Like dredging up age old connotations to suggest it happens today ?
It was Black History celebrations. A celebration of the past. Not a celebration of today. Black people, having been mostly in the southern part of the country in their past history, certainly must have eaten a lot of cornbread, seeing as how it was a southern staple. Sometimes they probably added some crackling's to the bread. They probably drank a lot of buttermilk and ate chitlins, too.
Chicken has long been a popular food with the black community. It provided good nourishment, was easy and fast to produce, and served multiple purposes around the living quarters. It consumed a huge amount of insect, it was a garbage disposal for table scraps, it provided eggs for the breakfast table and for cooking other dishes, and provided the flock was populous enough, it also provided a very tasty main course on the dinner table.
The origin of watermelon is Africa. David Livingston discovered it during his missionary work, growing wild in large numbers in central Africa. It was revered by the natives as food and also was good source of water during times of drought. So, yes, Black History has a strong tie to watermelon, too.
Those food items are also tied to the white populace of the south. Having black servants as cooks, wouldn't you think that those dishes made it to the Massuh's dining table? I know that in my youth, all were common fare on both sides of my family tree. Still are, today, but with a little less frequency.
If I were invited to dine with a northerner or Canadian and they served cornbread, buttermilk, fried chicken, turnip salad, corn on the cob and watermelon, I'd be asking them to adopt me instead of being offended.
IP: Logged
11:24 AM
cliffw Member
Posts: 37544 From: Bandera, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2003
Originally posted by fierofool: It was Black History celebrations. A celebration of the past. Not a celebration of today. Black people, having been mostly in the southern part of the country in their past history, certainly must have eaten a lot of cornbread, seeing as how it was a southern staple. Sometimes they probably added some crackling's to the bread. They probably drank a lot of buttermilk and ate chitlins, too.
Chicken has long been a popular food with the black community. It provided good nourishment, was easy and fast to produce, and served multiple purposes around the living quarters. It consumed a huge amount of insect, it was a garbage disposal for table scraps, it provided eggs for the breakfast table and for cooking other dishes, and provided the flock was populous enough, it also provided a very tasty main course on the dinner table.
I guess during hispanic history month (, what ? There is none ?) if they suggested serving beans, rice, and tortillas, it would be considered racist.
[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 02-10-2014).]
IP: Logged
11:56 AM
Purple86GT Member
Posts: 1592 From: Ontario, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
There was a time when chicken was only eaten by the well to do. It at the time was one of the most expensive foods you could shove in your cake hole, far exceeding steaks or lobster.
So, no, a slice of watermelon isn't racist in and of itself. But when people talk about black people loving watermelon, they're talking about a lot more than food. They're talking about a stereotype with a lot of racist history — history still embraced by some of the worst people on the internet. History is important — any Black History Month celebration that ignores the experiences and portrayals of black people in this country is shallow at best. If you want to acknowledge black history this month, learn it.
There was a time when chicken was only eaten by the well to do. It at the time was one of the most expensive foods you could shove in your cake hole, far exceeding steaks or lobster.
quote
Why is fried chicken racist? Via Authentic History.
Fried chicken isn't racist. Eating fried chicken isn't racist. A lot of people like fried chicken, and some happen to be black. In 2010, a black chef at NBC served fried chicken and collard greens in honor of Black History Month. QuestLove was not impressed, and stirred up a Twitter storm when he tweeted the picture. “I don’t understand at all. It’s not trying to offend anybody and it’s not trying to suggest that that’s all that African-Americans eat. It’s just a good meal,” the chef, Leslie Calhoun, told The Grio, adding, “I thought it would go over well.” It did not.
The problem stems from the way fried chicken is associated with black people, and the historical baggage that comes with it. The same way blackface recalls minstrel shows, the "black people love fried chicken" image recalls negative portrayals of black people. According to Claire Schmidt at the University of Missouri, it started with Birth of a Nation, the 1915 film on the founding of Ku Klux Klan. In one scene:
[A] group of actors portraying shiftless black elected officials acting rowdy and crudely in a legislative hall. (The message to the audience: These are the dangers of letting blacks vote.) Some of the legislators are shown drinking. Others had their feet kicked up on their desks. And one of them was very ostentatiously eating fried chicken.
"That image really solidified the way white people thought of black people and fried chicken," Schmidt said.
And in case you're tempted to think that sort of portrayal is a thing of the past, like minstrel shows, think back to what professional golfer Sergio Garcia said to his nemesis, Tiger Woods, when asked if he'd ever invite Woods to dinner. "We'll have him 'round every night," Garcia said. "We will serve fried chicken." Woods was not amused. When Republican Colorado State Sen. Vicki Marble associated diabetes and mortality rates with barbecue and chicken, even the Colorado GOP had to take a step back.
Hey, it's not my experience but I can't lay blame on those who might get upset by the connotation. I'm unsure why it's hard to understand that a people who were persecuted might not like the notion and think it was a bad idea. Again it's why I think an idiot (black or white) thought this lunch choice would be a good idea to represent Black History Month.
Though interesting, not sure what that has to with my post, and or why you quoted me like it was a reply.
I think the entire thing is ridiculous. People spend too much time looking for reasons to be offended, and even if it is/was/will be, so what. I think weak people are thin skinned, the rest of us just move on.
IP: Logged
06:34 PM
cliffw Member
Posts: 37544 From: Bandera, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2003
Originally posted by newf: ... it's why I think an idiot (black or white) thought this lunch choice would be a good idea to represent Black History Month.
What the hell has lunch got to do with Black history month anyway? If you want to talk food and Blacks in America then talk about George Washington Carver. He did more with peanuts and sweet potatoes than anyone. Serve that on a lunch plate.
IP: Logged
06:51 PM
fierofool Member
Posts: 12955 From: Auburn, Georgia USA Registered: Jan 2002
I guess during hispanic history month (, what ? There is none ?) if they suggested serving beans, rice, and tortillas, it would be considered racist.
I'm sure that some would be waving the banner of racism. Nothing I wrote should be considered as portraying the black race as sterotypical. I was simply pointing out that those food items were a major part of the history of black peoples in the US and are still. They had nothing to do with suppression or slavery, nor does the burrito, beans, rice or enchiladas of the Mexican community.
Meals of today often are of a variety that we relate to certain celebrations. Christmas ham, Thanksgiving turkey, Independence Day burgers and dogs. My wife and I have the traditional New Years Day meal of Collard Greens and Black Eye Peas, both seaoned with hog jawl and Cornbread.
I guess I would wonder what they expected to be served.
[This message has been edited by fierofool (edited 02-10-2014).]
IP: Logged
07:29 PM
lurker Member
Posts: 12355 From: salisbury nc usa Registered: Feb 2002
gen. robt. e. lee was very fond of cornbread and fried chicken. i've never seen him mention watermelon, but i suspect he ate it. thing is, corn bread, fried chicken and watermelon are very commonly eaten by the people of the southern US, many of whom happen to be of recent (since 1492) african descent. although often not on a footing of social or legal equality, diet was, and still is, determined more by economics than by race. so cornbread, fried chicken and watermelon are southern american poor or middle class people's food, just like okra, scrapple and poke, rather than belonging to a particular race. the stereotype may have developed because of the connection of watermelon to africa and the high probability of poverty among aforementioned people of african descent, and been spread outside the south by the black diaspora, in which freed slaves went north looking for work during and after reconstruction, taking their cuisine with them. (cue jim crow laws discusion in 3, 2, 1...)
yes, there's that ugly stereotype, but so what? what are we supposed to eat during black history month? pizza? chicken chow mein? (neither of which are italian or chinese, strictly speaking)
IP: Logged
07:44 PM
Feb 11th, 2014
FieroTony Member
Posts: 1175 From: Conowingo, MD Registered: Feb 2012
I think the entire thing is ridiculous. People spend too much time looking for reasons to be offended, and even if it is/was/will be, so what. I think weak people are thin skinned, the rest of us just move on.
EXACTLY! Look hard enough, you'll find it.
IP: Logged
05:49 AM
cliffw Member
Posts: 37544 From: Bandera, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2003
Originally posted by fierofool: Nothing I wrote should be considered as portraying the black race as sterotypical. I was simply pointing out that those food items were a major part of the history of black peoples in the US and are still. They had nothing to do with suppression or slavery, nor does the burrito, beans, rice or enchiladas of the Mexican community.
I did not think you portrayed any thing, except the facts.
IP: Logged
07:50 AM
firstfiero Member
Posts: 4879 From: york,pa,17403 Registered: Dec 2000
I Always thought it was funny when I was a kid that the same family members that made fun of black people for fried chicken and watermelon would tear it up when they were served at a cook out lol people have been trained by society to get so butt hurt at the slightest thing.
I Always thought it was funny when I was a kid that the same family members that made fun of black people for fried chicken and watermelon would tear it up when they were served at a cook out lol people have been trained by society to get so butt hurt at the slightest thing.
So I guess it's an obvious and know negative stereotype if you had people in your family that make fun of black people for it?
I agree there are way bigger things to get upset about than some idiots idea for a lunch but then again who am I to judge what others are offended by? Personally I think that the fact that the school apologized etc. is enough.
[This message has been edited by newf (edited 02-11-2014).]
IP: Logged
09:23 AM
Feb 13th, 2014
cliffw Member
Posts: 37544 From: Bandera, Texas, USA Registered: Jun 2003
I have no idea what your first paragraph means. I was a kid more then 30 years a go when I would hear relatives make jokes about it. I didn't say it wasn't a stereo type. I said I thought it was funny because the same people making racist jokes about black people loving chicken also loved chicken. So to me (a child) it seemed funny in a way that didn't make sense. Are you with me now ? In case your unaware I've heard black people make fun of me for the stuff white people do and eat. We have a good laugh and move on.
quote
Originally posted by newf:
So I guess it's an obvious and know negative stereotype if you had people in your family that make fun of black people for it?
I agree there are way bigger things to get upset about than some idiots idea for a lunch but then again who am I to judge what others are offended by? Personally I think that the fact that the school apologized etc. is enough.