As some of you may know, I'm building a 60-degree V6 for my Fiero. After reading all the comments about squealing alternator belts, I decided to tackle that problem while the engine was still on the engine stand, instead of trying to kludge something together later.
I specifically wanted a belt tensioner, not just an idler pulley. But I couldn't find anyone who sells such a thing. So I built my own. I used a belt tensioner from a FWD 60-degree V6 (I forget what car), and a Dayco 46" belt. See photo below.
The tensioner I used has no built-in bracketry, just one mounting bolt and a retaining tab to keep the base from turning. That made it pretty easy to design a mounting bracket. I originally wanted to use 1/8" steel, but none of the local hardware stores had that in the necessary width. So I had to settle for 1/8 x 2" aluminum stock. I bent it into a question-mark shape, using a propane torch and a big vise. My bracket uses the same 2 mounting bolts as the lower engine mount bracket.
In the photos below, you can see the hole for the tensioner's mounting bolt, and the smaller hole for the mounting tab. Also notice how I shaved material off the side for clearance.
Thanks to the adjustablility of the alternator, and the flexibility of the tensioner, this setup should accept a wide range of belt lengths. Judging by my tests using speaker wire, this setup should accept anything from 45.5" to 47.5". I decided to play it safe with the 46" belt. Here are some shots of the tensioner and belt installed.
In that last photo, look at how close the idler pulley is to the alternator bracket. There's only about 1/16" of space! But the clearance has to be close, because the belt rides so close to the bracket. I just hope it doesn't scrape!
[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 06-07-2006).]
IP: Logged
01:39 PM
PFF
System Bot
Jun 19th, 2006
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
Now that is really cool! Never have to tighten your belt again, EVER!
I may have to do this one myself...
ooops, I misread the initial post. personally, I hate tensioners. you may not have to tighten it again, but you will be replacing it about 4x as often. I would rather have an adjustable idler than a spring. I only say that cause on my firends last envoy with a v6 and tensioner, he was replacing the belt more than 1x a year, and it was being done by the dealer under warranty. he newer one has an adjustable idler, same motor, and now 2 years old with no belt issues. beats me why they just didn;t leave it all regular V belts.
IP: Logged
10:32 PM
Formula88 Member
Posts: 53788 From: Raleigh NC Registered: Jan 2001
Does the belt tensioner actually function as a tensioner in this location? Can you move the tensioner enough to release tension on the belt to change it? It doesn't look like it would have the range of motion to actually function in this position.
Very good idea, though. I just added Rodney's idler a few weeks ago, but I do like the idea of an automatic tensioner.
IP: Logged
10:45 PM
Jun 20th, 2006
Whuffo Member
Posts: 3000 From: San Jose, CA Registered: Jul 2003
Formula88 said: Does the belt tensioner actually function as a tensioner in this location? Can you move the tensioner enough to release tension on the belt to change it?
YES to both questions. In that photo, the tensioner is actually in the middle of its range of motion.
Also, keep in mind that if I couldn't move the tensioner enough to remove the belt, I wouldn't have been able to install it in the first place! The trick is to slip it on/off the water pump pulley.
I also have a clear view of the timing marks. Check it out:
What's with all the cynicism? And what does a GMC Envoy have to do with a Fiero, anyway? Sheesh...
IP: Logged
01:09 AM
Marvin McInnis Member
Posts: 11599 From: ~ Kansas City, USA Registered: Apr 2002
It's not cynicism. Engineers do this for a living. It's always easier ... and far better ... to ask challenging questions early in the design and implementation process, before you have have thousands of units in the field that are starting to fail because some small detail was overlooked.
Congratulations on what appears to be another good solution to the Fiero V6 belt problems. The only thing I would add is that it is very important that your bracket be made carefully to ensure that the tensioner mounting surface is exactly parallel to the plane of the belt path. If the mounting surface (and thus the tensioner itself) is only slightly skewed it will wear out belts in a hurry.
I, too, would appreciate knowing what GM model (or models) use that particular tensioner.
[This message has been edited by Marvin McInnis (edited 06-20-2006).]
IP: Logged
01:30 AM
squisher86SE Member
Posts: 1350 From: Franklin, IN, USA Registered: May 2005
ooops, I misread the initial post. personally, I hate tensioners. you may not have to tighten it again, but you will be replacing it about 4x as often. I would rather have an adjustable idler than a spring. I only say that cause on my firends last envoy with a v6 and tensioner, he was replacing the belt more than 1x a year, and it was being done by the dealer under warranty. he newer one has an adjustable idler, same motor, and now 2 years old with no belt issues. beats me why they just didn;t leave it all regular V belts.
I had a 96 lumina (3.1L) with the tensioner, I only changed the belt once over the 4 years that I had it, and that was right when I bought it as preventive maintenance. You could hardly tell that it had any wear on it even when I traded it off...
[This message has been edited by squisher86SE (edited 06-20-2006).]
IP: Logged
08:32 AM
Carrolles Member
Posts: 2799 From: Alabaster, AL USA Registered: Apr 99
Originally posted by squisher86SE: I had a 96 lumina (3.1L) with the tensioner, I only changed the belt once over the 4 years that I had it, and that was right when I bought it as preventive maintenance. You could hardly tell that it had any wear on it even when I traded it off...
I agree; I never had any unusual belt wear on my Beretta over the 300,000+ miles I put on it. I eventually replaced it every so often when I was bored and looking for new projects.
On the other hand, I have Rodney's idler pulley on my Fiero, and the belt is wearing fast enough to leave a film of pulverized rubber dust on the bracket, water pump, and strut tower, after only a few hundred miles. I'm suspecting an alignment issue, however, but haven't located it yet.
IP: Logged
01:35 PM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
To OldBob and Marvin McInnis: the tensioner came from an early 1990s midsize GM (W-Body?), with a 3.1 V6. I don't remember exactly which make/model it was, though. If you want, I can take some measurements from the tensioner.
[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 06-20-2006).]
IP: Logged
02:13 PM
watts Member
Posts: 3256 From: Coaldale, AB, Canada Registered: Aug 2001
Assuming the tensioner was also a Dayco - they don't have many to pick from! (you know, in comparison to SOME parts where there's 10,000 varieties of a part)
If you can get ahold of the Dayco catalog, it has pictures, dimensions, etc. I've flipped through it looking for idlers, etc before when doing swaps. Should be pretty easy to find.
(of course, an actual part number would be great! )
Nice job and thanks for the info. I've had a bunch of cars with tensioners with no problems, so I would not worry about that. Just keep an eye on it and youll be fine.
IP: Logged
11:58 PM
PFF
System Bot
Jun 21st, 2006
Mickey_Moose Member
Posts: 7542 From: Edmonton, AB, Canada Registered: May 2001
Originally posted by tjm4fun: ooops, I misread the initial post. personally, I hate tensioners. you may not have to tighten it again, but you will be replacing it about 4x as often. I would rather have an adjustable idler than a spring. I only say that cause on my firends last envoy with a v6 and tensioner, he was replacing the belt more than 1x a year, and it was being done by the dealer under warranty. he newer one has an adjustable idler, same motor, and now 2 years old with no belt issues. beats me why they just didn;t leave it all regular V belts.
If the belt is being replaced that often because it is worn, there is an alignment issue. All my other newer vehicles that have a tensioner on them maybe get a new belt every few years - and this is mainly due to them developing cracks in them. On a side note, I rather replace the belt than the alternator because the bearing is no good from all the stress on it from trying to keep the belt tight.
Blacktree >> excellent work and thanks for hte info on the bracket and such
IP: Logged
10:48 AM
squisher86SE Member
Posts: 1350 From: Franklin, IN, USA Registered: May 2005
To OldBob and Marvin McInnis: the tensioner came from an early 1990s midsize GM (W-Body?), with a 3.1 V6. I don't remember exactly which make/model it was, though. If you want, I can take some measurements from the tensioner.
Grand Prix, Lumina (Car), Monte Carlo (through 98 or 99) for examples, probably Buick Skylark also and more I'd imagine. That tensioner looks exactly like the one out of my old Lumina. Wonder why I didn't think of it before...
IP: Logged
01:53 PM
Marvin McInnis Member
Posts: 11599 From: ~ Kansas City, USA Registered: Apr 2002
The Advance Auto Parts web site is too smart for its own good! When I clicked the link above it listed tensioner assemblies for our 1998 Dodge Caravan ... rather than for whatever car you specified.
[This message has been edited by Marvin McInnis (edited 06-21-2006).]
IP: Logged
08:25 PM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
Ah, crap. The car specified is a '91 Chevy Lumina (car) with 3.1 V6. But when I was searching through the PartsAmerica site, every early/mid 1990s GM FWD car with a 3.1 V6 that I tried kept turning up the same part numbers.
There should be LOTS of them in boneyards... which is where I got mine.
[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 06-21-2006).]
IP: Logged
11:34 PM
Jun 22nd, 2006
Fierobruiser Member
Posts: 1951 From: Gilbertsville,PA USA Registered: Aug 2001
Dayco P/N 89203 $41.48 Sure looks like it and the same as the 3.1 on my '93 Cavalier RS SW Fiero parts getter. I was just at the yard getting a fender for it. Have to go back and look at the Cavys again.
------------------ Notchbacks RULE
"Let a man drive a Fiero and he'll own one. Teach a man to fix a Fiero and he'll own eight....errr...nine."
[This message has been edited by Fierobruiser (edited 06-22-2006).]
IP: Logged
12:40 AM
Fierobruiser Member
Posts: 1951 From: Gilbertsville,PA USA Registered: Aug 2001
Blacktree, any chance of making it real easy on the rest of us. Please post, as Norm from the New Yankee Workshop would say, "a detailed measured drawrrring" of the bracket. Thanks.
IP: Logged
12:42 PM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
Ooooops...... I saw that link....hehehe. The request was for those 'old guys' out there who might have forgotten they saw it. Yeah that's what I meant ..........Thanks again. Oh...and a + for your extra trouble in reposting the link.
[This message has been edited by Fierobruiser (edited 06-22-2006).]
IP: Logged
01:13 PM
Aug 4th, 2006
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
The aluminum mounting bracket failed while I was driving the car yesterday. It cracked in half, along one of the bends. Luckily, I was able to get the car back in service by removing the tensioner and installing a stock belt.
But it's back to the drawing board for the mounting bracket. The next one will definately be beefier than 1/8" thick aluminum.
IP: Logged
02:27 PM
Bigfieroman Member
Posts: 2416 From: Pleasant Hills, PA, near Pittsburgh Registered: Nov 2000
This is the first time i've seen this thread, otherwise I would have said in June, but that bracket unfortunatly looked too thin to support the load on the tensioner. I am surprised it took so long to happen, I thought it would bend when you installed it.
You seem very mechanically inclined, I am sure you can make one that holds.
The aluminum mounting bracket failed while I was driving the car yesterday. It cracked in half, along one of the bends. Luckily, I was able to get the car back in service by removing the tensioner and installing a stock belt.
But it's back to the drawing board for the mounting bracket. The next one will definately be beefier than 1/8" thick aluminum.
Great effort, looks like your close to having a nice setup. I think I'd consider steel though instead of aluminum for the bracket for longevity. Lots of vibration.
------------------ RickN White 88GT 5spd White 85GT Auto White 99 F250SD 7.3PSD 6spd
IP: Logged
09:17 PM
Aug 5th, 2006
tjm4fun Member
Posts: 3781 From: Long Island, NY USA Registered: Feb 2006
ok, to make amends for my previous "cynacisms" (it was a ref to the belt tensioner on a v6 gm motor, that was all)
there are 2 potential solutions for this:
with your aluminum bracket, box one side of the mounting C area at the bottom, ie weld the one side closed with another piece of aluminum. heat the aluminum slightly while bending it, that is tricky to get the heat right, but aluminum likes to stress fracture at bends. since welding aluminum is not feasable for most people, most home centers sell short lengths of steel stock. I've see box and L stock of 1/8 to 3/16th thickness. you could implement your exact bracket with 3 L's and some welds, or duplicate it in straight flatstock. Again, heat the steel, red to cherry red will allow you to get a nice sharp bend and not stress the steel. Ideally you would want 3/16th flat to keep the strength up, and with flatstock, it would be easy for anyone to duplicate. the welded angles would be stronger, as the corners have a fillet on the inner corner, usually slight, but it still adds tremendous strength to the corner.
IP: Logged
05:43 AM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
I did heat the aluminum while I was bending it. But the bench vise's jaws are textured. So when I bent the aluminum, the vise left score marks on the inside of the bends. I think that was part of the problem. And It didn't help that I was using a weak material to begin with. Oh well, lesson learned.
I posted this because I don't want anyone else to have the same problem if they decide to duplicate the tensioner setup.
IP: Logged
11:14 AM
Aug 7th, 2006
Formula Owner Member
Posts: 1053 From: Madison, AL Registered: May 2001
Nope. The tensioner bolts to the timing chain cover on those cars. The FWD V6 uses a different timing chain cover, which also serves as a mounting point for the alternator... which is mounted in a different location from the Fiero. The alternator would interfere with the Fiero's dogbone. Plus, the FWD V6 uses a different water pump... which would require some custom plumbing.
I'd rather make a bracket.
IP: Logged
01:55 PM
ka4nkf Member
Posts: 3702 From: New Port Richey, FL USA Registered: May 99
Why not use steel for the bracket. Cut a couple small pieces of 1/8 steel, drill where it needs to be, and weld the joints together. That should be much beefier than any aluminum of the same thickness.
Actually when I saw the pictures of the aluminum bracket I was already fearing a failure, since I've used aluminum like that for other lighter duty things. I read later down the thread that it failed. Sorry about the failure. If it were me I would just use steel. If you don't have a welder take it to a shop and tell them how to weld it together, be right there standing next to them. It shouldn't be very expensive. I used to do that before I bought my Mig welder.
Good luck. ------------------ Carlos A. Martinez 1988 Formula 5-speed, ZZ4 V8 www.txfieros.com
[This message has been edited by TxFieros (edited 08-08-2006).]