Thinking about making a custom lower intake to bolt on a l67 m90 supercharger..what do you guys think? Would the power increase be worth the effort..i think it would be something cool and unique..
It is doable tho it takes more effort than you polly want to put into it a kid in rhe past did a3100 beretta z26 you'll have to do something wwith the decklid the charger will sit.too high the injectors will need moubted differently . As for the snout you will either need a different snout or have to puchase a zzp ssm90 pulley for it to line up with the stock setup. I mean its definitly a cool idea just ALOT of work needed
IP: Logged
11:06 AM
Khw Member
Posts: 11139 From: South Weber, UT. U.S.A. Registered: Jun 2008
Thinking about making a custom lower intake to bolt on a l67 m90 supercharger..what do you guys think? Would the power increase be worth the effort..i think it would be something cool and unique..
3400, like the 3.4 pushrod similar to the 2.8 or the DOHC? Sorry, that gets confusing sometimes as people say one when they mean the other. If it's the 3.4 pushrod, sounds intersting, I know someone did something kinda like that but mounted the supercharger off to the side of the engine.
I think the one area you may have trouble with is that the M90 was used on a 90o V6 and the 3.4 or DOHC are 60o. That might create some difficulty with overall height being to much to fit under the decklid and would explain why they mounted it off to the side in the above pic. Of course it might be possible to add a decklid scoop to give more clearance for it so long as the pully end didn't interfere with the decklid support structure.
[This message has been edited by Khw (edited 05-18-2012).]
IP: Logged
11:07 AM
GADJet Member
Posts: 1466 From: Star City, AR, USA Registered: Sep 2010
I think the one area you may have trouble with is that the M90 was used on a 90o V6 and the 3.4 or DOHC are 60o. That might create some difficulty with overall height being to much to fit under the decklid and would explain why they mounted it off to the side in the above pic. Of course it might be possible to add a decklid scoop to give more clearance for it so long as the pully end didn't interfere with the decklid support structure.
Is there a build thread on this? Thats really interesting.
Is there a build thread on this? Thats really interesting.
I would not get too excited about this side mount install. Its right over the exhaust manifold where loads of heat will be present. Heat in the intake is not benefical but I guess an intercooler could be added. I would reccommend a turbo instead....., lower cost, easier to install, and more horsepower potential.
------------------ " THE BLACK PARALYZER" -87GT 3800SC Series III engine, custom ZZP /Frozen Boost Intercooler setup, 3.4" Pulley, Powerlog manifold, Northstar TB, LS1 MAF, 3" Flotech Afterburner Exhaust, Autolite 104's, MSD wires, Custom CAI, 4T65eHD w. custom axles, HP Tuners VCM Suite. "THE COLUSSUS" 87GT - ALL OUT 3.4L Turbocharged engine, Garrett Hybrid Turbo, MSD ign., modified TH125H " ON THE LOOSE WITHOUT THE JUICE "
IP: Logged
11:45 AM
Pete Matos Member
Posts: 2291 From: Port St. Lucie, Florida Registered: Jan 2010
Even so ,by the time you are finished dicking around with the pipe fabrication, pulley mounting and bracketry for the side mount setup and not getting results, the turbo would have proven to be cheaper AND more effective. That supercharger was designed to be mounted over the engine on a water cooled intake manifold, not right over a 600* hot exhaust manifold.
------------------ " THE BLACK PARALYZER" -87GT 3800SC Series III engine, custom ZZP /Frozen Boost Intercooler setup, 3.4" Pulley, Powerlog manifold, Northstar TB, LS1 MAF, 3" Flotech Afterburner Exhaust, Autolite 104's, MSD wires, Custom CAI, 4T65eHD w. custom axles, HP Tuners VCM Suite. "THE COLUSSUS" 87GT - ALL OUT 3.4L Turbocharged engine, Garrett Hybrid Turbo, MSD ign., modified TH125H " ON THE LOOSE WITHOUT THE JUICE "
IP: Logged
07:10 PM
86 toy Member
Posts: 674 From: Mifflinville,PA Registered: Jan 2011
Even so ,by the time you are finished dicking around with the pipe fabrication, pulley mounting and bracketry for the side mount setup and not getting results, the turbo would have proven to be cheaper AND more effective. That supercharger was designed to be mounted over the engine on a water cooled intake manifold, not right over a 600* hot exhaust manifold.
I don't plan on remote mounting it. As stated in my first post I plan to Fab a lower intake manifold to mount it on