THANK YOU for being another person who took on the challenge of building up a duke despite the heavy "Want horsepower, drop in a v8, its the ONLY way" mentality.
Yea, there is a lot of that attitude going on around here. Perhaps some people are just afraid of change.
H+M Performance sells remanufactured 3.0 cranks for $178. Not sure what the core is though. They also list a #499311 crank for $60 which is reported to be good for 7600 RPM. The 311 is 3" stroke the 3.0 is 3.6".
I have figured out a way to do all my parts for my build up cheap, with the exception of the head. I am trying to find out which factory casting flows the best, I do not want to do major surgery to get good numbers and the stock flow is weak for what I want to do. Any ideas or leads?
Erik-
IP: Logged
04:32 AM
Mar 8th, 2003
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
I have figured out a way to do all my parts for my build up cheap, with the exception of the head. I am trying to find out which factory casting flows the best, I do not want to do major surgery to get good numbers and the stock flow is weak for what I want to do. Any ideas or leads?
This question has probably already been asked, but, is there a bearing cap girdle for the Duke that would strengthen the lower block of an otherwise stock engine?
Would this help or is the crank itself the problem?
Is there a stronger crank which will work with the stock pistons and rods?
I am looking at the (remote) possibility that I would build a reliable Duke in the 120 to 150hp range so I am now gathering as much new information as I can. My website contains all of the information I have gathered so far so take a look and let me know what I have missed.
BTW sounds like an awesome engine project, been a great read.
Ira
------------------ Ira Crummey 1984 econo coupe (soon to depart) 1985 coupe (work in progress) The Iron Duke Resource Site
[This message has been edited by Monza76 (edited 03-08-2003).]
I just had a good laugh, I just found out that a mercruiser 3.0 Wont fit into a Fiero, unless you get an Archie kit. It's an Iron duke with A SBC bolt pattern. Its also missing the side water inlet that you would need for a Fiero. So much for that idea. However, I may purchase a 3.0 crank very soon, it shows promise.
------------------
"How do I get one of those Smileys that rolls back and forth accross the screen?" -Archie
IP: Logged
01:42 AM
Mar 18th, 2003
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
I checked with H&M Performance about availability, price and core deposit on the Mercruiser crank. The crank cost $178.00 and has a $60.00 core charge, for a total of $238.00. Here is the problem, and I am not sure which crank to get. One stock number has two piece bearings and the has one piece bearings. Which one would you use? I think I have heard of one piece bearings, butI am not sure how they work or what they look like. Anybody got any ideas? Jim
------------------ 87 Gold GT down for upgrades 86 Red coupe ana duke 5 speed running now daily driver 84 IRM Turbo Duke, Loaded with goodies 84 Silver SE Parts
I checked with H&M Performance about availability, price and core deposit on the Mercruiser crank. The crank cost $178.00 and has a $60.00 core charge, for a total of $238.00. Here is the problem, and I am not sure which crank to get. One stock number has two piece bearings and the has one piece bearings. Which one would you use? I think I have heard of one piece bearings, butI am not sure how they work or what they look like. Anybody got any ideas? Jim
maybe they are talking about 1 or 2 piece rear main seal. if so, i would use 1 piece seal. they leak less. if they are really talking about 1 piece bearings, i would like to know how they get them on the crank??? just my 2 cents worth..........charley j
Any new news on this car, the weather is warm and I figure it should be out tearing up the streets!
one thing after another. when i lowered the car, i didn't take into consideration that the rear struts would be to long. they bottom out when i go over any bumps. koni said $200 each to shorten them. car is sitting till i can convince the war dept. (wife) thar i really need that money. driving me crazy to see the car sitting, but have to feed the kids first.
Ya I would love to see some pic's! I hate to say it but the v8 guys do show alot of pictures...
didn't take many pics of the build up on car. kinda built it over time, and without any real intentions of building it. bought it 7 years ago, and didn't do anything except drive it for 4 years. didn't even know if it had an air filter in it. then i lowered it 2 inches, and the rest is history. will round up what pics i do have and get them posted. am working on converting a 93 up camaro p[ower rack into the car. will take plenty of photos of that job...................charley j
How about a recap of the engine build, I know you have outlined everything here but this has become a very big thread, a condensed version would be very helpful to those of us who would like to try something similar (if not quite so ambitious). I would like a stronger Duke, but I am not pushing as far as you have. I don't mean to have you go over everything, just the high lights of what worked such as:
- what block? - what crank? - did crank or block require machine work? - what connecting rods and pistons? - what head or head modifications? - what head gasket? - what cam? - what fuel system and modifications ?(injectors, etc.) - any problem with flywheel or clutch? - what oil pump?
You can fill in any gaps I may have missed.
I am so glad to see that there are still a few people out there who feel that a four cylinder Fiero is still a valid alternative. It seems that , too often, the engine swap guys put down anyone who suggests building a better Duke. Usually there responses mean well, the cost of doing a 2.5 right is very high, but often they forget the complexity and cost involved in a swap as well. I would like about 120hp, more would be better but I am realistic about what I can accomplish with my funds and abilities. The Duke is compact and logically laid out so that it is so much easier to work on then most of the alternatives as well.
Some more quick questions: Has anyone actually used the Mercruiser 3.0L crank and can comment on what machine work was required and what pistons and rods to use for near stock compression ratio?
What about the 2.5 used in the late 1970s RWD Sunbird (non-crossflow head), does it have a better crank and if so will it fit the later block?
Sorry but I cannot control my curiosity. And I am Still curious.
Ira
IP: Logged
10:46 AM
jlhuber Member
Posts: 881 From: Hope, MI, USA Registered: Oct 1999
Originally posted by Monza76:Has anyone actually used the Mercruiser 3.0L crank and can comment on what machine work was required and what pistons and rods to use for near stock compression ratio?
I dunno about yall, but if I am gonna go through the trouble of swapping in a different crank, it is not gonna end up with stock compression. I am thinking 13:1 ...unless its turboed
quote
Originally posted by Monza76:What about the 2.5 used in the late 1970s RWD Sunbird...
'70s Sunbird? Can't recall ever seeing one of those. Could I get some more info from you, or anyone else.
------------------ --Jess-- AIM/YIM: asyferme
If you expect the unexpected, was it really even UNexpected in the first place?
'85 SE, 2.5, 5spd (350 standing by waiting for ole duke to puke) '86 SE, 2.8, auto (pushrod 3.4 swap on hold)
'02 Yamaha R6, blue/white, 3600 miles, LIGHT case of roadrash, for sale. Will accept Fiero(s) and/or parts as PARTIAL trade.
Around 1976 Pontiac was given a version of the Chevy Monza with the 2.5L Iron Duke. The engine was a response to the Vega engine which had a habit of self destructing. The Sunbird name lasted until the model was dropped for the new FWD J2000 but after a couple of years they dusted off the name and stuck it on the FWD. I owned a Chevy Monza Towne coupe (their spelling) but I liked the style of the Pontiac. The 2.5 in those cars did not have the crossflow head (carb and exhaust were on the same side) but the basic engine block was there, with a little mors internal structure (probably similar to the S10 engine). It did not make very much horsepower, typical of the late 70s, definitely less than 90, possibly less than 80 (remember 305 V8s from that era had only about 120hp, 350s ranged from 150 to 200).
this is the only pic I could find, a 1980 coupe. Ira
- stock block 1985 - Mercruiser crank (3.0L) (older type) - Aftermarket rods and pistons (carefully figure out the correct numbers to end up with about 10:1 CR) - Quality rebuild parts (bearings gaskets etc.) - Improved cam, but nothing too radical. - Machine head for BBC rocker studs and use roller rockers for BBC - Mild port job on stock head (gasket match intake and exhaust, open up intake ports slightly remove some of the swirl vane material) - Holley Throttle body with mildly modified stock intake. - Stock electronics - Free flowing exhaust
Did I miss anything?
What sort of power and reliability should this provide?
[This message has been edited by Monza76 (edited 05-25-2003).]
IP: Logged
08:31 AM
PFF
System Bot
Jun 6th, 2003
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
3.250 stroke crank from 63-70 nova 153. have to have an adapter from 1 piece to 2 piece rear main seal. had to machine about 3/4" off back of crank and drill a new flywhel bolt pattern in what was left. custom aluminum flywheel was then made to match the crank. crower 6" sportsman rods. .030" over silvolite hypereutectic pistons. nothing fancy about pistons. stock configuration for fiero worked well. if you want less conpression, you need custom pistons. arp studs for the main journals and the head. schneider racing custom ground cam. cam specs: lift-.493" int, .465" exh. duration-260 deg gross, 202 deg @ .050" lift. lobe seperation-110. kinda mild cause the car has to pass smog. good port and polish in cyl head. i used a 87-92 s-10 head with 642 casting number. all the race car machinests said this is the head that breathes the best. had to make a little adapter for the intake manifold to fit. stock size stainless valves. titanium keepers and locks. 454 screw in studs (7/16"). had to machine the head for these to fit. also had to have the guide plates laser cut. crower 1.8 stainless roller rockers for intake, and 1.7 for the exhaust. custom length crower hardened pushrods. 454 injector in my stock tbi unit. changed the stock header type manifold to a 180 degree cast iron manifold with a custom built 2 into 1 header pipe. 21 psi fuel pressure is what it finally took to get it to stop running extreme lean. made my own fuel pressure regulator, and used a stock type v-6 fiero fuel pump.
- stock block 1985 - Mercruiser crank (3.0L) (older type) - Aftermarket rods and pistons (carefully figure out the correct numbers to end up with about 10:1 CR) - Quality rebuild parts (bearings gaskets etc.) - Improved cam, but nothing too radical. - Machine head for BBC rocker studs and use roller rockers for BBC - Mild port job on stock head (gasket match intake and exhaust, open up intake ports slightly remove some of the swirl vane material) - Holley Throttle body with mildly modified stock intake. - Stock electronics - Free flowing exhaust
Did I miss anything?
What sort of power and reliability should this provide?
[This message has been edited by Monza76 (edited 05-25-2003).]
This combo looks good but I would make some "subtle" changes...
Use a modified intake to accept "other" throttle bodies, drill and weld in bosses to accept port injectors (aimed directly into the port), then flow bench it to slightly exceed max desired RPMs. To run it, use an after market ECM. Kudos on the thread. My opinion is that power can be made from any starting point and doesn't necessarily require the big $$. (Use the Porsche GT1 as a reference to avoid big $$/HP) So getting a 3X improvement from a stock engine is quite an accomplishement and you should get props for it. Technician did the same thing a while back and caught flack (as well as praise) for his efforts. Most importantly is that you enjoy yourself and have fun with it. G/L
P.S. O-ring the heads next time you take it down. That way when you add the NO2, you won't have any problems.
P.S. Anyone collecting stats on things such ... longest running thread?
[This message has been edited by 87GTZ34 (edited 06-06-2003).]
IP: Logged
07:15 PM
Jul 6th, 2003
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
machine work on intake does not work. has a monster vacuum leak. am now gathering parts to put 87-8 intake and tbi on it. all ports line up, but fuel lines and throttle cable are different. will get it done shortly. already made adjustable fuel pressure regulator for 87 style t.b.i.
Did you try the port injection conversion? If so that's too bad that it didn't work out. I wouldn't give up on it yet, but I would do what you're doing to make the car driveable. What other TB did you try and what computer did you use? Thanks for the update and continued G/L!
IP: Logged
04:20 PM
Kento Member
Posts: 4218 From: Beautifull Winston Salem NC Registered: Jun 2003
Originally posted by Monza76: I am so glad to see that there are still a few people out there who feel that a four cylinder Fiero is still a valid alternative.
Ira
Ira, What about Clifford Products, their slogan is 4/6=8
------------------ 86 "PoSE" Needs every thing but 4 NEW Tires!!! They ride better when new, not like after they sit for 3 years! http://home.cfl.rr.com/fierose
[This message has been edited by Kento (edited 07-07-2003).]
IP: Logged
05:40 PM
Jul 11th, 2003
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
Did you try the port injection conversion? If so that's too bad that it didn't work out. I wouldn't give up on it yet, but I would do what you're doing to make the car driveable. What other TB did you try and what computer did you use? Thanks for the update and continued G/L!
port injection is not an option. car has to pass calif smog. 87-8 is legal swap, so on in that direction..............
you know that the 84-86 intake manifolds are different from the 87-88 manifolds, but for 84-86 you can put a holley tbi and is bigger and passes california regulations and it delivers 30% more airflow than stock, if you go to www.fierostore.com you will find it there but you are looking at about $300, its good replacement for stock. -Roy
IP: Logged
03:05 PM
mrossum Member
Posts: 804 From: lake havasu city, az Registered: Oct 2000
you know that the 84-86 intake manifolds are different from the 87-88 manifolds, but for 84-86 you can put a holley tbi and is bigger and passes california regulations and it delivers 30% more airflow than stock, if you go to www.fierostore.com you will find it there but you are looking at about $300, its good replacement for stock. -Roy
i have a seriously ported head on this monster. the ports have been moved to match the intake pattern on the 87 up type gm 2.5 head.
air flow is not the issue, here. fuel quantity is where the problems are arising.
have the 87 intake on car now. am still wresling with wiring for the tbi, iac and tps. should have it wired shortly. still don't have the struts shortened yet. wife and daughters talked me into building a life size play house in back yard. has taken all extra money and time. will get back to monster before long.
Why is everybody using the 3.0L Mercruiser crank? Is it just because it gives a larger stroke? I would like to build my 2.5L up, but I have a limited budget, so I dont want to do much expensive machining, I was looking at a casting #311 crank, which I have heard is a direct replacement. But is is heavier, and stronger than the stock crank. Also, what is a good compression ratio to aim for? 10:1? I want to use 350 pistons in this motor.
------------------
IP: Logged
02:58 PM
Fiero5 Member
Posts: 8882 From: Arecibo, PR Registered: Jun 2000
mrossum, we are all behind you bro and waiting anxiously to hear some good news on your quest to successfully build a big bad iron duke
I would love to be able to tear Jordans Green beasts iron duke down and really pump it up some:
His engine looks sweet and amazingly has a lot of power for a lowly 4 banger but still..... Please keep us updated, and maybe pics at some point of part of the build up would be great.