Human History Gets a Rewrite. I'd read this book if I still read books. (Page 1/1)
rinselberg OCT 20, 09:52 AM
How's this for openers?

quote
The Dawn of Everything is written against the conventional account of human social history as first developed by Hobbes and Rousseau; elaborated by subsequent thinkers; popularized today by the likes of Jared Diamond, Yuval Noah Harari, and Steven Pinker; and accepted more or less universally. The story goes like this. Once upon a time, human beings lived in small, egalitarian bands of hunter-gatherers (the so-called state of nature). Then came the invention of agriculture, which led to surplus production and thus to population growth as well as private property. Bands swelled to tribes, and increasing scale required increasing organization: stratification, specialization; chiefs, warriors, holy men.

Eventually, cities emerged, and with them, civilization—literacy, philosophy, astronomy; hierarchies of wealth, status, and power; the first kingdoms and empires. Flash forward a few thousand years, and with science, capitalism, and the Industrial Revolution, we witness the creation of the modern bureaucratic state. The story is linear (the stages are followed in order, with no going back), uniform (they are followed the same way everywhere), progressive (the stages are “stages” in the first place, leading from lower to higher, more primitive to more sophisticated), deterministic (development is driven by technology, not human choice), and teleological (the process culminates in us).

It is also, according to Graeber and Wengrow, completely wrong. Drawing on a wealth of recent archaeological discoveries that span the globe, as well as deep reading in often neglected historical sources (their bibliography runs to 63 pages), the two dismantle not only every element of the received account but also the assumptions that it rests on. Yes, we’ve had bands, tribes, cities, and states; agriculture, inequality, and bureaucracy, but what each of these were, how they developed, and how we got from one to the next—all this and more, the authors comprehensively rewrite. More important, they demolish the idea that human beings are passive objects of material forces, moving helplessly along a technological conveyor belt that takes us from the Serengeti to the DMV. We’ve had choices, they show, and we’ve made them. Graeber and Wengrow offer a history of the past 30,000 years that is not only wildly different from anything we’re used to, but also far more interesting: textured, surprising, paradoxical, inspiring.



That's from a book review of "The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity" by the (late) David Graeber and David Wengrow.

The book review, by William Deresiewicz, was just published in The Atlantic, under the title "Human History Gets a Rewrite: A brilliant new account upends bedrock assumptions about 30,000 years of change."

The book review. Read-o-Meter 12 minutes.
https://www.theatlantic.com...ory-humanity/620177/

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 10-20-2021).]

williegoat OCT 20, 11:31 AM
I am going to suggest that this is another attempt at revisionist history, on a grand scale. Graeber was an unabashed far left political activist who was a major influence on the "occupy" movement, in the mold of Francis Piven.

His widow is from St Petersburg. No, not the one by Tampa.

St Petersburg is the home of the I.R.A. No, not the one in Belfast.

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 10-20-2021).]