Lol, let's see who has what sigs, and who has the best
Here's mine!!!
------------------ Petty Officer Michael C Casaceli Patrol Squadron Ten, United States Navy 1988 Pontiac Fiero 2.5L, soon to be 2.2L ECOTEC TURBO (THE PROJECT HAS STARTED!!!) 1988 Oldsmobile Firenza 2.0L non-turbo (R.I.P.my beloved J-body. K.I.A. by a Ford) 1994 Chevy S-10 4.3, it's finally here, and it is gorgeous!
IP: Logged
05:51 AM
PFF
System Bot
jelly2m8 Member
Posts: 6244 From: Nova Scotia, Canada Registered: Jul 2001
------------------ Zero C's 86 Gt Fastback "This car is so good looking its almost indecent. - AutoWeek on the new 1986 GT" Mods Include :Crx Cold Air Intake, Pontiacsound Box, Mustang Hood Scoop Zeros Home Page MSN Messanger tylercaddick@hotmail.com
IP: Logged
09:00 AM
avengador1 Member
Posts: 35468 From: Orlando, Florida Registered: Oct 2001
posted by Cliff Pennock (01-01-2001 through 01-01-2005) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've noticed that some signatures are a bit beyond what they are meant for. If you are using images in your signature, please keep in mind that not everybody has a broadband connection. Some threads load very slow simply because the browser needs to load a couple of hundred K's of signatures. So try to keep them below 30K max.
Also, some signature images are way too large. If your signature image is higher than 4 lines of text, chances are it's annoying the heck out of people. Repetition - i.e. displaying your signature with every response in the same thread - is also not preferable.
If you want to include a link to your website in your signature, try doing this with a text link. I've seen animated banners in some people's signature. One of the nice things about this forum is that it has no banners. Please keep it this way. Most people find banners annoying and I'm already receiving complaints from members about the banners in signatures.
IP: Logged
02:51 PM
naskie18 Member
Posts: 6258 From: Commerce Twp, MI, USA Registered: Jun 2002
But it still requires people to wait for a 114K+ sig to load in a page, regardless of who's bandwidth its chewing up. Me, I don't care, I've got cable at home and DSL here in my house at school. But for those people still on dialup, thats a long arse time to wait, especially for a sig thats 150x113 pixels. You can create much larger graphics that take up a whole lot less space.
Nick
IP: Logged
03:35 PM
Fiero5 Member
Posts: 8882 From: Arecibo, PR Registered: Jun 2000
1987 Fiero SE, Tech IV, Auto.
