|
RANDYE SAID NO FED FELONY MURDER RULE (Page 1/1) |
|
ray b
|
JAN 14, 11:14 AM
|
|
RANDYE SAID NO FED FELONY MURDER RULE IN THE CLOSED THREAD
''Sorry you Leftist "Lionel Hutz", but FEDERAL LAW, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 says that you're WRONG
Stop getting your whack-job legal opinions from your dopey sailing website or Democratic Underground''
WELL HERE IT IS https://www.justia.com/crim...icide/felony-murder/
he posted the common murder law NOT felony murder BTW justia is a lawyer level site no BS no spin just the law
note ''The felony murder rule is a rule that allows a defendant to be charged with first-degree murder for a killing that occurs during a dangerous felony, even if the defendant is not the killer. The felony murder rule applies only to those crimes that are considered “inherently dangerous,” as the rationale underlying the felony murder rule is that certain crimes are so dangerous that society wants to deter individuals from engaging in them altogether. Thus, when a person participates in an inherently dangerous crime, he or she may be held responsible for the fatal consequences of that crime, even if someone else caused the actual death. ''
''The felony murder rule is an exception to the normal rules of homicide. Normally, a defendant can be convicted of murder only if a prosecutor shows that the defendant acted with the intent to kill or with a reckless indifference to human life. Under the felony murder rule, however, a defendant can be convicted of murder even if the defendant did not act with intent or a reckless indifference; the prosecution must show only that the defendant participated in a felony where fatalities occurred. ''
btw window chic's DEATH QUALIFY'S UNDER BREAKING AND ENTERING and her action QUALIFY EVERYONE ELSE IN THE BUILDING ILLEGALLY FOR MURDER CHARGES sorry if you do not like the law that does not change the law AND IN FAR TOO MANY CASES KIDS DO GET CHARGED WITH MURDER WHEN SIMILAR CASES HAPPEN
LETS TRY AND KEEP THIS ABOUT THE LAW NOT POSTERS
|
|
|
LitebulbwithaFiero
|
JAN 14, 11:19 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by ray b:
LETS TRY AND KEEP THIS ABOUT THE LAW NOT POSTERS
|
|
"Rules for thee, not for me" much?
|
|
|
ray b
|
JAN 14, 11:25 AM
|
|
NO I mean about the law
I guess that is hard for some to understand we live in a country ruled by law not whim so understanding the law is important
whims belief hope dreams ect do not effect the law
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 14, 11:46 AM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by LitebulbwithaFiero:
"Rules for thee, not for me" much? |
|
Agreed. IMO, this thread violates forum decorum.
Also, Randy is inflammatory (to put it lightly--I don't even know how he hasn't been banned), but when a thread is closed, that's typically for a reason, not to create children threads following it.
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JAN 14, 11:54 AM
|
|
I AM OUTRAGED TOO ABOUT SOMETHING!!!
|
|
|
Cliff Pennock
|
JAN 14, 03:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|