in general BUT this corruption is blatantly open and unrepentant
|
|
|
|
Cheeper2keeper
|
SEP 10, 06:54 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
There are plenty of clues in my Original Post.
|
|
That isn't possible. Clueless people like you can't give clues to anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Rickady88GT
|
SEP 10, 07:03 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Cheeper2keeper:
That isn't possible. Clueless people like you can't give clues to anyone else. |
|
It's like Ray giving history and political lessons
|
|
|
|