|
ecm mods (Page 1/3) |
|
cartercarbaficionado
|
MAY 21, 04:42 AM
|
|
thinking about a ecm upgrade for the 88 v6 formula 4 speed since I'm getting a little tired of the stock ecm deciding to randomly gain and lose power with no codes or anything and would let me do the larger intake and some quieter but freely flowing exhaust to go with the suspension mods I've got in the mail (just fixed the front suspension and decided it needed some better parts)
|
|
|
Jason88Notchie
|
MAY 21, 07:39 AM
|
|
With all due respect I think you should sort out your wiring nightmare first. Starting from a known good Fiero ECM first. Unless you plan in gutting every wire out of that car and starting from scratch.
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
MAY 21, 08:11 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by cartercarbaficionado:
thinking about a ecm upgrade for the 88 v6 formula 4 speed since I'm getting a little tired of the stock ecm deciding to randomly gain and lose power with no codes or anything and would let me do the larger intake and some quieter but freely flowing exhaust to go with the suspension mods I've got in the mail (just fixed the front suspension and decided it needed some better parts) |
|
So, I kinda went over this in the other response to Yellow88. Full disclosure, I've never swapped out an ECM before... I mean... I've never installed an aftermarket ECM before. But I have done plenty of wiring harnesses and it's not too bad.
For me personally, I think re-doing the wiring harness and replacing the ECM with a more modern system is NOT bad advice. With everything being new, the Fiero runs quite well. But it was designed during a time when ECMs were really just starting to come into their own. The ECM we use in our cars was the first *real* computer control of a vehicle. The prior standard ECM that came in cars started showing up in 1980 with ESC (Electronic Spark Control) and usually controlled a fuel metered carburetor. Then they had some super-basic TBI-controlled ECM that controlled things like the Cross-Fire injected TransAm / Camaro and Corvette in 81-82, and controlled the TBI unit for trucks and a couple of passenger cars.
The MPFI system we used was first used in late 1983 in cars like the Olds-88 or the Cavalier... and it didn't really change through the entire production of the Fiero through 1988. Just a year later, 1989... they had a much, much newer and better designed system with the 7730. Just looking at how computers advanced from ~1984 to 1989... we went from an 8-bit Bus / processor with the 8088 microprocessor at 4.77 Mhz to a 16-bit bus and 32-bit processor with the 80386 at 33 Mhz. Literally worlds away in terms of performance.
The big thing that always seems to get harped on is that in order for a modern ECM to work well, the car needs to be running well already (meaning it can't have any timing, fuel, or compression issues). But... if the motor already runs "ok," then an upgraded ECM will definitely improve everything.
Anyone who's converted an older MPFI system to a newer ECM, or even upgraded to an SFI-compatible system will tell you the performance and drivability is night and day.
Below is a copy/paste (and slightly modified) version of what I posted to Yellow-88's thread.
----------------------------------------------------
My personal opinion is that probably the "best" solution for reliability and improvement in performance and drivability is to upgrade to a MicroSquirt system. If you want to keep your distributor (like I'm doing), then you'll also want to make use of an MSD 6EFI box. The MSD 6EFI is used to convert the signal from analog to digital (if I remember correctly), and of course... also provides a whole host of other benefits including multiple spark discharge (which itself improves idle and higher RPM performance). Anyway, the MicroSquirt system operates at a much higher baud rate than any of the older GM ECMs, including the 7730 and responds much more quickly to changing conditions. It can also make use of the digital EGR.
If you want to upgrade to the MegaSquirt 3, it allows you to convert from a Multi-Port Fuel Injection system, to a Sequential-Port Fuel Injection system. This has several advantages, including better idle, improved and lowered emissions, lowered fuel consumption, and improved horsepower in the low-to-mid RPMs (it has no effect, good or bad, in the higher RPMs). Note, you don't have to change anything... but you will be replacing the entire engine wiring harness (with a new harness).
This is the link to the MicroSquirt System: https://www.diyautotune.com...foot-wiring-harness/ This is the link to the MSD 6EFI Controller: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/msd-6415
Couple of things... the first is that if your engine does not run well now, then it won't run well with a new ECM. A new ECM doesn't really "fix" problems... so make sure your car runs as good as it can in stock form before attempting to replace the ECM. Assing your car does run appropriately... there are a TON of benefits you can expect by going with the MicroSquirt:
- Improved Idle (disables cold start injector) - Improved fuel economy - Improved horsepower everywhere - Improved (reduced) emissions - Improved drivability (better throttle response, etc.)
Another nice thing about the Fiero, for what it's worth, is that the gauges (except for the shift light), all totally work independently from the ECM. This means that they get all of their signals directly from specific sensors on the engine that, while they may ALSO feed the ECM (some of them), they are independent and will continue to work regardless of what ECM you put in there.
EDIT: When you're doing all this, consider replacing your factory ignition coil with an aftermarket (higher spark output one). They're cheap... like ~$50 for a higher output one. One of the problems is that in the upper RPMs, the factory coil is unable to produce the necessary spark / charge in order to support necessary combustion in the higher rpms. Like... above 4,500 rpms you start to see a loss in performance. I'll say this, people see improved performance JUST by swapping out the ignition coil... engine continues to pull hard in the upper RPMs. https://www.fierostore.com/.../Detail.aspx?s=51065
EDIT 2: MicroSquirt won't do SFI... you'd have to get the MegaSquirt 3. I'm planning on doing this swap (after I know everything else is working), but I'm going to be using the Fast EZ-EFI 2.0 system.
--------------------------------------------------------------
If you're going to go with one of the aftermarket ones, like a Fast-EZ or Holley, etc... you're going to want to use the MSD 6EFI system, and you'll want to use this diagram I made:
Bottom line, the Fiero's signal from the ignition control module to the original ECM is analog, and the newer systems want it to be digital. The MSD 6EFI does that for you, while providing a ton of other benefits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT: I'll just say that if you have a wiring nightmare, it might be better to just completely start over with your wiring harness. Remove the whole damn thing and either replace it entirely, or rebuild it sensor to sensor.[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 05-21-2024).]
|
|
|
Yellow-88
|
MAY 21, 09:35 AM
|
|
Hi
So let’s agree that the stock ECM is primitive by modern standards and antique by 1990’s standards. Yes a standalone system like the micro squirt is the ultimate but….
Yes, an out of tune poorly maintained engine runs crappy. Wiring issues, possible shorts or open circuits can happen as well. But none of that is what I’m “feeling”.
By saying “it’s time to consider an ECM upgrade” I mean this is something I’ve considered for quite some time but never got high priority. I have read all the posts on the subject and the 7730 seems logical but I still have a dangling question.
Yellow sat for a couple of years outside, on jack stands. The mouse house, a multi-level, multifamily structure was conveniently built directly on top of the primitive ECM.
Yellow fires up and runs like it always did. With the extensive show level cleaning complete, it’s time to seriously consider the most basic ECM upgrade.
My dangling question is; What PROM do I use in the 7730? Is the one from a 1989 2.8 liter 5 speed Chevy Barretta a good choice?
Yellow-88
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 21, 09:58 AM
|
|
I would say yes, that's a good prom.
For best results, I would have a competent tuner do a ride along tune after you get the car on the road. The tuner can tailor the tune to your car with great precision for best driveability.
I would recommend the 7730 over the aftermarket choices, simply because it's ultra reliable. The new stuff may be faster, but the 7730 is fast enough, and it has decades of history as to its reliability.
Would you be modifying your existing harness?
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
MAY 21, 10:40 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by Yellow-88:
Hi
So let’s agree that the stock ECM is primitive by modern standards and antique by 1990’s standards. Yes a standalone system like the micro squirt is the ultimate but….
Yes, an out of tune poorly maintained engine runs crappy. Wiring issues, possible shorts or open circuits can happen as well. But none of that is what I’m “feeling”.
By saying “it’s time to consider an ECM upgrade” I mean this is something I’ve considered for quite some time but never got high priority. I have read all the posts on the subject and the 7730 seems logical but I still have a dangling question.
Yellow sat for a couple of years outside, on jack stands. The mouse house, a multi-level, multifamily structure was conveniently built directly on top of the primitive ECM.
Yellow fires up and runs like it always did. With the extensive show level cleaning complete, it’s time to seriously consider the most basic ECM upgrade.
My dangling question is; What PROM do I use in the 7730? Is the one from a 1989 2.8 liter 5 speed Chevy Barretta a good choice?
Yellow-88 |
|
Hey Yellow, I think you're responding to the wrong thread. This was one that Carter Carburetor Aficionado made, which while similar, wasn't really related to your specific ask. I'm not a mod, just a conscientious observer.
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
MAY 21, 10:43 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:I would say yes, that's a good prom.
For best results, I would have a competent tuner do a ride along tune after you get the car on the road. The tuner can tailor the tune to your car with great precision for best driveability.
I would recommend the 7730 over the aftermarket choices, simply because it's ultra reliable. The new stuff may be faster, but the 7730 is fast enough, and it has decades of history as to its reliability.
Would you be modifying your existing harness?
|
|
Joe, can't he also use some of the on-line tuner software that's available... e.g., he data logs on his laptop, then uploads it to the software which automatically leans out or enriches the fuel map where it needs it (based on the logs), then re-uploads it. Wash-rinse-repeat until it's basically perfect?
|
|
|
Yellow-88
|
MAY 21, 11:02 AM
|
|
Hi
Basically it's the same subject.
So .... a 7730 with a PROM from a 2.8 Berretta repined to the existing harness and a digital EGR conversion should get me close? A fine tune on the PROM is "extra" and there are a couple of ways to do that? Has anyone done it recently? Any previously unmentioned snags to run into?
Yellow-88
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
MAY 21, 11:40 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by Yellow-88: Hi
Basically it's the same subject.
So .... a 7730 with a PROM from a 2.8 Berretta repined to the existing harness and a digital EGR conversion should get me close? A fine tune on the PROM is "extra" and there are a couple of ways to do that? Has anyone done it recently? Any previously unmentioned snags to run into?
Yellow-88 |
|
If you want to do it yourself... you'll have to buy an EPROM programmer / burner: https://www.amazon.com/PRG-...ammer/dp/B00HS6EWFS/
It's been a long time since I've done this, but at least back in the day, you had to pull the sticker off the little window, and blast it with UV to wipe the existing data on the EPROM before you can load new data onto it. Obviously, you want to pull the old data off first (download it) before you wipe it. It might be different for the 7730, so I hope Joe will chime in since he's done it before.
But then you'll need to get some GM Tuner software like TunerCat: http://www.tunercat.com/
Honestly... you might just be better off going with a much newer ECM, like from a 1993-1995 Camaro / Firebird with the 3.4 V/60. It's re-flashable... you don't have to constantly remove an EPROM, and you can get rid of the EGR entirely. But your mind is made up, so I won't push.
|
|
|
cartercarbaficionado
|
MAY 21, 02:21 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by Jason88Notchie:
With all due respect I think you should sort out your wiring nightmare first. Starting from a known good Fiero ECM first. Unless you plan in gutting every wire out of that car and starting from scratch. |
|
I'm pretty much going to. my harness is correct for the stock ecu but it just keeps doing weird stuff. sometimes it sets the idle speed at 3k rpm and sometimes 750 at random with no code or explanation for it since I know it's not a vaccum leak, as far as I can tell the ecu just randomly starts to make up its own readings that have no basis in reality since all the sensors check out fine and it's a new replacement harness from a running driving 86 fiero
|
|
|
|