 
     |
| Pfizer tracking pill? (Page 1/2) |
|
Hudini
|
MAY 21, 07:32 AM
|
|
Remember when we laughed at the conspiracy theory that Bill Gates was behind 5G nanites in your vaccine? Crazy, yes? Well not so fast. Listen to the Pfizer boss:
|
|
|
hammer
|
MAY 21, 08:19 PM
|
|
|
Have to say I'm not surprised to see this...
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
MAY 23, 02:51 PM
|
|
"Imagine the implications of that"
I'm getting tired of asking myself this so often.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
MAY 23, 03:49 PM
|
|
Is this a "quantum leap" from the monitoring and data collection and storage devices that patients are already wearing or have inside them as implants?
A quantum leap, or just a little more of the same?
He described these miniaturized wireless transmitters as small enough to be swallowed when packaged within a capsule. Like the familiar gel capsule for orally administered medicines and supplements.
He didn't say small enough to be administered by syringe, or administered as a nasal spray, which may be the method for some of the Covid and other vaccines and boosters that are already in the works.
|
|
|
Patrick
|
MAY 23, 10:25 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
He didn't say small enough to be administered by syringe, or administered as a nasal spray, which may be the method for some of the Covid and other vaccines and boosters that are already in the works.
|
|
Shush! Don't ruin a perfectly good conspiracy story!
|
|
|
cliffw
|
MAY 24, 09:40 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
He described these miniaturized wireless transmitters as small enough to be swallowed when packaged within a capsule. Like the familiar gel capsule for orally administered medicines and supplements. |
|
So, you claim that because it can not be injected, it is less intrusive. Things I swallow can be zhit or pissed out. Oral medicine does not last forever.
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
MAY 24, 10:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
He didn't say small enough to be administered by syringe, or administered as a nasal spray... |
|
Ah, all is well, no implications then.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
MAY 24, 12:48 PM
|
|
This is a concept. Judging by the remarks from the Pfizer CEO, it's not something that's ready yet for widespread use. I couldn't say, judging by the Pfizer CEO's brief remarks in that video, if there's even a viable prototype that's being tested. He talked about it needing some serious investors ($).
The concept is that the capsule that the patient swallows to take a dose of his or her medicine automatically creates an electronic record when the capsule dissolves in the patient's stomach.
The purpose would be to create a more inherently accurate record of the patient's treatment. Maybe the nurse gives the patient a capsule of their medicine, but forgets to record it. Or it could be the patients themselves, in outpatient scenarios. These wireless-enable capsules would create a more reliable record of the patient's treatment, for their doctor to review.
For certain medical conditions, where each single capsule of the patient's medicine could represent a significant cost ($), the extra expense of adding the wireless recording function to each capsule would be worth it. Or, the criterion could be the importance of creating assurance that the patient has taken exactly "N" doses of the medicine, over the course of "X" days of treatment, each dose having been separated from the previous dose by an interval of "Y" days or hours.
The concept practically sells itself.
I see it having potential application to human space missions, where the crew members might need to be swallowing capsules of special medications to better cope with the extremes of space travel, and extended periods in surface or subsurface human habitats on the moon or Mars... the most likely first such destinations. But that's beyond the more obvious scenarios of earth-bound hospitalizations and outpatient therapies.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 05-24-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Jake_Dragon
|
MAY 24, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
MAY 24, 03:02 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
it's not something that's ready yet for widespread use. I couldn't say, judging by the Pfizer CEO's brief remarks in that video, if there's even a viable prototype that's being tested. He talked about it needing some serious investors ($).
|
|
Ah, all is well, no implications then.
again...
|
|
|
|