Well, I was hoping it wasn't going to come to this. Let me first apologize to the people of this board because this type of behavior is uncalled for. I have been as nice and as professional as I could be for as long as I could be. But now Loyde has gone too far. The Situation: You might all remember that I started an L67 Fiero swap a couple of months ago for Dizmon. The link is here: http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/055969.html Anyway, since Dizmon supplied a 4T65-E transmission for this swap we had no choice but to use an OBDII computer. At the time, I did not have the ability to reprogram the OBDII PCM so I started shopping around for someone to do it for us. Well I am on the 3800 e-mailing lists as well as the Grand Prix and other 3800 message boards where I have been seeing this gentleman out of Texas named Loyde who runs FastFieros. In several different posts and mailings by him in addition to what he has listed on his website, he makes himself out to be the "guru" of tuning OBDII 3800 PCMs for the Fiero engine swaps. He claims that he has vast experience in both the swaps and the PCM programming. So I took all of this to mean that this person would probably know what he was doing when it came to doing the PCM for my swap. For the record the engine and transmission we used in our swap were BONE STOCK so tuning should have been a breeze, just removing trouble codes and VATS amoung a few other simple things. I emailed Loyde asking him if he could do all of these things for our swap using our 2002 PCM that came with the engine. His email response was this:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 10/1/2004 Sure….The code in the computer will be 2000 in order to kill the VATs. 1999 and 2000 are the only ones for the L67 hacked with no theft enable. All the other stuff is no problem. The EVAP will function with the codes removed. Price is $125 shipped…. Sometimes I can do a PCM in 24 hours, sometimes its 48 hours… Loyde |
|
So, therefore I decided to to have Loyde do the PCM programming since it was going to be "no problem". Notice no where in this email does he make mention of there being an issue with reprogramming the 2002 PCM with 2000/1999 code. I will come back to this later. Well I got the PCM from Loyde and installed it into the car and on the first test drive the alternator failed so I had to replace it. However, in addition to that there were some emissions trouble codes set. These trouble codes were SUPPOSED TO BE REMOVED since I told Loyde this swap was going into a Fiero and not using any of the OBDII specific sensors and emissions devices. His response email was this:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/12/2004 Sure I can turn off all the codes that show up if they are in the list of DTC’s.. Now, I cant just randomly turn off codes… Lets say P0146 is listed in the below list. Lets say I set it to OFF and no error reported. It wants to write code somewhere in the Hex for that. Problem is, this list also applys to V8 code. HPT built a generic list of codes rather than sort them by OSID. DHP is sorting theirs by OSID so if the code exist in that OSID of that PCM, it is safe to turn off. Even DHP using GM’s MemCal engineering cannot just turn off every code in the list for the same reason. I need the Service Number and Hardware Number on that white tag on the PCM. Thanks, Loyde |
|
This is the very first email where Loyde explained to me the problems with the software he was using to tune the OBDII computers. Loyde did cross-ship me a PCM with the emissions codes removed and I had to send him the one I had back once I got the new one. This cost me and my customer $20 in total shipping to this point on top of the $125 we paid for the custom tuning in the first place. At this point I was not upset because I was tidying up a few other things on the car so it was no big deal. However, I did notice that the transmission was not shifting that great, actually it was shifting lazy, sometimes it even felt like it was slipping. The shifts were lazy enough that eventually a code P1811 was set which means Maximum Adapt Long Shift, in other words, the PCM was "thinking" it was adding the maximum amount of pressure to the trans but the shifts were still taking too long to complete. Unfortuneately this trans code and issue did not show up until Loyde had already shipped off the new PCM so there was nothing I could do about the trans code. At this point, I consulted my transmission builder about the issue because after all, this was a transmission code. It just so happens that my trans builder has done a swap exactly like this into his 96 Cutlass only he was using a 98 GTP PCM and used HP Tuners to program it. He gave me some tests to run by hooking up a pressure gauge to the trans and running the tests by using a scan tool to command a certain % of trans pressure everything checked out well within spec. However, when I terminated the diagnostic test the pressure dropped 25psi below spec at idle. Driving around without the scan tool yeilded similar, less than spec pressures. I consulted my trans builder with this data and he began to ask me questions about who reprogrammed the PCM and what software they were using. I told him I was having Loyde do it and he was using HP Tuners. My trans builder immediately told me to tell Loyde there was an error in the programming that could be related to the Torque Management tables in the programming. I emailed Loyde with this information I got from my tranny guy and here was his response:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/15/2004 One of the problems might be the code. The PCM is a late model PCM. 03 might have adaptive shifts, but the 97-02 does not. I know my 04 Series III does have adaptive shift for sure. The code in the PCM is 2000 to avoid the Passkey issues. HPTuner claims to have resolved the Passkey with Version 1.5.0, but had to release 1.5.1 one day later because of a problem with Passkey. Most likely should have setup a PCM from 99-01 like I normally do and try that on your wiring. I setup all my installs with 99 wiring, and 99 PCM code. Wiring was the same really 99-02. I know some 98 wiring can use the 99-02 PCM’s as well. I have already reshipped you a PCM. It is changed for the codes you indicated. Temp changes also. The performance shift mode is firmed up, but not that much compared to what DHP changes it to. The normal mode is just that still, stock. If you are in normal mode and experiencing a problem, but is either the PCM/CODE do to the wiring, or the wiring, or the transmission has issues internally. Just call if you want to chat about it. Loyde |
|
Loyde admits in this email that the problem could be in the code. But notice this is the first instance where Loyde recommends that we should have started out with using a 1999 PCM. Unfortuneately Loyde had already sent the PCM so I decided to just try it out and see if it affected anything. The emissions codes were gone but the trans issues were still there. I also reported my testing data to Loyde and here was his response:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/16/2004 Guy, I have no idea. You are the first in many PCM’s have personally tested and used, and programmed for others to have this P1811 code…. Here is a pic of the torque management table. As you can see, I do turn off these on just about every Fiero installed 3800SC PCM because there’s no wheel sensors for TCS or torque management. You have another PCM that will be there Wednesday with the same code but different PCM, but same Service number and hardware number. IF I had known these problems you are having Monday, I would have recommended using a 99-02 which is 09361735 / 09357440 to try instead on the PCM... These problems you are having could very well be the late model PCM. When you send the PCM you have there today back, I have a customer car here today that I can install that PCM to and drive to see if I happen to get the exact same results. Ship that PCM tomorrow priority mail so I get it Friday. Loyde |
|
At this point I was very pleased that Loyde was working with me to resolve this issue and it started to sound like we had this problem nailed down. However, the next couple of emails I got from Loyde began to make me doubt this.
In that thread "Brian's Problem" ended up being a blown input clutch. Not very reassuring news.
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/17/2004 Heres another thought... http://www.hptuners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?board=vcmsuite_help;action=display;num =1097001747;start=0#0 We know nothing about the gears in the transmission. Maybe this trans has 3.29 gear set. Maybe it was upgraded by a previous owner. In normal mode, this thing should be just that. Only the performance mode is mod'ed. Do you have the VIN that the engine and transmission came from? Loyde |
|
Yet another thread that turned out to be a mechanical problem. The owner of the car and I both knew the transmission we had came out of a 2002 GTP and had an overall gear ratio of 2.93:1 so I knew this wasn't the problem. I forwarded some tuning suggestions that my trans builder emailed me to Loyde. The next day I got this email from Loyde:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/17/2004 Not a problem sharing the info to get this resolved.All, I can say to the enable/disable of those items is, there sure is a lot of Fieros running with it set that way, and GTPs that don’t have this problem. I just test drove the car I have here today with it both ways and saw no different in the way it shifted at all. Let me send you a PCM that I have tested on this car to be prefect with no codes today. I have one hour to prepare it… Loyde |
|
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/18/2004 Nope, redone another PCM this morning on a 1999 PCM, with 2000 code. The code is structured different in 03 in the PCM, there are chips that the HPTuner cannot access to change some things. I fear that their PCM code cannot get to the transmission stuff properly done. I used some DHP code in the PCM you are getting. Its working the customer car I have here extremely well today, this is the same PCM I tested this morning and made sure it worked with no codes. It is once again only changed in Performance mode, so put it in normal if the shifting is a little hard to you.I did not check the 3 buttons to FALSE on the torque management screen. I wanted you to feel comfortable in the changes, but I can tell you, I tested it both ways and saw no changes in the way it shifted. I just turn it off on Fieros because Fieros do not have wheel sensors to report TCS or Torque management. The input shaft has the turbine speed sensor wheel on it. Then the output shaft has the input sensor for the VSS… I am sure there’s some comparison done at this level in the PCM’s. So far, I am into $20 on shipping costs. Paypal is OpenWheel@FastFieros.com As far as the TAD, I scanned the PCM I have in the car now, and it reacted the same way on the shifts. Always -16 unless you floor it, or heavy type TPS movement. Sorry my thoughts are random and not structured well, I hate to type, and my grammar is very poor. Loyde |
|
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/19/2004 I can fix the transmission code, but it has to be done at the hex level. I don’t like to do it however because it is a lot of trial and try and test…. If I could use the same OSID on all PCM’s that would be great, but I cant. The code in the PCM you are getting Saturday is fixed my me. I can hack that code. The PCM in the car you have now, I have not hacked that OSID so I don’t know the transmission code area. I have the same problem with my 04 TAP shift transmission today. The auto mode is soft.. The manual mode however is great. So when I play, I have to be in manual mode. The 04 PCM is adaptive AI shift. It will learn your driving habits and provide very nice one gear type shifts. Its really nice, but it is not performance abuse friendly. The PCM coming to you will be firm shifting to say the least in performance mode. It is what the GTP guys like however so, I do the code for them on that. Loyde |
|
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/20/2004 I already tried to warn HPT that the transmission section was not working right. I proved it 3 weeks ago on a GTP to GTP swap that involved a 2001 complete powertrain to a 1998 car and lets just say a DHP PCM and HPT attempt to duplicate was not successful without me hacking the code at the hex level. I don’t like to do it that way because it decreases my confidence in HPT V6 support.You have to understand also that putting 99-01 code in that 12202610 PCM was not the thing to do really. I have never done for myself to test, nor for anyone else I have sent PCM for swaps. The PCM starts and runs the car for sure, but it is not acting exactly right. Loyde |
|
This is the FIRST time Loyde said he had never done this and tested it before. Glad to find out now that my swap is the guinne pig for Loyde's learning experience. Would have been nice to know before we paid the $125 for the FIRST PCM. Anyway, that aside, at this point PCM # 3 is on its way and I paid Loyde the $20 in shipping (2 PCM's) from him to us. To this point, total shipping costs me and my customer have paid is $40. Got the new PCM and installed it in the customer's car and walla, the transmission shifted like a dream. No P1811, no slipping. We were both happy...at least until: When my customer was getting ready to leave the check engine light came on and some codes were set. I quickly threw the scan tool on the vehicle and got 3 emissions related trouble codes. OBDII STUFF THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DISABLED BECAUSE OF THE FIERO SWAP. At this point both I and my customer were furious. $40 out of our pockets for shipping not to mention the time to swap out the PCMs and diagnose the problems. I wrote this email to Loyde:
quote | From: darthfiero@worldnet.att.net [mailto:darthfiero@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 9:13 PM To: FastFieros Subject: New PCM test resultsLoyde, installed the lastest PCM into the customer's vehicle today. Right off the bat I could tell the trans issue was fixed, gear shifts are crisp, and I can see the numbers moving on the scan tool more like what you were reporting. Even WOT shift points appear to be perfect. However, there are a couple of problems. I am now getting a check engine light and the following trouble codes: P0449 - EVAP Vent Valve Solenoid Control Circuit (no vent valve installed during swap) P0452 - Fuel Tank Pressure Sensor Circuit Low Voltage (no FTP sensor installed during swap) P1260 - Fuel Pump Speed Relay Control Circuit (only using 1 fuel pump relay) Also the speedo appears to be 5% too fast in calibration (reading 5% too fast in relation to actual speed). I am attaching a complete DTC code list for the 99 GTP for you to use a future reference since your HP Tuners won't tell you what each vehicle uses. Now that we got that out of the way, we need to talk. My customer is extermely frustrated that now after the 3rd custom PCM, it still isn't right. I am equally frustrated because I have now spent $20 of my own shipping money and $20 of my customer's shipping money in this PCM programming debachle. Overall, between my customer and I, we are quickly approaching the amount of money (incurred shipping on inital programming cost) it would cost me to purchase the license for the 99 GTP programming (since I have purchased DHP Powrtuner already) and do the programming myself. On top of this I have spent my own money and time driving to my customer's location and swap these PCM's out for him. I am trying to keep a cool head about this but my customer is no very happy to say the least. I am to the point that I refuse to spend any more money on shipping for PCMs. I want to know what you are going to do for us. Honestly, I feel as though we have bent over backwards and have remained flexible as long as possible but we still come back to this point: THE PCM PROGRAMMING IS NOT RIGHT. I feel personally responsible in this effort as I recommended your services to my customer based on your claims on the mailing lists and message boards concerning OBDII 3800 custom programming ability. I have been very patient and have been willing to work with you on this matter. But as I said before I have gone over my personal, and my customer's budget concerning this issue and we would like to know what you are prepared to do to make this right. My customer thinks that we should be refunded all of the shipping costs (outside of the inital shipping fee for the first custom PCM) in addition to getting another PCM that is programmed correctly for his application. I, on the other hand, understand the potential pitfalls of PCM programming and, at most, would like at least 1/2 of our shipping costs refunded with no further out-of-pocket costs for shipping to be our responsibility from here on. The pervervial ball is in your court. Please advise us on what you are planning to do for us to make this right. -ryan |
|
Loyde responded:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 11/22/2004 You better provide me a phone number since you seem to have a problem calling me…Loyde |
|
Woh... Hold up the train. I have a problem calling Loyde? First time I have heard about it. I hadn't called Loyde up until this point because we were communicating effectively thru email channels, or so I thought. Well anyway, I emailed Loyde with my finance's cell phone number because I was working on my website online and the cell phone time was free. Approx 15 min later Loyde called. Right off the bat I detected a poor attitude on the phone followed by insults about how I have an "attitude" problem with talking to people on the phone. I calmly explained to Loyde that this was the first time that he had ever told me that he PREFERRED to talk on the phone because we were having trouble communicating thru emails. Well I don't know about anyone else, but sometimes it is a lot easier for me to communicate thru emails because I save all my messages and can go back and review them in case I forget anything. Appearantly some people just don't like to do this but anyway. To sum up our phone conversation, Loyde was playing a blame game with his HP Tuners software, its short commings, and the 2002 OBDII program. I questioned Loyde WHY DID YOU NEVER TELL ME ABOUT THIS FROM THE BEGINNING IF IT WAS GOING TO BE SUCH A BIG ISSUE. Thats all he had to tell me. I would have still probably utilized his services. I also explained to him that his website does not speak of any kind of issue at all with his programming. According to one of his own emails he admits he had proven there to be a problem with his tuning software on a message forum OVER 3 WEEKS AGO! When was I going to be told about it? Now me and my customer were $40 in the hole for shipping on top of the original $125 for the programming and we don't want to pay any more money for someone's learning experience. If it was $10, not $40 shipping up until this point we would not be as upset, but $40 and on top of that Loyde still wanted ME to pay to ship the remaining PCMs back to him. Also, Loyde wanted me to explain to my customer that this is a "hybrid" swap for a Fiero and it was "unrealistic" for my customer to expect it to be perfect. Thats funny, of the 9 cars I own, 7 have engine swaps and I don't have any trans issues or false check engine lights. Why is it so hard to figure out what codes each year/make/model OBDII vehicle use and turn off the ones that pertain only to sensors and subsystems not used in a Fiero swap? I am sure Loyde has access to the same info I have which gives me this complete list of enabled DTC's per vehicle make/model/year platform. Anyway after about an hour of conversation, Loyde said he would pay for all the shipping charges here on out and send us PCM #4 with the 3 OBDII codes removed. However he admitted that he forgot to write down the numbers off PCM #3 that was in the car now so I told him I would be able to get them the following Monday after thanksgiving weekend since I was going to be out of town on a family function. After all, I don't want the cars that leave my shop to have a half-a$$ tuning job done where the check engine light is stuck on because of non-existing emissions equipment. If the check engine light comes on I want it to only be for a legitimate problem with an existing sensor or subsystem. Is that asking too much? Anyway, while I was sitting down to a thanksgiving day get-together with family, Loyde tried to pull a sneak-attack in my L67/4T65-E swap thread in the hopes of shifting blame from himself to his tuning software and me for using a 2002 PCM in the first place. However, his post did not include the WHOLE truth. He also attempted to contact my customer directly without my knowledge, appearantly to find out the PCM numbers, or so he says. At this point I don't know what I can believe any more, I thought we had things ironed out in the phone call but I was wrong. I told him I would get him the numbers he needed on Monday, he could have waited. In response to this I wrote Loyde a rather "unfavorable" email that contained much of the information I have told all of you in this post. I explained to him that the problem I have with him was not primarily about the programming, rather it was the fact that Loyde had omitted to use certain problems he was having with his software in programming OBDII PCMs. Furthermore, I explained to Loyde that I did not appreciate this whole "blame game" of his since he has been all over the internet forums and mailing lists telling everyone how good OBDII was and how he was trying to make himself out to be this OBDII tuning guru for engine swaps. I also told him that at this point I was content with keeping this whole matter quiet (publically) if he would drop the issue. Well he couldn't. In response to this email he had to call my fiance's cell phone and leave a nasty message on her voicemail. My fiance was enraged by this and posted a relpy to my build thread where she was very unhappy to get this kind of message on HER cell phone. Concequently I was out of town picking up some Fiero parts in Omaha, Nebraska all day so I wasn't here to witness what happened. Soon after my fiance posted to my thread, Loyde called her on her cell phone. He proceeded to apologize because he did not know it was her phone but then started to ask her PERSONAL QUESTIONS about OUR RELATIONSHIP. After she told him that was rude he appearantly tried changing the subject and she hung up on him. After I got back tonight from my trip, I emailed Loyde once again about his actions. I told him it was NONE OF HIS F___ING BUSINESS what my relationship was with my wife-to-be. I consider his actions to be grossly unprofessional and upsurd. I also told him in that email that he needed to cool his jets and if he just dropped the matter, I would never speak of this whole debacle publically. Well, obviously he could not resist the temptation to "save face" and had to try to pull another sneak attack in my swap thread, appearantly in an attempt to try to turn people against me for "cursing" him out in an email. Well the only cursing that happened was about his prying in me and my fiance's private lives. After I sent that email, I got this reply:
quote | recieved from FastFieros@FastFieros.com on 12/4/2004 You are the not the person in the Fiero community I thought you were. You are not here to actually help people, but to thieve on the all mighty dollar. I had great faith in your ability for hybrid installs to recommend you to people on the east coast, but I can assure you, I will never again. You are a confused person to hide behind a keyboard to cruse and feel like a big man.. I at least face my problems best I can face to face, or when distance is a issue, by phone so no misunderstanding of context is taken.Loyde |
|
If I am such a theif then why have I provided PFF with so much free information and more, detailed swap threads than most anyone else? Why do I only charge $35 to do a chip or approx $2000 labor to do a turn-key swap? Why do I provide lots of FREE technical info and wiring diagrams, again FREE OF CHARGE on my website? I am a theif who hordes money? WTF??? Let this be a warning to anyone doing business with Loyde and Fast Fieros. On his website and in his message board posts he claims himself to have vast experience and knowledge in swaps and PCM programming, but this whole debacle I have experienced has made me question some of those claims. I think he needs to change his website so it reflects the limitations of his tuning software and ability, at least until he gets it right. Again I apologize for posting such a negative topic to our PFF community forum, but I just can't tolerate these kind of actions from someone who claims to be the foremost authority on Fiero engine swaps... -ryan ------------------ power corrupts. absolute power corrupts absolutely. Custom Chip Burning | Fiero Engine Conversions | Turbocharging | www.gmtuners.com [This message has been edited by Darth Fiero (edited 12-05-2004).]
|