Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T - Archive
  Post your favorite aircraft here. (Page 2)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 
Previous Page | Next Page
Post your favorite aircraft here. by The_Stickman2
Started on: 12-31-2007 08:28 PM
Replies: 98
Last post by: fieroturbo on 01-06-2008 01:06 AM
The_Stickman2
Member
Posts: 1030
From: Lehigh Valley Pa.
Registered: Sep 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 03:37 AM Click Here to See the Profile for The_Stickman2Click Here to visit The_Stickman2's HomePageSend a Private Message to The_Stickman2Direct Link to This Post
Here is some cool aircraft art I found. BTW I finally own a page.



This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.

[This message has been edited by The_Stickman2 (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
fierofetish
Member
Posts: 19173
From: Northeast Spain
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 277
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 04:54 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierofetishSend a Private Message to fierofetishDirect Link to This Post
Hey!! So what!! I was RAISED on Biggles books!!

And my other fav has already been aired above..the Spitty!! and the Hurricane.
From the days when Men were Men, and sheep in France were afraid!!!
Hahahah!!
Nick
IP: Logged
Mike Marden
Member
Posts: 432
From: Fernandina Beach, FL
Registered: Aug 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 09:32 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Mike MardenSend a Private Message to Mike MardenDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jarhead 2m4:

For me, it has to be the KC-130 built by Lockheed Martin.

This special aircraft has a certain personality that I truly adore. It can do anything from aerial refueling to troop/cargo transport, aerial delivery, and battlefield illumination. The US has been flying this aircraft for over 50 years, and with the brand new "J" model, will probably continue to use it for many more. Watch the video starting at 4:19 where it's wheels first touch the ground. It comes to a complete stop, offloads 2 vehicles, reverses back down the runway and takes off with the wheels being on the ground for less than a minute.





My third-oldest nephew, John Skinner, was a pilot on Fat Albert '91 through '93 www.blueangels.org/Marines/1991/MYEAR91.html . Loved the rocket-assisted take-off they do at the shows

My fav has always been the Lightning P-38.

------------------
The only problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard

86 SE 2.8 4-Speed

[This message has been edited by Mike Marden (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
SCCAFiero
Member
Posts: 1144
From: Boca Raton, Fl USA
Registered: Apr 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 09:41 AM Click Here to See the Profile for SCCAFieroSend a Private Message to SCCAFieroDirect Link to This Post
Super constellation.
IP: Logged
intlcutlass
Member
Posts: 1431
From: Cleveland,Oh.44067
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 12:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for intlcutlassSend a Private Message to intlcutlassDirect Link to This Post
Rotodyne- Why the USA has spent billions on the v-22 when this thing has been around sine the 60's...????



Spruce Goose

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.


Gazelle Attack helo



X-29

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 12:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by intlcutlass:
Spruce Goose

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.


Howard Hughes HATED the name "Spruce Goose."
That was what his detractors called it to make fun of him. It's sad that the photo even makes reference to it.
IP: Logged
intlcutlass
Member
Posts: 1431
From: Cleveland,Oh.44067
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 12:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for intlcutlassSend a Private Message to intlcutlassDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:


Howard Hughes HATED the name "Spruce Goose."
That was what his detractors called it to make fun of him. It's sad that the photo even makes reference to it.


I remember that..... but nobody whould know what I ment if I refered to it as the HK1.....

IP: Logged
84Bill
Member
Posts: 21085
From:
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 461
User Banned

Report this Post01-02-2008 12:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84BillClick Here to visit 84Bill's HomePageSend a Private Message to 84BillDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by The_Stickman2:



Hustler... nice.
IP: Logged
tutnkmn
Member
Posts: 3426
From: York, England, U.K. Living in Ohio
Registered: May 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 01:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for tutnkmnSend a Private Message to tutnkmnDirect Link to This Post
Here's my pig-bird. The FB-111A Aardvark:



I was a structural maintenance tech on these at Pease AFB. Actually I think the plane above is an "F" model F-111 not an FB-111A. It's hard to find good photos of the FB version.
IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29569
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 01:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
Sr-71 & A-10 - ya ya! gooood stuff
F-22 is a favorite too

also a big fan of the WW1 & WW2 prop jobs.

if it flys - it makes me happy
IP: Logged
The_Stickman2
Member
Posts: 1030
From: Lehigh Valley Pa.
Registered: Sep 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 01:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for The_Stickman2Click Here to visit The_Stickman2's HomePageSend a Private Message to The_Stickman2Direct Link to This Post
intlcutlass---It is a cool aircraft. Here's a vid I have in my favorites on Youtube. Also an odd story. I was looking thru a DOD website and found a Document onthe German JU-287. Now for those that do not know about the JU-287 it was a 4 engine Jet bomber during WWII. It had flown and was being readied for production. Now if the fact that the germans already had a 4 engine jet bomber in service(all be a small one) and were adding another isn't odd enough considering we didn't have a jet bomber till like the mid 50's. The JU-287 had forward swept wings like the X-29. Now consider how long it took us to make an experimental forward swept wing aircraft and the Germans were prepared to use one as a production bomber. Shows how far ahead of use they really were. NOW back to the ODD part. This document was only declassified in 1995?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so553pu66kg

84Bill---Thanx. I always loved the Convair planes. And who wouldn't like a mach 2+ delta wing bomber. And one as sexy as the Hustler. I have a few more of those are pictures. If anyone wants to see them or wants the link let me know as there are more on the site.

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Toddster
Member
Posts: 20871
From: Roswell, Georgia
Registered: May 2001


Feedback score:    (41)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 504
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 02:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ToddsterSend a Private Message to ToddsterDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by The_Stickman2:


Hey that's Yippee. The 5000th Lightning made, i believe. It was painted bright reed or orange if I remember.


Yep, the Nazi's had a nickname for the P-38, "Der Gabelschwanz Teufel, "the forked-tail devil"
IP: Logged
TennT
Member
Posts: 1523
From: Humboldt, Tenn
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 03:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TennTSend a Private Message to TennTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by intlcutlass:

Rotodyne- Why the USA has spent billions on the v-22 when this thing has been around sine the 60's...????





Looks like it'd be more complex than the V-22. Still bet you'd have trouble with the rotary wing into
high headwinds (if that'd be the best way to put it)
Top speed of 191 mph
Neat Idea but must have been noisy or hard to maintain.
good You Tube here:
http://www.helis.com/50s/h_rotdyn.php

The Scissor wing jet was always interesting, but it seems that Messershmitt had an idea before NASA
http://www.fiddlersgreen.ne...tt-P1109/me-1109.php

Best Flight I ever had: Vari-EZE, buzzing the ground at close to 200 mph, then swooping
across the countryside like a fighter pilot.
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32294
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 229
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 04:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
Airspeed is limited on Rotary Winged aircraft due to difference in lift generated by the forward moving blades versus the aft headed blades. The aircraft can only go so fast, the forward moving blades produce more lift than the rearward moving blades. In modern helicopters, the swash plate in the hub compensates for the difference in lift generated by the rotor system quadrants. At some point, depending on the blade design and the hub system, the rearward blades can't compensate after a certain point. At that point, the helicopter will attempt to do aerobatic maneuvers without the pilots input.

------------------
Ron

It's the Soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us the freedom of the press.
It's the Soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us the freedom of speech.
It's the Soldier, not the politicians
That ensures our right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
It's the Soldier who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag.

IP: Logged
buddycraigg
Member
Posts: 13606
From: kansas city, mo
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 478
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 04:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for buddycraiggSend a Private Message to buddycraiggDirect Link to This Post
since i live in KC, i'm biased.
i love 37charlie
"Star of America" for those at home.
IP: Logged
intlcutlass
Member
Posts: 1431
From: Cleveland,Oh.44067
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 04:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for intlcutlassSend a Private Message to intlcutlassDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Airspeed is limited on Rotary Winged aircraft due to difference in lift generated by the forward moving blades versus the aft headed blades. The aircraft can only go so fast, the forward moving blades produce more lift than the rearward moving blades. In modern helicopters, the swash plate in the hub compensates for the difference in lift generated by the rotor system quadrants. At some point, depending on the blade design and the hub system, the rearward blades can't compensate after a certain point. At that point, the helicopter will attempt to do aerobatic maneuvers without the pilots input.




Keeping it simple:

The Military wanted a craft that could take off like a helo, and have roughly the speed of an airplane. They wanted it to be armed (The Osprey is not armed with the nosecannon they wanted), and have the capability to carry x number of troops. This could have been one of those cases of form follows function. They have spent an obscene amount on the osprey , when IMHO, they could have invensted a fraction of the amount in the concept behind the rotodyne & upgraded the engines to speed it along. The theoretical max speed was thought to be 250 mph... but a hybrid craft like this one could potentially go a bit more than that.

The Sikorsky S-69 hit 322 mph
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 32294
From: Covington, TN, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 229
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 05:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsDirect Link to This Post
If you think the Osprey was expensive, fielding a few hundred of these would be like buying F 22s, well maybe not quite as much but very expensive A/C. The Advancing Blade Concept IMO was worth further research but apparently funding was not available at least to military channels. There is a lot of politicing that goes on for a limited budget and every Politician wants those dollars spent in their own district or state.

It's also important to remember that the XH-59 or S69 as some call it was "experimental" and never proven to be reliable. Personally, I'd still be flying if the Osprey had been an Army A/C. I seriously considered moving over the the Marines but, sea duty wasn't something that I was interested in.

Sikorsky S-69 / XH-59
1972

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In February 1972, Sikorsky announced the development of an experimental helicopter designated S-69, which was designed to study the Advancing Blade Concept (ABC). This new system consisted of two rigid, contra-rotating rotors which made use of the aerodynamic lift of the advancing blades. At high speeds, the retreating blades were offloaded, as most of the load was supported by the advancing blades of both rotors and the penalty due to stall of the retreating blade was thus eliminated. This system did not even require a wing to be fitted for high speeds and to improve manoeuvrability, and also eliminated the need for an anti-torque rotor at the tail.

The aim of the project was to evaluate the ABC with this helicopter, first using scale models for wind tunnel tests at the Ames NASA research center, and then the real aircraft, which flew on 26 July 1973. Unfortunately, however, this prototype was lost in an accident a month later. Following an enquiry, design modifications were requested, plus improvements to the control system. Tests were resumed in July 1975 with a second aircraft. When test flights as a pure helicopter were completed, a new experimental phase began with the addition of an auxiliary turbojet. In 1983 Sikorsky proposed further modifying the aircraft as the XH-59B, with a shortened fuselage and ducted fan providing forward thrust.

G.Apostolo "The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Helicopters", 1984

In late 1971 the Army Air Mobility Research and Development Laboratory awarded Sikorsky a contract for the development of a single-engined research helicopter prototype designed specifically to flight test the company's Advancing Blade Concept (ABC) rotor system. The resultant Model S-69, which was allotted the military designation XH-59A and the serial number 71-1472, made its first flight in July 1973.

The XH-59A's ABC system consisted of two three-bladed, coaxial, contra-rotating rigid rotors, both of which were driven by the craft's single 1825shp PT6T-3 Turbo Twin Pac engine. During high-speed flight only the advancing blades of each rotor generated lift; this off-loaded the retreating blades and thereby eliminated the aerodynamic restrictions caused by blade-stall and the high mach number effect of the advancing blade tip. This, in turn, produced greater stability and manoeuvrability while eliminating the need for either a supplementary lift-generating wing or an anti-torque tail rotor. The XH-59A's streamlined fuselage more closely resembled that of a conventional airplane than a helicopter, having a cantilever tail unit with twin endplate rudders, side-by-side seating for the two crewmen, and fully retractable tricycle landing gear.

The crash of the first XH-59A early in the flight test programme led to the construction of a second prototype incorporating several significant control system modifications. This second machine (73-21941) flew for the first time in 1975, and in 1977 was converted into a compound rotorcraft through the installation of two 1350kg J60-P-3A turbojet engines. The modified machine was jointly evaluated by the Army, Navy, and NASA beginning in 1978, and was later able to reach and maintain speeds in excess of 515kph in level flight. The first prototype was ultimately rebuilt as a compound rotorcraft under a NASA contract and subsequently test flown (with the new serial 73-29142) by mixed Army, Navy, and NASA crews at NASA's Moffet Field, California, test facility. Both XH-59A aircraft were officially transferred to NASA following the 1981 end of joint Army/Navy participation in the tri-partite flight test programme.

***************************************************************************************************************************************************
XH-59A Advancing Blade Concept (ABC) / S-69
NASA and DOD developed several rotary-wing-based aircraft that used powered lift technology. These included the XH-59A, advancing blade concept aircraft during the 1970s, the JVX or tilt-rotor aircraft, and the RSRA/X-wing aircraft. These aircraft had the common ability to take off and land vertically like a helicopter, but in flight, they used a variety of technologies to operate as conventional fixed-wing aircraft.

One way to eliminate the problem of stalling and reverse rotor blade flow that limits the forward speed of a helicopter is to use two counterrotating rotors. The Advancing Blade is that half of the rotor disc in which the rotation of the blade is moving in the same direction as the movement of the helicopter. If the helicopter is moving forward, the advancing blade will be the right half of the rotor disc; if moving backward, it will be in the left half; if moving sideward to the left, it will be in the forward half; and if moving sideward to the right, it will be in the rear half. Rotor blades flap to equalize lift between the advancing blade half and retreating blade half of the rotor disc. Dissymmetry is created by forward movement of the helicopter. When the helicopter is moving forward, the speed of the advancing blade is the sum of the indicated airspeed of the helicopter plus the rotational speed of the blade.

The Advancing Blade Concept (ABC) uses two rigid counterrotating rotors in a coaxial arrangement to provide advancing blades on both sides of the aircraft. This makes use of the high dynamic pressure on the advancing side of the rotors at high forward speed, virtually ignoring the low dynamic pressure on the retreating side, while still keeping the rotor system in roll trim. Theoretically, such a rotor system will maintain its lift potential as speed increases. The XH-59A was designed to investigate this theory.

This is the principle behind the XH-59A, built by Sikorsky Aircraft [S-69] in a jointly funded Army, NASA, and now, Navy program. The XH-59A program started in 1971; by 1973, two XH-59As were ready for flight-testing.

The XH-59A Advancing Blade Concept demonstrator wa powered by the P&W-Canada PT6T-3 Turbo Twin-Pac and two P&W J60 turbojets. It had two stacked, contrarotating 36' rotors. As a pure helicopter, it achieved 184 mph level flight speed, 221 mph in a dive; with auxiliary propulsion, it achieved 274mph (>322mph) in level flight. However, one aircraft was lost during a hard landing.

Flight-testing of the XH-59A as a pure rotary-wing craft had been completed by 1977. The XH-59A’s extreme agility and maneuverability were even more than had been expected. This maneuverability comes about because of the very stiff rotor blades used on the XH-59A, making the ABC an ideal candidate for a combat aircraft. The stiffer blades are also more rugged and thus more likely to survive encounters with tree limbs and hits from small arms fire.

In 1978, the high-speed test program was started with the addition of two auxiliary 3000-pound thrust jet engines mounted on the fuselage. The YH-59A had two additional P&W J60-P-3As, and two aircraft were built. The first flew on 26 July 1973, but crashed on 24 August 1973. The second aircraft flew on 21 July 1975, and in March 1977 the two J60s were installed for forward flight.

The XH-59B with PT6T-3 and shrouded fan was proposed, but never built. It was to be converted with two T700-GE-700s, contrarotating rotors, and a tail-mounted pusher prop. This project, which was designated XH-59B, was not proceeded with.

Advancing Blade Concept was a contender for the RAH-66, but the transmission weight penalties were too high and so the trade study decided that the advantages were outweighed by the weight disadvantage.
------------------
Ron

It's the Soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us the freedom of the press.
It's the Soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us the freedom of speech.
It's the Soldier, not the politicians
That ensures our right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
It's the Soldier who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag.

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
cowan1984
Member
Posts: 244
From: Spooner, WI
Registered: Nov 2007


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 05:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cowan1984Click Here to visit cowan1984's HomePageSend a Private Message to cowan1984Direct Link to This Post
Here's my two favorites:

Embraer ERJ-145


CRJ 700


A little different than the warbirds most are posting here, but I am going to be going to school to fly these for a living Hopefully then I can afford to work on my Fiero!

------------------
'84 Engine Swap Under Construction
Visit Project Website!
http://cowan1984.xtreemhost.com/

IP: Logged
FierociousGT
Member
Posts: 2307
From:
Registered: Jan 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 131
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 06:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FierociousGTSend a Private Message to FierociousGTDirect Link to This Post
I always liked this jet after playing the AcroJet game on my Commodore 64 and seeing it in the James Bond movie Ocotpussy. It's affordable too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bede_BD-5





EDIT:
Found crash
http://forum.keypublishing....owthread.php?t=70679

[This message has been edited by FierociousGT (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
Gokart Mozart
Member
Posts: 12143
From: Metro Detroit
Registered: Mar 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 159
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 07:07 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Gokart MozartClick Here to visit Gokart Mozart's HomePageSend a Private Message to Gokart MozartDirect Link to This Post
I met Corky Fornoff, the stunt pilot who flew thru the hanger, in 2002. He was a down to earth guy. (Was one of the best charter's I drove. Met several greats in the motorsports arena.)

[This message has been edited by Gokart Mozart (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
htexans1
Member
Posts: 9114
From: Clear Lake City/Houston TX
Registered: Sep 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 118
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 07:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for htexans1Send a Private Message to htexans1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by buddycraigg:

since i live in KC, i'm biased.
i love 37charlie
"Star of America" for those at home.


Hey!! Theres one of those abandoned at Salina Municipal Airport, also known as Shilling AFB KS.

------------------
1988 Fiero Formula T-tops
CJB 143 of 1252 "factory T-top cars"

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
FierociousGT
Member
Posts: 2307
From:
Registered: Jan 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 131
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 08:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FierociousGTSend a Private Message to FierociousGTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Gokart Mozart:
I met Corky Fornoff, the stunt pilot who flew thru the hanger, in 2002. He was a down to earth guy. (Was one of the best charter's I drove. Met several greats in the motorsports arena.)


I found this site with his pic.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org...n/planes/q0256.shtml



According to this site it also appeared in Die Another Day.
IP: Logged
Gokart Mozart
Member
Posts: 12143
From: Metro Detroit
Registered: Mar 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 159
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 08:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Gokart MozartClick Here to visit Gokart Mozart's HomePageSend a Private Message to Gokart MozartDirect Link to This Post
I think it was hanging from the ceiling in the Underground where Bond met M and she reinstated his 00 status. Q was walking around with him and Bond was fiddling with the old gear.
IP: Logged
FierociousGT
Member
Posts: 2307
From:
Registered: Jan 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 131
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 08:54 PM Click Here to See the Profile for FierociousGTSend a Private Message to FierociousGTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Gokart Mozart:
I think it was hanging from the ceiling in the Underground where Bond met M and she reinstated his 00 status. Q was walking around with him and Bond was fiddling with the old gear.


I think you would be able too. The empty weight of just 358 lb (162 kg). The US Military is using this jet for something....

[This message has been edited by FierociousGT (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
buddycraigg
Member
Posts: 13606
From: kansas city, mo
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 478
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 09:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for buddycraiggSend a Private Message to buddycraiggDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by htexans1:
Hey!! Theres one of those abandoned at Salina Municipal Airport, also known as Shilling AFB KS.


as far as i know 37C is the last one that is flying. and she hasn't flown much in the last two years due to engine problems.
IP: Logged
84Bill
Member
Posts: 21085
From:
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 461
User Banned

Report this Post01-02-2008 10:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84BillClick Here to visit 84Bill's HomePageSend a Private Message to 84BillDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by htexans1:


Hey!! Theres one of those abandoned at Salina Municipal Airport, also known as Shilling AFB KS.



I seriously doubt a connie would be abandoned. More like the problem of restoration is aging properly
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2008 10:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post


Hughes XF-11

"The aircraft was designed to meet the same requirements as the Republic XF-12; specifications called for a fast, long ranging photo-reconnaissance aircraft. Said to be a scaled-up version of the earlier Hughes D-2, the final design was similar in general appearance to the famous Lockheed P-38 Lightning [1]. It was a tricycle-gear, twin-engine, twin-boom all-metal monoplane with a pressurized central crew nacelle, with a much larger span and much higher aspect ratio than the P-38's wing.

The XF-11 used Pratt & Whitney R-4360-31 28-cylinder radial engines with twin four-bladed, controllable-pitch propellers at the front of each engine. The propeller design was very unusual in that the front and rear propellers on each engine were counter-rotating, which can increase a propeller-driven aircraft's performance and stability, but which can also add much mechanical complexity.

The Army originally ordered 100 of them for the purposes of photo reconnaissance. The order was cancelled following the end of World War II, leaving Hughes with two prototypes."

General characteristics

* Crew: two, pilot and navigator/photographer
* Length: 65 ft 5 in (19.94 m)
* Wingspan: 101 ft 4 in (30.89 m)
* Height: 23 ft 2 in (7.06 m)
* Wing area: 983 ft² (91.3 m²)
* Empty weight: 37,100 lb (16,800 kg)
* Max takeoff weight: 58,300 lb (26,400 kg)
* Powerplant: 2× Pratt & Whitney R-4360-31 radial , 3,000 hp (2,240 kW) each

Performance

* Maximum speed: 450 mph (720 km/h)
* Range: 5,000 miles (8,000 km)
* Service ceiling: 44,000 ft (13,415 m)


Mainly just because I did contra rotating props.

[This message has been edited by Formula88 (edited 01-02-2008).]

IP: Logged
TennT
Member
Posts: 1523
From: Humboldt, Tenn
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 01:54 AM Click Here to See the Profile for TennTSend a Private Message to TennTDirect Link to This Post
Didn't Howard have trouble with the pitch control and crash one in LA, killing someone
on the ground?
IP: Logged
TennT
Member
Posts: 1523
From: Humboldt, Tenn
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 02:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for TennTSend a Private Message to TennTDirect Link to This Post

TennT

1523 posts
Member since Nov 2002
Evidently he did, scrapping the twin prop idea. Plane was unstable at low speeds and the
order was cancelled. U2 is still flying! Can you believe it?
Blackbird retired and U2 still working (very updated cameras, I'm told).
IP: Logged
fieroturbo
Member
Posts: 1085
From: Orefield, PA
Registered: Jan 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 02:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fieroturboSend a Private Message to fieroturboDirect Link to This Post
You can't top the F-14:



What other plane could go mach 2, simultaneously target up to 26 aircraft, simultaneously fire at 6 aircraft at 100 miles away, and still keep tracking other targets? None!



As much as I love F-14's, they're gone now, so I submit the P-3C Orion... the planes I work on:






And also, the P-3 community has done something that most fighter jets have never done: We took out a Chinese fighter jet in-flight!

------------------
Petty Officer Michael C Casaceli
Aircraft Electronics Technician Second Class
AIMD Brunswick (2007-present)
Patrol Squadron Ten (2003-2007)
United States Navy

[This message has been edited by fieroturbo (edited 01-03-2008).]

IP: Logged
Fieromaniac
Member
Posts: 980
From: Hamburg, Germany
Registered: Nov 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 05:33 AM Click Here to See the Profile for FieromaniacClick Here to visit Fieromaniac's HomePageSend a Private Message to FieromaniacDirect Link to This Post
russian ekranoplane aka kaspian seemonster




------------------
1984 Fiero Sport
1987 Fiero <- Ethanol powered Batmobile
1984 Fiero SE
1999 Chrysler Grand Voyager 3.3 LX <-LPG powered family car

*** nuclear winter cures global warming ***

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Jarhead 2m4
Member
Posts: 1849
From: Missouri City, TX
Registered: Jun 2006


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 06:22 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Jarhead 2m4Click Here to visit Jarhead 2m4's HomePageSend a Private Message to Jarhead 2m4Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fieroturbo:

And also, the P-3 community has done something that most fighter jets have never done: We took out a Chinese fighter jet in-flight!


Yes, but the crew also made an emergency landing in China and taken prisoner. One of my former instructors was on that flight. Oh, and get this, the Chinese pilot's name: Wong Wei!

BTW: the engines on the P3's are mounted upside-down!

------------------
"Semper Fiero"

IP: Logged
htexans1
Member
Posts: 9114
From: Clear Lake City/Houston TX
Registered: Sep 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 118
Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 06:32 AM Click Here to See the Profile for htexans1Send a Private Message to htexans1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fieroturbo:

And also, the P-3 community has done something that most fighter jets have never done: We took out a Chinese fighter jet in-flight!


My ex-wife was in VP(s) 10, 46 and 9 when she (was) on active duty. She used to claim the superiority of the P-3 on its missions.

Being an AF member I told her it (the P3) wasn't even a real Navy airplane, as it didn't have a launch bar or a tail hook.

She didn't seem to get the humor to well LOL!!

------------------
1988 Fiero Formula T-tops
CJB 143 of 1252 "factory T-top cars"

[This message has been edited by htexans1 (edited 01-03-2008).]

IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 08:11 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonDirect Link to This Post
For some reason, I was thinking the B58 was from North American Aviation, not Convair.....

[This message has been edited by rogergarrison (edited 01-03-2008).]

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 08:59 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by TennT:

Didn't Howard have trouble with the pitch control and crash one in LA, killing someone
on the ground?


Yeah. He crashed the first prototype when the pitch control on one of the props failed and it reversed pitch throwing the plane into an extreme yaw rate. I don't remember if anyone died in the crash, but it nearly killed Hughes.
IP: Logged
The_Stickman2
Member
Posts: 1030
From: Lehigh Valley Pa.
Registered: Sep 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 09:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for The_Stickman2Click Here to visit The_Stickman2's HomePageSend a Private Message to The_Stickman2Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fieromaniac:

russian ekranoplane aka kaspian seemonster






I do love this plane. The Caspian Sea Monster is as cool as you get. And look at the size of it. This was the first video I posted in this thread. BTW They still exist. You can see them on Google earth. I thought these would make a great yacht.

------------------
My sites
http://the-stickman.tripod.com

http://www.youtube.com/TheStickman

IP: Logged
The_Stickman2
Member
Posts: 1030
From: Lehigh Valley Pa.
Registered: Sep 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 09:54 AM Click Here to See the Profile for The_Stickman2Click Here to visit The_Stickman2's HomePageSend a Private Message to The_Stickman2Direct Link to This Post

The_Stickman2

1030 posts
Member since Sep 2007
 
quote
Originally posted by rogergarrison:

For some reason, I was thinking the B58 was from North American Aviation, not Convair.....



Nope. Convair went from making the behemouth B36 to the X92, F102, F106, F2Y Sea Dart, And B58. All Delta's after the B-36. I love them all, well except for the B36 as it was chosen over Northrops Flying wings.
IP: Logged
swisscheese
Member
Posts: 537
From: somewhere over the pond
Registered: Oct 2005


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 09:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for swisscheeseClick Here to visit swisscheese's HomePageSend a Private Message to swisscheeseDirect Link to This Post
another vote to the blackbird!

but that kaspian seemonster is somewhat interesting
IP: Logged
Butter
Member
Posts: 3979
From: TN
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 91
Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 11:14 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ButterSend a Private Message to ButterDirect Link to This Post
I used to work the ECM on these birds--
http://www.museumofaviation.../bombers/04-b52d.htm

IP: Logged
TennT
Member
Posts: 1523
From: Humboldt, Tenn
Registered: Nov 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-03-2008 03:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TennTSend a Private Message to TennTDirect Link to This Post
anyone notice how many designs and how much work was done in aerodynamics
before the mid 60s or so? Most modern work seems to be revolving around
trying to get old ideas to work using modern technology.
Or am I not observant enough (in this area)?
tg
IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 


All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock