Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  Are Head Bolts Reusable???????

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Are Head Bolts Reusable??????? by 1988LRC
Started on: 08-22-2002 06:40 AM
Replies: 20
Last post by: Yucon Eric on 08-24-2002 01:12 AM
1988LRC
Member
Posts: 64
From: mid-missouri
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 06:40 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 1988LRCSend a Private Message to 1988LRCDirect Link to This Post
Replaced the head gasket and head bolts (used Fel-Pro) then after about 3000 miles the oil pump went out, planning on using a new short block for replacement, do I need to get a new set of head bolts or can the Fel-Pro's be reused? Thanks in advance
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 06:42 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonDirect Link to This Post
NO, buy a set from ARP. Not expensive.
IP: Logged
Dennis LaGrua
Member
Posts: 15720
From: Hillsborough, NJ U.S.A.
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 328
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 07:21 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis LaGruaSend a Private Message to Dennis LaGruaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rogergarrison:
NO, buy a set from ARP. Not expensive.

I agree. Best to replace the head bols when rebuilding. They permanently stretch when torqued. While they could be reused, you get a questionable head seal.

------------------
87GT 3.4 Turbo Best 0-60 5.2 seconds
http://turbofiero.fierojoe.com/turbo.htm

IP: Logged
1988LRC
Member
Posts: 64
From: mid-missouri
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 08:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 1988LRCSend a Private Message to 1988LRCDirect Link to This Post
thanks for the replies forgot to mention it's a 2.5 but don't guess that matters, definately don't want any questionable seals
IP: Logged
Mac
Member
Posts: 330
From: Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Registered: May 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 09:14 AM Click Here to See the Profile for MacClick Here to visit Mac's HomePageSend a Private Message to MacDirect Link to This Post

Myself, I wouldn't bother buying new head bolts.. I've rebuilt a lot of different motors from mild to wild and never used anything but the factory head bolts that I took out of the engine before the build.

I've never had any problems, but then again, maybe I've just been lucky.

Good luck!

------------------

Andrew MacPherson
86 2M6 - Stock
82 Z28 - Mod'd to the nuts
86 Firebrid - Beater

IP: Logged
TONY_C
Member
Posts: 2747
From: North Bellmore, NY 11710
Registered: May 2001


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 10:13 AM Click Here to See the Profile for TONY_CSend a Private Message to TONY_CDirect Link to This Post
I agree with Mac, unless the head bolts are specifically "torque to yield" bolts, they can be reused providing they are in good shape. Check the threads on the bolt aand chase the threads in the block with a tap and they should be fine. Remember to use sealant on those bolts that go into the water jacket.
IP: Logged
WikedV6
Member
Posts: 271
From: Elburn, IL USA
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 10:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for WikedV6Send a Private Message to WikedV6Direct Link to This Post
I thougt the factory ones are one time use, I use ARP, you can reuse them for sure.

------------------
87SE 2.8 w/5speed(waiting for a 3.8 Buick GN setup trasplant)
85SE 2.5 w/5speed (for sale)
1987 Buick GN(10.70@124MPH)
1987 Turbo T
1992 GMC Typhoon
Other cars; JaguarXJ6, AMG 500SEL,Astro & Legacy

IP: Logged
Dennis LaGrua
Member
Posts: 15720
From: Hillsborough, NJ U.S.A.
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 328
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 04:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis LaGruaSend a Private Message to Dennis LaGruaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Mac:

Myself, I wouldn't bother buying new head bolts.. I've rebuilt a lot of different motors from mild to wild and never used anything but the factory head bolts that I took out of the engine before the build.

I've never had any problems, but then again, maybe I've just been lucky.
Good luck!

The standard head bolts on most engines are reusable. The Fiero V6 ( not sure about the four) uses a "stretch" type bolt which should only be torqued once. Take a look in the Fel Pro catalog for more info.

------------------
87GT 3.4 Turbo Best 0-60 5.2 seconds
http://turbofiero.fierojoe.com/turbo.htm

IP: Logged
LS1swap
Member
Posts: 1181
From: McHenry,IL.USA
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 04:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for LS1swapClick Here to visit LS1swap's HomePageSend a Private Message to LS1swapDirect Link to This Post
I would not use them over. With a cast iron head and block you probably wouldn't have a problem, but for $20-$30 why chance it. ARP my be a little overkill for a normally aspirated engine, but are very good quality none the less. Do you really want to risk a leaking head gasket?

------------------
LS1 in and running :)
http://ls1swap.tripod.com/

IP: Logged
MrPBody
Member
Posts: 1787
From: Decatur, GA, USA
Registered: Oct 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 05:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for MrPBodyClick Here to visit MrPBody's HomePageSend a Private Message to MrPBodyDirect Link to This Post
The 2.5 4 cylinder uses "torque-to-yield" head bolts. Use once and discard. Fel-Pro sells a set for . . . uhhh, I forget . . . less than $20, I think.
IP: Logged
Mach10
Member
Posts: 7375
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 165
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 05:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Mach10Send a Private Message to Mach10Direct Link to This Post
All the Fiero bolts are Torque-to-yeild bolts... They are pretty cheap. Just replace them and be happy and safe.

My 4.9 uses reuseable bolts... At $20 ***EACH*** (20 total) I happy as a pig in shizzat

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
lateFormula
Member
Posts: 1048
From: Detroit Rock City
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 06:48 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lateFormulaSend a Private Message to lateFormulaDirect Link to This Post
Explain this to me:

How can a head bolt be torque-to-yield?

I was always taught that TTY fasteners have to be measured when torqued so that you know you've reached the correct stretch on the bolt. It's common that connecting rod bolts are TTY because you can easily measure them with a digital caliper or micrometer. Any bolt that goes into a blind hole, or into an engine block could not be TTY (from my training) becasue you cannot measure the bolt once it's installed.

IP: Logged
Mach10
Member
Posts: 7375
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 165
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 06:54 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Mach10Send a Private Message to Mach10Direct Link to This Post
As far as I understand it, they are forged to X spec, and when torqued to Y torque, they stretch to Z. This allows some flex in the motor after it warms up and stuff. How on EARTH do you measure a bolt that's in a hole already?!? X-ray vision?
IP: Logged
theogre
Member
Posts: 32520
From: USA
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 572
Rate this member

Report this Post08-22-2002 07:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for theogreClick Here to visit theogre's HomePageSend a Private Message to theogreDirect Link to This Post
However you want to define them... the L4 head bolts are TTY and are not to be used more than once. Reusing them is a good way to have one break. If it doesn't break durring install it can do it at anytime afterwards. Even if they don't snap, they may be too weak to maintain propper head seal.

Like all TTY head bolts, the L4 bolts are torqued to X FP(or NM), then rotated Y degrees. Also, not all the bolts use the same numbers. At least one is different from the rest.

------------------
11-Sept-01, The day the world as we knew it ended.

IP: Logged
StuGood
Member
Posts: 3172
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 68
Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 10:08 AM Click Here to See the Profile for StuGoodSend a Private Message to StuGoodDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Mach10:
All the Fiero bolts are Torque-to-yield bolts...
Sorry, but for the record, I really don't think so. Not for the head bolts used on the 2.8 V6, anyway. When you torque the bolts to the specified torque, they do not yield. The Duke motor may be a different story (I'm a "Duke" dunce, so I really don't know about those)?

1986 GM shop manual describes removing the 2.8's head bolts, and cleaning them for re-use. One wouldn't clean the old bolts just so that you could toss them and buy new ones !

Anyway, using new bolts certainly can't hurt, (as long as they are of the correct form and properties), so do whatever makes you feel good.

[This message has been edited by StuGood (edited 08-23-2002).]

IP: Logged
fierogsmith
Member
Posts: 1648
From: Ruskin,Florida. U.S.A.
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 68
Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 10:23 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierogsmithSend a Private Message to fierogsmithDirect Link to This Post
Hey for a lousy $20 bucks , get a set of ARP head bolts . I would not re-use head bolts , unless they were ARP . If your gonna do it , do it right the first time , less headache's and one less thing to worry about .

Galen Smith
Red 85 Sport Coupe
Founder of Suncoast Fiero Club

IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 09:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeDirect Link to This Post
For The Record

2.5 4-cyl head bolts are torque-to-yield, and cannot be re-used. You tighten them in 3 steps, using the appropriate sequence for each step. The bolt #9 in the tightening sequence (closest to the battery) has a different torque spec from the rest.

The last time I had head work done on a Duke (1986 coupe), the machine shop charged me $19.95 + tax for a set of ARP head bolts.

[edited for correction]

[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 08-24-2002).]

IP: Logged
MrPBody
Member
Posts: 1787
From: Decatur, GA, USA
Registered: Oct 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 09:30 PM Click Here to See the Profile for MrPBodyClick Here to visit MrPBody's HomePageSend a Private Message to MrPBodyDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Blacktree:
For The Record

1984-85 4-cyl:
Head bolts are not torque-to-yield


Yes and no.

The original-design head bolts were not torque-to-yield type, and some shop manuals still specify simple torque values for head bolts in these years. However, revised specifications call for use of torque-to-yield bolts in all Dukes. (per Ogre) As far as I know, all new Duke head bolts are torque-to-yield type.

IP: Logged
85frankenstein
Member
Posts: 687
From: Kenosha, WI 53142
Registered: Nov 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 11:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 85frankensteinClick Here to visit 85frankenstein's HomePageSend a Private Message to 85frankensteinDirect Link to This Post
It's less expensive in the long run to just fork up a few bucks for new head bolts. Personally, any bolt I have to torque, I replace when doing a motor. Never had a motor launch because of a failed bolt as a result. Think of it as a cheap insurance policy.

------------------
As Alice Cooper once said...

 
quote
Feed My.... Frankenstein!
IP: Logged
theogre
Member
Posts: 32520
From: USA
Registered: Mar 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 572
Rate this member

Report this Post08-23-2002 11:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for theogreClick Here to visit theogre's HomePageSend a Private Message to theogreDirect Link to This Post
DO NOT reuse 84/5 L4 head bolts! (V6, I still would not reuse the OE bolts. TTY or not.)

Read the god dam_ recall info. All the older head bolts are part of the recalls for all years except 88 L4. The exhaust side bolts are known weak and known to break even in factory installs.... The recall packs for 84-87 include the exhaust side head bolts! The worst one is the factory exhaust side bolt between cyl's 2 & 3.

For that reason alone, NEVER reuse L4 head bolts. Even if they are not part of the recall pack, 88 L4 head bolts are TTY and must not be reused.

IP: Logged
Yucon Eric
Member
Posts: 243
From: Equality,Il.,U S A
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-24-2002 01:12 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Yucon EricSend a Private Message to Yucon EricDirect Link to This Post
Sense your on the subject, what about the main bolts on the 3.4.

Yucon

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock