Courtroom 'ZEST' from one of the best. U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth. (Page 2/2)
rinselberg JUN 25, 06:30 PM
. .

I changed my mind.

I guess I could have put it all in just one Topic or thread.

But that doesn't make me want to reconsider anything else that I've said here.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 06-25-2021).]

randye JUN 25, 07:29 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:


He ought to start New Topics himself instead of constantly "leeching" off of mine.





We have been over this nonsense with you before.

YOU DON'T OWN ANY THREADS HERE

Nobody does.

Beyond that, WTF is it with your weird and improper capitalization of random words in sentences?

The garbled, meandering, pointless, garbage you post is always rife with atrocious grammar.

That is bad enough on it's own but the whack-job, random, capitalization really puts the putrid "cherry" on top.



quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:


That's what discussion is for. The Post Reply function. For other forum members to fill out the discussion and move a new topic forward from its setup or initial presentation. To "matriculate it downfield" ("it" being the topic) and towards the goal line of intellectual balance and completion.







YOU DON'T OWN ANY THREADS HERE

YOU DON'T GET TO DETERMINE WHERE THEY GO OR HOW THEY END

Nobody does.

You LEFTISTS never stop trying to control the narrative and other people's speech.

OH, and your atrocious grammar is once again exemplified in your ridiculous, improper and meaningless mixed metaphor; "matriculate it downfield"

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-25-2021).]

Rickady88GT JUN 25, 08:11 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

. .

I changed my mind.

I guess I could have put it all in just one Topic or thread.

But that doesn't make me want to reconsider anything else that I've said here.




Rinse, you can say whatever you want. Then I guess deal with the fallout later, but the motive behind what you say is not difficult to see. You post so many "New Topics" because you do not get views from topics you care about. Creating new topic Threads about the same stuff does not generate interest. People are creatures of habit and may for some unknown reason click on any or all topics. So the number of "views" may reflect how many times a thread is opened, but does not tell how many different people looked at the thread OR tell how many people have an interest in the topic. You can boost the views count by looking at your own threads several times a day. Your motive is clear, but does your choice of conveying your message work, that isn't as clear. And at that, the number replies and views aren't even high. Most likely half dozen people on the forum account for the total of views and comments in these related threads,..... including me.....and I literally have no interest in the criminal trespassing of Government property on Jan6.
blackrams JUN 25, 11:42 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

Rinse, you can say whatever you want.




I agree, anyone can say just about anything (within the rules). Whether or not anyone else gives a damn what they think or say is a totally different topic. But, less than credible sources and twisted or spun news does nothing but lower the reader's expectations. I have very low expectations and yet continue be to surprised and how low some can go.
I agree with the first year drama student comment from another forum member. It's not even entertaining much less informative.

Rams
Rickady88GT JUN 26, 12:09 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


I agree, anyone can say just about anything (within the rules). Whether or not anyone else gives a damn what they think or say is a totally different topic. But, less than credible sources and twisted or spun news does nothing but lower the reader's expectations. I have very low expectations and yet continue be to surprised and how low some can go.
I agree with the first year drama student comment from another forum member. It's not even entertaining much less informative.

Rams



Ok, so you (as I have) aided in boosting view counts and replies but have no interest in the topic. If I understand you correctly, you just agreed with what I have said to Rinse.
blackrams JUN 26, 07:58 AM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:


Ok, so you (as I have) aided in boosting view counts and replies but have no interest in the topic. If I understand you correctly, you just agreed with what I have said to Rinse.



Pretty much, I think some folks just like seeing their name lit up. I assume it's an ego thing but, don't know the individual personally. Wasn't long ago the first page had IIRC 13 topics on page one by the same poster. Shrug.

Rams
sourmash JUN 26, 08:22 AM
There's a lot of views just to see who has applied the ker-SLAP! to the jowl, or to decide if the viewer is going to bother doing it.
I usually can't make it through his posts and just move to the replies.

Then I view again to proof read for errors. Then I view again later to see if the board just isnt refreshed and not showing a message from someone. Then I view again to laugh at myself.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 06-26-2021).]

blackrams JUN 26, 10:41 AM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

There's a lot of views just to see who has applied the ker-SLAP! to the jowl, or to decide if the viewer is going to bother doing it.
I usually can't make it through his posts and just move to the replies.

Then I view again to proof read for errors. Then I view again later to see if the board just isnt refreshed and not showing a message from someone. Then I view again to laugh at myself.




Gosh, pretty sure there's a name for that kind of self abuse..................

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 06-26-2021).]

sourmash JUN 26, 11:07 AM
I don't want to know the definition. Because they'll just use it against me if I have to admit I knew how to define it.
rinselberg JUN 26, 01:00 PM
number_of_replies++;