Meanwhile in Tarrana the Loonie... (Page 1/2)
MidEngineManiac JUL 11, 11:54 PM


I think 10+ years of fighting these woke entitled ruling-class liberal scumbags is starting to get to me. Wasnt even done watching it and I was so mad I wanted to grab a hatchet and start heading to thunder-retard to tech that ***** a lesson or 2. But, after a coffee I've calmed down enough that I am just hoping a street-car runs the POS over.

DONT think the next "freedom protest" is going to be nearly as peaceful as the last time. I aint NEAR the only one who has totally run out of patience with them.
Wichita JUL 12, 06:32 AM
She is the shop owner and she can mandate whatever and tell you to get the phuck out.

There is no sense in having a reasonable conversation or argument over reasoning. The police officer is probably the only person who really told what needed to be heard.

Yes, there are places even today that require you to wear a face mask. In my point of view the pricks was the dude and the Rebel News reporter.

Yes, she shouldn't have taken the phone as she had no right to do that. Cops resolved the situation. Just leave her be.


MidEngineManiac JUL 12, 11:44 AM
Technically you and the cop are right...IE: No shoes, no shirt, no service.

Problem is, like the reporter asked, That means I can institute a no-black policy due to the theft risk, right ? That means I can institute a no-mask (Naqib, Halloween or diaper) policy for video security, right ?

I can institute a "no underwear showing" policy for health reasons, right ? I can institute a sex-based proper dress code, right ?

Or one of a million other things, right ?

Uh-HUH.

Just as soon as I try and do that see how fast the lefties get just as aggressive and belligerent screaming how I cant DOOOOOO that, and when the shoe is on the other foot see how fast the cops tune changes channels.

It's really got nothing to do with a tiny mean-nothing comic store or some woke nutcase I wouldnt give a Nickle of business to. Whats infuriating is the double-standard and how forcefully it is being pushed and enforced.

(BTW, screw their policies. If the guy has COPD or asthmatic or something then he is legally medically exempt from the face-diaper mandates and policies. We dont know, the video doesnt say, but it is a fact of doing business here. If the store doesnt like it, they can shut up shop). I know that one 100%, I am what the docs call "moderate" COPD.
fredtoast JUL 12, 02:30 PM
A business owner can refuse service to anyone for any reason as long as it is not based on a "protected class" (race, sex, religion, nation of origin).

So a business is FREE to deny service to demand, liberals, progressives.

He is FREE a dress code as long as it does not discriminate based on sex.

Can't believe MEManiac is in favor of giving the government more power to regulate the way this lady runs her business. I thought he was in favor of "freedom from government regulation".
MidEngineManiac JUL 12, 11:09 PM
The way I see it, "business" or "the corpocracy" is as big an enemy to individual rights and freedoms as the government. If not bigger.

The government has been using them as enforcers for a VERY long time, and they happily go right along with it...

They are the tax collectors, the mandate enforcers, the woke-equal "policy" jackboots, the I.D. and document checkers, the reporter-snitches, it goes on and on and on...... And they happily zieg-hiel right along with the program, most of them getting their rocks off on having a little "authority"

5 years ago that twat had never even heard of a face-diaper. Now she thinks she can dictate how someone dresses or what accessory they wear YIPPEE FOR POWER.

If we want true individual freedom back as originally intended, they have to go along with all the rest of the problem children.

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 07-12-2023).]

rinselberg JUL 13, 04:48 AM
Last night I had all the ingredients to stand at the head of an historic revolution... plenty of time and an "attitude."

The only thing missing were some followers.
fredtoast JUL 13, 08:10 AM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:


If we want true individual freedom back as originally intended, they have to go along with all the rest of the problem children.





You are not wanting to increase freedom. You are wanting to limit the freedom of a business owners. You want more government regulation telling them how to run their businesses.
MidEngineManiac JUL 13, 12:55 PM

quote
Originally posted by fredtoast:
You are not wanting to increase freedom. You are wanting to limit the freedom of a business owners. You want more government regulation telling them how to run their businesses.



Ya mean limit their power-trip ? To stop sheet like this

https://www.wnd.com/2023/07...quired-promote-lgbt/

I got no problem doing that. Running a business dont make them some kind of gawd and after the past 3 years antics from them, they have been added to that long list that can KMA.
fredtoast JUL 14, 11:08 AM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:


Ya mean limit their power-trip ? To stop sheet like this .


Not sure what your point is. Go back and read my post about "protected classes". "Religion" is a "protected class". So I agree with this.
MidEngineManiac JUL 16, 02:57 PM

quote
Originally posted by fredtoast:

Not sure what your point is. Go back and read my post about "protected classes". "Religion" is a "protected class". So I agree with this.



I disagree with the entire concept of "protected classes". Double standard. We are NOT free to refuse them, but they ARE free to refuse us.

Fuk dat noize !

(And in a weird twist of fate, I find using the "protected class" card generally results in exactly the kind of resentment and discrimination it was designed to prevent. Another leftist liberal idea success story)

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 07-16-2023).]