Frail Elderly Man Introduces "SECRETARY BOOTY JUICE" (Page 1/3)
randye FEB 20, 05:45 AM
Sodomite Secretary of Transportation gets appropriate introduction:

https://rb.gy/oi0f8o

Joe has to go....

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 02-24-2024).]

82-T/A [At Work] FEB 20, 07:56 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:

Sodomite Secretary of Transportation get appropriate introduction:

https://rb.gy/oi0f8o

Joe has to go....




I love the SNOPES page for this: https://www.snopes.com/fact...cretary-booty-juice/

Desperately trying to tell people that in fact he didn't mean to call him Booty Juice, but unfortunately just mumbled incoherently and it came out sounding like that.

... LOL
BingB FEB 20, 09:57 AM
Good thing he didn't say his name 3 times.
randye FEB 20, 10:42 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I love the SNOPES page for this: https://www.snopes.com/fact...cretary-booty-juice/

Desperately trying to tell people that in fact he didn't mean to call him Booty Juice, but unfortunately just mumbled incoherently and it came out sounding like that.

... LOL




The whole business of so-called "fact checking" has become just another facet of Leftist propaganda.

In this case, trying to tell you not to believe your own eyes and ears.

Video evidence makes the revisionist propagandists task so much harder and Bribery Joe's dementia is at a point where his "filter" isn't going to work very well more and more often and he is going to just blurt out things more often.
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 21, 07:49 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:
The whole business of so-called "fact checking" has become just another facet of Leftist propaganda.

In this case, trying to tell you not to believe your own eyes and ears.

Video evidence makes the revisionist propagandists task so much harder and Bribery Joe's dementia is at a point where his "filter" isn't going to work very well more and more often and he is going to just blurt out things more often.




Honestly... Politifact, and Snopes... it's unbelievable. Everything appears to be "defense against the right." Like... almost every one of their articles seems to be written in such a way. Best way for me to do this is put it in bullets:

- Nearly ever article seems to be "Republicans say this, but this is the real truth"
- Yes, so and so Democrat did "X", but it's not that bad, here's what really happened.


Like... every article seems to be designed from the perspective of "defense of Democrats against Republicans," ... and also, "attack on Republicans."

RARELY... RARELY do you see a fact check from either of those two sites that's specifically written the other way. That's because all of their employees are leftists. So whether they are even aware of the way they write things... that is the narrative they are pushing.

The PolitiFact ones are probably the most ridiculous between the two. I've quoted TWO of them as a source in two responses here within the past week. Both of those articles said "MOSTLY FALSE" on whatever the claim was... and then proceeded to talk about how the claim was actually true. The term mental gymnastics truly... truly applies here. They literally say it's false, and then go on to say how it's completely true... but then find some tangential thing to say something was misunderstood, and then use that to say it's "MOSTLY FALSE" ... which is utterly hilarious.

The only "fact checker" that had been even remotely critical of Biden, was CNN during that short period where it was being run by someone who wanted to bring CNN back to the center (who then got subsequently fired).


And to that point... Biden has been lying on almost every single speech he makes, and yet... the fact checkers have all disappeared:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/n...en-admin/ar-BB1iel67

"...apparently fact-checkers are mostly on a four-year sabbatical at this point. And it’s pathetic."
cliffw FEB 21, 08:24 AM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
Politifact, and Snopes ... QUOTE]

The predecessors of the "Ministry of Truth".
ray b FEB 21, 09:56 AM
Frail Elderly Man VS fat ugly man with dementia and is mean nasty and wicked

as joe is not a crook or a traitor nor near as greedy as a rump and lies far less

I see why the right needs to invent BS about him like this NOTHING BURGER

while the rump can't stop creating his own BS in excess ALL BY HIMSELF
williegoat FEB 21, 12:23 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

Frail Elderly Man VS fat ugly man with dementia and is mean nasty and wicked

as joe is not a crook or a traitor nor near as greedy as a rump and lies far less

I see why the right needs to invent BS about him like this NOTHING BURGER

while the rump can't stop creating his own BS in excess ALL BY HIMSELF
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 21, 03:50 PM

quote
Originally posted by williegoat:




He can't be that dumb as to just blurt that out... what do you think he actually meant by that? Or do you think he literally meant that he sold state secrets?

Also... I really don't want to know what "booty juice" actually is... haha...

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 02-21-2024).]

williegoat FEB 21, 07:36 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

He can't be that dumb as to just blurt that out... what do you think he actually meant by that? Or do you think he literally meant that he sold state secrets?



I have to assume that is what he meant. That is why he had documents at the Penn Biden Center. I'm sure you are aware of the ties to China.

Watch his eyes as he says, "I started off without you." Who do you think he was looking at? Someone is coaching him, like a trained dog in a movie. Watch the reaction of the people around him. He was off script until someone put him on track. "All kidding aside..." and "anyways..." are like "Not a joke" to ol' Joe.