Florida / Federal Election Case (Page 1/1)
82-T/A [At Work] AUG 01, 07:35 AM
Thought this was pretty interesting... a very conservative (not in the political sense) judge has been assigned to a Federal election case that's trying to halt a lot of the manipulative actions that the Democrats are taking this year to cook the books like they did during the last election under the guise of COVID. The fact that it's gone to the Southern District Court of Florida is a good sign (for Republicans).

Official complaint: https://miamiindependent.co...iorno-v-Mayorkas.pdf

Article: https://miamiindependent.co...ashley-mood y-others/


For those who have no actual legal background, but pretend to be lawyers (cough, BingB), a few take-aways... depending on how the judge rules, should she decide to take the case, the following might occur:

- Require the clearing of illegals from voter rolls
- Reinforce that attempting to register illegal aliens is illegal
- Reinforce several existing laws, that force organizations to halt their activity

.. but because this is a Federal district court, it will have implications across the entire state, but could potentially be appealed and move up to a higher district (would Democrats risk that?), which very well may result in further states being forced to clear their voter rolls of illegals and invalid addresses. It may even set rules (which are already defined) which prevent NGOs from performing the certain actions they are now. EDIT: If anything then goes on to the Supreme Court, it could have further implications which will likely result in a similar ruling nation-wide.

It could also lead to charges (unlikely) for Myorkas and others.


She may decline to even hear the case... but a lot of good could come out of this. It almost seems futile because Florida has exactly 1 million more Republican voters than Democrat voters... but I think everyone is hoping the ruling is favorable, and gets appealed.

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 08-01-2024).]

williegoat AUG 01, 10:13 AM
There was a ruling by the 9th circuit court in AZ a couple of weeks ago on a somewhat related matter. I didn't bother posting about it because, much like a joke I won't repeat here, I didn't feel like explaining it three times.

https://www.votebeat.org/ar...roof-of-citizenship/
ray b AUG 01, 10:31 AM
poll tax and literacy test redux and lets undue the felon voting
so they can purge the voters esp the demo and indie ones

jeb did that in 2000 insuring the fix for his bro W
up held by the crooks on the high court

the Gop does love reruns

reminder the rump ''won'' last time in fla so no need to cheat

I do note every Gop idea about voting is to limit or restrict votes
make it harder to vote and eazyer to reject people's votes

they have never ever had any plan to allow every one eligible to vote
or make voting quicker or eazyer
ray b AUG 01, 11:22 AM
https://hartmannreport.com/...oter-suppression-d75

First, the background.

When Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp was Secretary of State — the state’s top elections official — and running against Stacey Abrams for Governor in 2018, Abrams’ organization had registered 53,000 people (70% African American) to vote. Kemp put those registrations on hold so they couldn’t vote in the 2018 election, which he won by 54,723 votes.

But that was just the beginning for Kemp. By the year prior to the 2018 election he’d purged a total of 1.4 million voters from the rolls, claiming he was just removing people who’d died or moved. On a single night in July 2017 he removed half a million voters, about 8% of all registered Georgia voters, an act The Atlanta Journal-Constitution said “may represent the largest mass disenfranchisement in US history.”

they do love RERUNS
olejoedad AUG 01, 11:44 AM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

https://hartmannreport.com/...oter-suppression-d75

First, the background.

When Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp was Secretary of State — the state’s top elections official — and running against Stacey Abrams for Governor in 2018, Abrams’ organization had registered 53,000 people (70% African American) to vote. Kemp put those registrations on hold so they couldn’t vote in the 2018 election, which he won by 54,723 votes.

But that was just the beginning for Kemp. By the year prior to the 2018 election he’d purged a total of 1.4 million voters from the rolls, claiming he was just removing people who’d died or moved. On a single night in July 2017 he removed half a million voters, about 8% of all registered Georgia voters, an act The Atlanta Journal-Constitution said “may represent the largest mass disenfranchisement in US history.”

they do love RERUNS



You should offer proof that eligible voters were purged from the voter database, otherwise the term 'disenfranchised' is ingenuous.
BingB AUG 01, 11:53 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


You should offer proof that eligible voters were purged from the voter database, otherwise the term 'disenfranchised' is ingenuous.



Why not just read the article he posted.


"Investigative reporter Greg Palast hired the company Amazon uses to verify addresses and ran the names and addresses of those 534,000 people Kemp purged that July day through their system: 334,000 of them, most Black, had neither died nor moved. But they’d sure lost their right to vote."

"In 2020, when Stacey Abrams again challenged Kemp for the governorship, Kemp’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (pronounced “Raff-ens-purger”) purged another 309,000 voters from the rolls; Palast hired the company again and found that 198,351 of them had neither died nor moved."
ray b AUG 01, 02:14 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


You should offer proof that eligible voters were purged from the voter database, otherwise the term 'disenfranchised' is ingenuous.



you con-tinue to ask for things you should know
or be able to find eazy as a google

but your cult does not want you to know
like the real proved election cheats are 2000 fla for BuSh2 by high court
and 1-6 by the rump
BingB AUG 01, 02:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:
but your cult does not want you to know




I think it is more that they don't really care about individual voters. For example OleJoe wants to take away citizens rights to vote for their Senators and give that power to THE GOVERNMENT. They feel that the government knows more than the individuals. Trump is even telling them that they won't have to vote anymore if they elect him.