Foriegn Website says Obama may have been Muslim after all... (Page 4/8)
spark1 FEB 07, 01:39 AM
Was previous post deja vu twice? Same words three times? Maybe it's just getting late.
maryjane FEB 07, 02:44 AM
Was previous post deja vu twice? Same words three times? Maybe it's just getting late.
Jake_Dragon FEB 07, 05:25 AM
Was previous post deja vu twice? Same words three times? Maybe it's just getting late.
IFLYR22 FEB 07, 11:40 AM

quote
Originally posted by spark1, maryjane, Jake_Dragon:

Was previous post deja vu twice? Same words three times? Maybe it's just getting late.



HA ha ha ha...

I normally prefer not to post when it comes to politics (I call pathetic's), but I do read a lot of it.
On a serious note, Why would BHO want to release his personal information (such as his birth cert, school records, etc...)? The more people concentrate on these issues, the more distracted they are. Therefore, the more he can "work" with all the "Birthers" distracted. It is to his benefit not to release this information. Sounds like a strategy to me.

Wave your hands in the air to distract your adversary. While they are looking at your hands, kick them in the groin.

-Dave
Boondawg FEB 07, 12:19 PM

quote
Originally posted by IFLYR22:

Wave your hands in the air to distract your adversary. While they are looking at your hands, kick them in the groin.

-Dave



Sneaky bastard.
The "Rules of War" clearly state, "No Crushed Nuts!"
Or it should!
maryjane FEB 07, 12:33 PM
I personally believe he is qualified to hold the office, but, as I tried to explain to some of the liberals here, over 1/2 the voters in the south (according to several polls) do NOT believe he is an American citizen. Elections--especially in the case of re-elections, are not usually "won". Usually not a whole lot of difference in the big issues between the 2 candidates. They are lost-- because of tiny mistakes by a candidate. Just ask the liberal Senate candidate in Mass--she lost due to a list of small errors on her part. She didn't make a single or couple of big errors in her campaign--she lost because of the cumulative effect of a bunch of small errors--and that's how it is in national elections as well --almost all of the time. Obama, has absolutely nothing to gain, and possibly everything to lose by keeping all his records sealed, and it is one of a myriad of mistakes he should be tallying up and keeping track of.

Liberals can laugh off the birthers all they want, but they really should be imploring their guy to take this issue completely out of the equation by ordering all his records released--not just having a govt official release a birth certificate picture.

Little things lose elections--rarely big things--and they all add up.

Some will vote against Obama because of this issue.
Some will vote against him because of his bowing to foriegn dignitaries.
Some will vote against him because of him not forcing congress to televise healthcare debates.
Some will vote against him for his handling of the auto industry.
Some will vote against him for his global warming debacle in Copenhagen.
Some will vote against him for his mixed signals regarding his religious affiliation.
Some will vote against him for his percieved tie to Blago.
Some will vote against him because of his head of Homeland Security's gaffe following the attempted plane bombing.
On and On.

It's a very long list--of very small things, and he's only 1 year into his 1st term. Add the big things into the mix, (jobs-deficit, Iraq/Afgan wars and it could spell trouble for him in a close election, so why take the chance?

But hey, I hope he and the rest of the liberals docontinue to ridicule the "birthers". I hope they continue to attack the Supreme Court.(You think those justices won't remember that next time they rule on something?) I hope they continue to take TEA lightly. I hope Obama continues to bow to every foreign dignitary. Little things--each swaying voters.

And, brings up a question I have been wondering about.
When was the last time an incumbent President did NOT carry the south and still won re-election?
I do not know the answer to that question, but it might be interesting to find out.

[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 02-07-2010).]

Tigger FEB 07, 03:34 PM

quote
Originally posted by Formula88:


Pay attention. I already said the not giving gifts has been extrapolated into not celebrating Christmas. It's already been rethought. You should try thinking for the first time before posting.



Hey wise ass, you're the one who said Obama refuses to celebrate Christmas and someone asked you to explain. All YOU came up with is Obama has said they don't give their kids gifts and that is "extrapolated" as "doesn't celebrate Christmas." My point is, since when is giving gifts to you're kids really have to do with the meaning of Christmas. Sorry, the "extrapolation" doesn't hold water. What's this "It's already been rethought" crap, you didn't call the "extrapolated point" as bunk.

[This message has been edited by Tigger (edited 02-07-2010).]

Formula88 FEB 07, 03:57 PM

quote
Originally posted by Tigger:


Hey wise ass, you're the one who said Obama refuses to celebrate Christmas and someone asked you to explain. All YOU came up with is Obama has said they don't give their kids gifts and that is "extrapolated" as "doesn't celebrate Christmas." My point is, since when is giving gifts to you're kids really have to do with the meaning of Christmas. Sorry, the "extrapolation" doesn't hold water. What's this "It's already been rethought" crap, you didn't call the "extrapolated point" as bunk.




Swing and miss. Better luck next time.
Like I said - AGAIN, I had read he doesn't celebrate Christmas and upon further research found a People magazine interview that says he doesn't give presents to his kids for Christmas. So, yes, that has likely been extrapolated, exaggerated, spun, distorted, whatever you want to call it, into doesn't "celebrate" Christmas. I posted as much when I found it. So get over it. I'd already pointed out that inconsistency by the time you rushed in to try to be clever. You missed your window of opportunity. Stop trying to salvage some kind of slam, any kind of slam, just so you can think to yourself - wow, you sure showed me.

partfiero FEB 07, 04:22 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


yes the whole birther campaign is a BIG LIE

even the bogus link said born in Honolulu

so all you got is a moslem step dad checked his own religion's box on a form

btw the law is mom is american any kid is a full citizen
no matter where it is born
so the whole birther BS is a BIG LIE from the start



My comment was a joke, never have voiced my opinion on the birth issue.
He is f'ing this country up, and it only has to do with him being a Progressive, nothing to do with anything else..other than he is also a liar, thief and a cheat as is most politicians from both sides of the isle.
He is a far cry from the liberals of the past.

[This message has been edited by partfiero (edited 02-07-2010).]

Tigger FEB 07, 04:35 PM

quote
Originally posted by Formula88:


Swing and miss. Better luck next time.
Like I said - AGAIN, I had read he doesn't celebrate Christmas and upon further research found a People magazine interview that says he doesn't give presents to his kids for Christmas. So, yes, that has likely been extrapolated, exaggerated, spun, distorted, whatever you want to call it, into doesn't "celebrate" Christmas. I posted as much when I found it. So get over it. I'd already pointed out that inconsistency by the time you rushed in to try to be clever. You missed your window of opportunity. Stop trying to salvage some kind of slam, any kind of slam, just so you can think to yourself - wow, you sure showed me.



Funny... ok, you want a slam then here's a slam. Do something constructive like writing your Republican representative(s) and ask them to hold reviews and question Obama's citizenship. And while at it, ask them to ammend the Constitution to prevent certain people with certain religions, born as or not, from being President.