F. Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore Collapsed! (Page 1/3)
theogre MAR 26, 12:45 PM
A ship hit it. just web search for more.

While cars can use the I95 Tunnel, Many Private & Commercial vehicles Can't because of HAZMAT Banning like any w/ just 1 15-20# Propane bottle must use 495 695 & that bridge.
I'm told Nearest HAZMAT allowed bypass is Rt40 or Rt1 but are out of way or traffic is going to crawl for Years at "rush hour" & more times @ every crossing even for cars stuffing the Tunnel(s).

------------------
Dr. Ian Malcolm: Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
(Jurassic Park)


The Ogre's Fiero Cave

[This message has been edited by theogre (edited 03-26-2024).]

TheDigitalAlchemist MAR 26, 01:44 PM
Saw the video, thats crazy! There were construction workers and vehicles on it at the time....
Valkrie9 MAR 26, 11:33 PM
The Fib's bullsheet story, for all the suckers out there willing to slurp their spoonful of nasty.
Watching the video, the container ship was making more than ten knots, far beyond the speed limit, the throttle was opened full, the smoke from the funnel the evidence, the rudder was turned to change course into the bridge pylon deliberately, terrorism, same as 9.11.
Planes into towers, ships into bridges, trains, planes, automobiles.
' We're sorry, we don't know what happened, we made a mistake, Captain Edward Smith III was not at the helm, being reclined in his quarters, having been on a bender for the last few days, it was Achmed, the second mate, the Yemeni, a true believer, a prankster, always with the funny business. '
The purpose of the Fib's lie is to misinform the people, simply.
Nothing to see here, move along !
Concealing the truth from the citizens who pay for truth, a ripoff by ripoff artists, conmen, grifters, pickpockets, thieves.
Explain to me why the entire crew isn't in custody, being deprived of their constitutional rights, their Geneva rights, tortured during interrogation, to discover the truth.. ' this hot poker will have you singing matey ! '
' Osama Bin Laden ! We did it to harm America ! Death to America ! '
That would mean an undeclared war, again.
They did it to show how weak Biden_Joe is, obviously weak.
Cliff Pennock MAR 27, 02:11 AM
In the footage you can see the ship lost power twice before hitting the bridge. There's no On/Off switch a terrorist could simply flick so that hints to a true problem. Also and more importantly, the captain sent out a mayday minutes before the boat hit, saving a lot of lives since they were able to stop most traffic in time. There were only a few cars still on the bridge which had no idea what was happening.

If it was a terrorist attack they would not have send out a mayday. Everything points to it being "just" a terrible accident.
maryjane MAR 27, 04:11 AM
I agree. An accident. My guess would be an electrical problem or contaminated fuel.. I hate the loss of life and even if one was to survive the fall, hypothermia would set in within minutes in that cold cold water. The black smoke was probably the crew trying to light off the emergency generator. If the report I read earlier is correct, the captain or pilot ordered the anchor dropped but a ship of that tonnage wou;ld drag anchor for hundreds of yards. It won't take long for a salvage company or Navy to clear a passage for ships but as Ogre said, it's going to be a huge disruption of commuter traffic and for freight trucks going to and from the warehouses. Till the wreckage is cleared, it will mean disruption in supply chain for weeks, if not months to clear out just the backlog.

Terrorist wouldn't have chosen 1am when traffic was light on the bridge.

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 03-27-2024).]

theogre MAR 27, 12:08 PM
Many Bridges on the East Coast are "controlled" or Owned by Amy Corp of Engineers regardless who collects tolls or maintains upper sections & I'm betting they won't take long to clear the Channel by cutting large sections to move then cut more to scrape later. Or 1 crane to hold then cut parts off w/ hyrdo shears very fast like many tearing down a lot of buildings now.

Ground Traffic is another story & will have problems likely for years before get a new bridge. Many used 695 just to bypass Baltimore entirely.

As to protecting the bridge... Watch Video from NTSB a few hours ago... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwgOHpZlxvc
Was basically Nothing there to protect. Unlike many others w/ huge blocks of concrete known as Dolphins & other terms, "islands" around supports, or in many areas Deep Draft ships simply Ground themselves moving out of the Channel because river etc is Dredged only for the Channel so very little or no extra protection needed on many Bridges. Example: For Decades ACofE was Fighting Delaware to Dredge DE River Channel from 40 to 45 feet deep so "Post Panama" & other Ships can get to Philly & Wilmington Ports & oil refineries. Outside of the Channel almost every large ship will Ground even before got the Deeper Channel. Shallow Draft items like many Barges can Ground easy in many parts of DE River along the Channel so they avoid traveling out of the deep channel too. Even then some DE River bridges & many others have Dolphins etc. to stop or deflect a ship.
Valkrie9 MAR 28, 01:03 AM

Full throttle, steered directly into bridge !
' Rolling Coal, Ghost Mode ! Tee Hee ! Ha Ha ! LoL ! '
Fibs are telling you to disregard what you think you see, and trust them to be honest.
fierofool MAR 28, 08:41 PM
The black smoke didn't appear until after the first and during the second power outage and could have been that the pilot went full reverse to stop the ship and that would have put a tremendous load on the engines. Some of the videos were speeded up in order to show the full span from the time of the first power outage until the crash, thus making it appear that the ship was at full speed. But there will always be conspiracy theorists.

And now the liberal media is smearing Francis Scott Key because his family owned slaves.

[This message has been edited by fierofool (edited 03-28-2024).]

BingB MAR 29, 09:09 AM
I don't know if there is something suspicious about this incident, but I 100% know for sure it is not terrorism.

"Terrorism" does not work if the victims do not know it is an act of terrorism. And as far as I know no terrorist groups have claimed responsibility.
maryjane MAR 29, 01:04 PM

quote
Originally posted by BingB:

I don't know if there is something suspicious about this incident, but I 100% know for sure it is not terrorism.

"Terrorism" does not work if the victims do not know it is an act of terrorism. And as far as I know no terrorist groups have claimed responsibility.



I would come closer (maybe) to believing an act of sabotage by a crew member that had personal reasons...harbored a grudge or just didn't want to go back to sea yet, but didn't want to actually jump ship and lose his job or standing within the maritime union...
Terrorism..false flag..a hard no.

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 03-29-2024).]