Fiero kept, another Fiero acquired... (Page 12/13)
82-T/A [At Work] MAY 16, 04:08 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

I know. We have discussed our different views before. I meant to mention that.




I'm not incredibly biased on what I drive, but what I own usually has to be American just because it's cheaper / easier to work on.

No doubt the Toyota is a solid vehicle... but I saw some shade thrown against the 4.6, and I needed to defend it. Hahah...


If you had a Tacoma and a F-150, both with AWD... who would win the truck pull?
https://youtu.be/0jnleuYqFwY?t=455
cliffw MAY 16, 05:03 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
If you had a Tacoma and a F-150, both with AWD... who would win the truck pull?



Todd, your link, which appears to me to look to be an income gathering ??? click bait. It does not mention an AWD Tacoma P/U or a F150 P/U. Because, they do not exist, and never had. I have been wrong before.

An F150 AWD ? Sacrilege. I have been wrong before.

An F150, against a Tacoma ? Many factors determine the results. Weight being one. A Ford V8 vs a 6 cyl ?
82-T/A [At Work] MAY 16, 05:11 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Todd, your link, which appears to me to look to be an income gathering ??? click bait. It does not mention an AWD Tacoma P/U or a F150 P/U. Because, they do not exist, and never had. I have been wrong before.

An F150 AWD ? Sacrilege. I have been wrong before.

An F150, against a Tacoma ? Many factors determine the results. Weight being one. A Ford V8 vs a 6 cyl ?



LOL... 4x4. Don't get testy! I'm sure there's an occasion when a Toyota wins a truck pull...

cliffw MAY 17, 07:53 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
Don't get testy!



Too late, .


quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
In 2001, Ford improved the standard SOHC V8 with what they called the PI intake and heads, which stood for performance improver. Just to emphasize, this wasn't the "performance" engine. This was just the standard Crown Victoria engine ...



I can not knock the Crown Victoria. The standard Fiero engine was the 2.5, .


quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
If we're talking "PERFORMANCE" versions of the engine, they also sold a DOHC version of the motor which was 4 valves per cyl, which was 320hp and 300 ft-lbs with a much flatter torque curve. This was in the Mercury Marauder, Mustang GT, Lincoln Aviator, and a few other vehicles.



This thread's discussion led me to explore what engine was in the Police Interceptors. They were equipped with a 3.3 hybrid (318hp), an available 3.0 EcoBoost put out 400hp. New to me, the Police Responder came equipped with a 3.5 EcoBoost which also gave 400hp under the hood but with a muscular 500-ft lbs of torque.


quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
Just to emphasize... the 4.6 SOHC V8 was one of the base motors you could get in the F-150, if you didn't get the straight-6 (which I'm not sure if they even sold it anymore at that point). Just kind of unfair to compare I think, haha...



I wasn't, ... intending to introduce an unfair comparison. I was mentioning another option.

I am a big fan of the Ford straight 6. My 85 CJ has an almost identical engine. I also like the Chevy straight 6.

82-T/A [At Work] MAY 17, 08:34 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

I can not knock the Crown Victoria. The standard Fiero engine was the 2.5, .



My Crown Victoria is loaded, basically every single option that was available that year, except the sunroof (which was a special-order option), and the performance gears. With a 3.33:1, I would usually run very low 15s with the GTECH (yes, I still have one, haha) back in the day when I cared. It's a totally stock 4.6 SOHC V8 with the factory performance improver heads. Only thing I'd done to it at that time was an ECM reflash, a larger throttle body, larger mass air flow sensor (80mm), and a larger air box (from the Mercury Marauder). Obviously, I took out the spare and anything I had in the trunk and left it with my buddy, but the car has full leather bench seats, the extra layer of factory sound deadening underneath the plush carpet, and so many other totally unnecessary things. It even has the factory subwoofer... so it's absolutely a heavy Crown Vic...





quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

This thread's discussion led me to explore what engine was in the Police Interceptors. They were equipped with a 3.3 hybrid (318hp), an available 3.0 EcoBoost put out 400hp. New to me, the Police Responder came equipped with a 3.5 EcoBoost which also gave 400hp under the hood but with a muscular 500-ft lbs of torque.



To be clear, that's current for the Ford police/duty vehicles. It's a 3.5 Twin Turbo V6... really powerful. They also sell the twin turbo in civilian duty, but as is always the case with Ford, when you get the police version, it always comes with a ton of things that the civilian one does not. Chrysler doesn't really do this with the Dodge Charger. With Chrysler, in almost every case, they just take their performance version, and offer a stripped-down version of the chassis to get rid of all the options, and then do a few things like replace the floor mats with rubber, etc...

With my Crown Victoria, I tried to upgrade it as much as possible with police hardware... to be clear, not police "looking" stuff, like no lights or teardrop stuff or any of that nonsense. I absolutely do not want it to look like a cop car. But I upgraded it with all the other performance stuff. For example, the Police Interceptor was the only version where you could get an aluminum driveshaft. So I swapped it right out with my steel one.



I also installed all the radio interference straps, the jack mount from the older cars (so it mounts in the fender well, and not in the trunk), I upgraded the door lighting with the lights from the older 1995-1997 models (98-02 just got a reflector), upgraded to the factory Ford blue silicone hoses that were optional on the P71. Gosh... so many different things. There were even a lot of luxury things that you could get from the Lincoln Town Car which swapped over (usually to deaden the sound), like little inserts in the core support that minimized harmonics from the fan and engine... I even swapped over the safety / impact components from the P71 that were added later to protect you in a 100mph crash to prevent the fuel tank from being punctured. It's one of the few cars that can withstand a 75mph impact front and back. I also took the exhaust system from the Grand Marquis Limited Sport Edition. The Police Interceptor has a slightly better exhaust, but it's too open and loud. The LSE version of the exhaust is chambered, but designed to be super-quiet while you're just cruising around ... but when you stomp on the gas, it wakes up... I mean, it screams, like a roar.


The website is old... I haven't updated it in like over a decade, but it's all here: https://www.pontiacperforma...t/car02CrownVic.html

Some of the images are broken because I upgraded from a Windows host to a Linux host, and as you know... Linux is case sensitive, so a bunch of the images broke. I just have to go back and fix it one day.

This is what it looks like...



As you can see, not at all police looking. Also, I swapped out the cornering lights with the one from the Grand Marquis. It has actual cornering lights. So... when you use the turn signal, it will direct a corner headlight in the direction of where you are turning. It's pretty sweet. Because Ford would often re-use stuff... they found it easier to just include the Crown Victorias, Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Cars with this wiring, even though the Crown Victorias never came with it. So literally all I had to do was replace the light, and plug it in, and it just worked. Even the existing relay was there.

Honestly, I love that car... but to be completely honest, it literally just sits in the garage. I haven't driven it in like 3 months, and when I did, it was just to take it around the block. I think I've driven it less than 40 miles on the past 2 years.

I envision one day I have a large enough garage where I can have all these cars easily parked and ready to go... and not squirreled away in the side of the garage, and then I can just hop in one whenever I feel like it and take it for a drive.

Hopefully none of this comes out like a brag... I've spent a lot of work keeping it looking stock and trying to find upgrades from the other platformed vehicles. The car is basically worth nothing... it has no real value. I don't even think I could sell it for $5 grand if I wanted to... but I love the car.



quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

I am a big fan of the Ford straight 6. My 85 CJ has an almost identical engine. I also like the Chevy straight 6.



The AMC 4.0L Straight Six... really strong engine. Worst thing Chrysler could have done was get rid of that engine and replace it with the 3.6. The long crank and inline 6 is what gave it that torque. They could have fixed the emissions... but they didn't want to put in the effort.

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 05-17-2023).]

cliffw MAY 17, 10:06 AM
Todd, I am impressed with your Crown Vic and your passion of it.


quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
The AMC 4.0L Straight Six... really strong engine. Worst thing Chrysler could have done was get rid of that engine and replace it with the 3.6. The long crank and inline 6 is what gave it that torque. They could have fixed the emissions... but they didn't want to put in the effort.



Not quite true. AMC had the 4.2. Chrysler replaced it with the 4.0. Almost identical to the 4.2, which they owned by buying Jeep from AMC, but the 4.0 was fuel injected, and put out better abilities.
82-T/A [At Work] MAY 17, 10:30 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

Not quite true. AMC had the 4.2. Chrysler replaced it with the 4.0. Almost identical to the 4.2, which they owned by buying Jeep from AMC, but the 4.0 was fuel injected, and put out better abilities.



Can you take the crank, rods, and pistons from the 4.2 and put it into the 4.0 to get the larger stroke (or bore?) and the increased displacement with the more modern components of the fuel injected 4.0? Would be interested to see what a more reliable version of the larger 4.0 would look like.

Does it have roller lifters too? My grandfather had a Jeep Cherokee, and it would break the tires loose when you were just cruising at 30 some miles an hour and stomped the gas. It was a fantastic motor...
cliffw MAY 18, 10:03 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
Can you take the crank, rods, and pistons from the 4.2 and put it into the 4.0 to get the larger stroke (or bore?) and the increased displacement with the more modern components of the fuel injected 4.0? Would be interested to see what a more reliable version of the larger 4.0 would look like.



All very good questions. I have a good answer. I don't know, . Wouldn't the 4.2 be the larger engine ?

I do know what you are alluding to. I do know all small block chevy engines are essentially the same block, with different rod stroke length, larger pistons, larger intake/exhaust valves and intake ex, and other upgrades.

To be honest, I am not sure why the fuel injected 4.0 is the desirable upgrade. I do not know the output specs, (hp,torque, wheel torque). I do know the 4.2 carburetor was crap. A Ford two barrel MC2100 is what I run. Very good carb ! However, climbing a steep hill, without fuel injection, does cause gas delivery issues. Nothing like being on a steep hill, stalling, with a standard, when you need to use the clutch pedal, the brake pedal, and the gas pedal, all at the same time. Ask me how I know, . (I now run a automatic tranny.)


quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
My grandfather had a Jeep Cherokee, and it would break the tires loose when you were just cruising at 30 some miles an hour and stomped the gas. It was a fantastic motor...



I would be interested to know more about it. Year, engine size, other.

Todd, you might like to know about Clifford Performance.

Started by an actual race car driver who raced against other sixers and V-8s. He won many trophies. His company motto became "6=8".

One day when my Wife lets me to also have a rich girlfriend, I am going to buy a Cliff's performance engine. As an added bonus, my name will be emblazoned on the aluminum intake and the aluminum valve cover. (stock valve covers are plastic, and crap)
82-T/A [At Work] MAY 18, 10:43 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

I would be interested to know more about it. Year, engine size, other.

Todd, you might like to know about Clifford Performance.

Started by an actual race car driver who raced against other sixers and V-8s. He won many trophies. His company motto became "6=8".

One day when my Wife lets me to also have a rich girlfriend, I am going to buy a Cliff's performance engine. As an added bonus, my name will be emblazoned on the aluminum intake and the aluminum valve cover. (stock valve covers are plastic, and crap)



I think I was in high school at the time. My grandfather has long since passed, and I have no idea where that car went.

I think it was maybe a ~1986? It was a 4-door Jeep Cherokee with 4x4, and the 4 liter straight 6. It was an orange / brown color (maybe two tone... might have even had faux wood stickers on the side). Brown interior. He bought it because he owned a cabin in West Virginia, and it's a long drive up his mountain to get to it. I drove it a couple of times, and really got a kick out of it. Steering was rather wild... felt like it was all over the place (this was 1995-1996, so about 10 years old)... but yeah, if I was cruising down the backroads at 30 in Northern Virginia, and slammed on the gas, it would break the rear tires loose. It had lots of torque. I drove it maybe two or three times, never used the 4x4 because I didn't know how to and didn't need to.

When I bought my 2002 Ford Explorer Sport back in... 2009? I was actually looking for a used 2-door Cherokee. But I couldn't find a single one that didn't have many hundreds of thousands of miles on it. Even then, they were asking absurd prices. I went with my 2002 Ford Explorer Sport (in early 2009) because it only had 32k miles, and was basically immaculate. I needed a reliable car with low miles that was still fun / sporty, but that I could haul stuff with as I renovated my house, and could have more than 1 passenger (I got rid of my Solstice for it).
TheDigitalAlchemist MAY 18, 11:30 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Todd (and anyone else that might be interested),

This happened yesterday.


Just had to share.

Rams



That's awesome!