I DIDN'T (GRRR)

You got me there

When I sleep the sun is out

[This message has been edited by Jake_Dragon (edited 03-26-2002).]

Here we go again. Rant, rant, rant....

At least they were there. Could have been killed before they made production at all.

Not mine. Herein, I think, lies rayb's source of anger....

They were down for quite a while. You could move to Europe, you know. Gas (Petrol) is over two dollars a liter, or litre, as they spell it over there.

Hooray and Hooray again. See below.

Keep in mind, all, that rayb has not mentioned all the child molesters outside the church. True, about 70 priests (out of about 700) have been accused of molestation, and, undoubtedly, many are guilty, but only when they are proven beyond a reasonable doubt. rayb has already convicted them, of course, because of his disdain for organized religion of any kind.

rayb has also neglected (as have the rest of the liberal press) such stories as the former principal in the Amherst MA middle school, who fondled an overweight 13 year old boy's "breasts." He is a homosexual who was trying to adopt a four year old boy. The four year old told Dept of Social Services personnel that they watched "funny movies" and played "bouncing games."

The fact that there are so many priests in trouble probably lies with one of two situations. Homosexuals have long worked to infiltrate the church, and have attempted to bring discrimination suits (in violation of the First Ammendment), or simply to apply covertly. Becoming a priest would be a natural for the latter. Second, I'm sure that there were many in the 60's and 70's with some gender confusion going on, and the church seemed to be the perfect place to sqelch their leanings. The liberal press has no desire to explore these avenues, as they are still smarting from having to report the connection between NAMBLA and two men who lured a ten year old away from his neighborhood with a bicycle, then beat, killed, and had sex with the boy's body before encasing him in concrete and dumping him in a river. The Boston Globe (Owned by the New York Times) has had no problem with the activities of NAMBLA (The North American Man Boy Love Association), except when similar activities are perpetrated by priests.

No, it doesn't make it right. The point is, we should be able to feel reasonably safe for our children anywhere, not just in church.

O btw liberal press are all owned/run by corprate PIGS and all of them are con"S
watch FOX NEWS if you like the nazi point of view.
USA major networks are middle of the road it is just FOOLs out passed the ditch on the right can't tell the difference or see the road let alone the center of it

1) This was a thread asking "why there must be a God", you got it backwards.

2) ray, you're right. Everyone is liberal commies and we're all out to get you. The world revolves around you.

Child pornography is not for the Federal Governemnt to limit??? Stay away from my kids, ray.

What IS a "BLUE NOSE FOOL," exactly? That must be one of your Miami Beach sayings.

Freedom of the press is not limited, except by the press themselves. They all have a left wing socialistic slant. Having sex with children is "helping the children sexually," except if it's done by a priest is their point of view. My point is that it's wrong no matter who does it!

The New York Times (and their holdings), Time Warner, Disney/ABC, et. al. have monopolized the media outlets of print and broadcast, and are trying to do the same with the 'net. In this regard, most of the American population don't know where to get the other side of the story. Censorship is coming from the press itself.

Wrongo here, boy. Trafficking images and video of children who don't even have the suffix "teen" attached to their age is the evil within our own borders. If this is OK with you, ray, like I said, stay away from my children....

Huh?

Actually, we quite rightly do not want our every move broadcast to the enemy on CNN.