KYLE RITTENHOUSE TRIAL (Page 1/16)
randye NOV 06, 05:13 PM
You remember him. The young man that shot 3 people during a riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin

4 days of the trial and so far the prosecution has called 3 witnesses that verified Rittenhouse's self defense claim and 1 witness that admitted that the first person, (Rosenbaum), that was shot and killed after he chased the defendant and cornered him in a parking lot and grabbed for his gun had just been released from a psychiatric hospital that day.

The judge also ruled that the violent criminal history of one of the people Rittenhouse shot, (and survived) WILL be allowed after the prosecution objected.

1 juror was removed by the judge because of a joke he told a bailiff.

OOPS...make that 2 jurors gone. Another one was excused for medical reasons. (The trial started with 8 alternate / extra jurors)

The defense hasn't even put on it's case yet and this trial is almost already won on the facts for young Mr. Rittenhouse.

Of course you never know what a jury is going to do.

Anyone else following this?

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-06-2021).]

maryjane NOV 06, 08:14 PM
To be honest, only slightly following.......
sourmash NOV 06, 08:18 PM
Definitely imterested.
Definitely self defense.
Unsure if a weapons charge viability
Rickady88GT NOV 06, 09:50 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Definitely imterested.
Definitely self defense.


Agreed

quote

Unsure if a weapons charge viability


ABSOLUTELY a problem for him. I don't think it should be, but what he did was transport a weapon across States lines with a possible motivation to commit a crime. The charges are the mind child of politically prosecutors.
maryjane NOV 06, 11:02 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

ABSOLUTELY a problem for him. I don't think it should be, but what he did was transport a weapon across States lines with a possible motivation to commit a crime. The charges are the mind child of politically prosecutors.


What crime are you referring to specifically?

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-06-2021).]

gtjoe NOV 06, 11:13 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

ABSOLUTELY a problem for him. I don't think it should be, but what he did was transport a weapon across States lines with a possible motivation to commit a crime. The charges are the mind child of politically prosecutors.



This is Factually incorrect. He never crossed state lines with the firearm. It was purchased and stored in Wisconsin.


Also the judge has already eluded to the fact he may dismiss this charge due to the law being void for vagueness. Not that this charge has anything to do with the self defense claim. He would still have a statutory right to self defense regardless of whether he were to be found guilty of this charge.
blackrams NOV 07, 03:20 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:

Anyone else following this?




As much as the major news sources allow.

Rams
williegoat NOV 07, 06:24 AM
I am interested in the outcome, but not the trial.
sourmash NOV 07, 08:26 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
As much as the major news sources allow.
Rams



This is a reason you and I will never be able to converse philosophically about current issues from an informed viewpoint.

Trusted independent media sources cover the press coverage of the major media propaganda sources from a critical viewpoint. Critical of them, so you don't even have to listen to controlled media to know what they're pushing. Independent media doesn't use terms like "mostly peaceful protests", "insurrection" and "deadly White supremacist rally".
blackrams NOV 07, 08:34 AM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


This is a reason you and I will never be able to converse philosophically about current issues from an informed viewpoint.

Trusted independent media sources cover the press coverage of the major media propaganda sources from a critical viewpoint. Critical of them, so you don't even have to listen to controlled media to know what they're pushing. Independent media doesn't use terms like "mostly peaceful protests", "insurrection" and "deadly White supremacist rally".


Thanks, I really wasn't interested in conversing with you anyway.

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-07-2021).]