wack putin for world peace ? (Page 1/4) ray b FEB 18, 02:14 AM https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...agues_Under_the_Seas Jules Verne had the idea but why not limit the attack to the war monger themself not the men and machines just the HEAD idiot responsible for starting the mess a few billion for some subs missile tweaks and the drones even with a small error rate would anyone really miss putin think of it as evolution in action the subs are not national property of any one as the updated base to launch missiles tipped with drones instead of nukes from a 1/2 doz boomer subs to take out threats to world peace funded by bake sales begging go fund me no government control peoples project for rational government international BY BLOWING UP IDIOTS no one place to nuke subs are in deep ocean WE ARE funded by bake sales and we keep taking out idiots who are threats to peace as needed olejoedad FEB 18, 07:23 AM And who is responsible for deciding the target? Doesn't the decision maker the become the next threat to world peace? When would the 'threats to world peace' stop? Do you remember the fate of Captain Nemo? Can I have a say in who to take out? 82-T/A [At Work] FEB 18, 07:27 AM quote Originally posted by ray b: https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...agues_Under_the_Seas Jules Verne had the idea but why not limit the attack to the war monger themself not the men and machines just the HEAD idiot responsible for starting the mess a few billion for some subs missile tweaks and the drones even with a small error rate would anyone really miss putin think of it as evolution in action the subs are not national property of any one My question is... who would replace him? Is the enemy you don't know, worse than the enemy you know? ray b FEB 18, 09:57 AM if they act like putin a mob thug just boom next the subs are run by volunteers on a short term it is not a long term power base the idea is to not kill bad leaders but only those who are a threat to others like hitler or pol pot current military leadership in what was called burma are running amuck rocket man china the idea is kill a nut before they can start a war one dead nut instead of thousands to multi-millions sourmash FEB 18, 10:27 AM Putin nd Russia don't start wars by lying to their citizens so that they support starting a war. That's the job of the DC and English govts. olejoedad FEB 18, 11:22 AM Funny how Putin, Kim and Xi weren't problems during the previous administration. rayb, why do you suppose that is? sourmash FEB 18, 11:29 AM And even before that Obama said to a Russian (Medvedev ?) That he'd have more flexibility to work with the Russians in his 2nd term. So Russia wasn't bad before they built Nordstream 2 which bypasses Ukraine and will prevent the Uke govt from stealing gas and oil as it passes thru to Germany? Jake_Dragon FEB 18, 12:24 PM So if we don't agree with someone then they should be put down? While I do not support his agenda I would not go so far as to want him dead. I think this thread has gone too far already. Perhaps some of you should think about what it looks like when this pops up in a search. maryjane FEB 18, 12:26 PM Better not miss. Retaliation is apt to be severe and swift. Archduke Franz Ferdinand ring a bell? ray b FEB 18, 01:28 PM quote Originally posted by maryjane: Better not miss. Retaliation is apt to be severe and swift. Archduke Franz Ferdinand ring a bell? Retaliation at who the subs are independent crowd funded staffed by short term volunteers they do not belong to any country or group of countrys or the UN they belong to the world citizens for less idiots in government so what if they kill a few a bit before they really need killing the subs have no real mass destruction ability just small limited BOOMS and are as likely to hit a post coup trump as a putin or the new pol pot or idiot iran guy with a nuke I would nominate the ruling military in what was burma AS A GOOD TARGET