This is why Progressives and Conservatives will never get along.
How is this, NOT a crime? This is CLEARLY exploitation of minors. This is in no way, shape or form encouraging unity and acceptance of a life style......
A generation ago, these photographs—the transgendered or cross-dressing figure holding up the children's story book in the library among the children, and that other scene unfolding in a park-like setting outdoors—could not have been imagined.
And yet, that generation had children that are today's LGBTQQIP2SAAs. (Readers may want to look up the translation of that acronym.)
So I don't know. I'm not seeing what's in these photographs as (necessarily) any kind of LGBTQQIP2SAA indoctrination or grooming. I don't know if the scenes in these photographs should be alarming. Are children being shaped to develop alternative gender identities because they are learning in these previously unprecedented ways about the existence of alternative gender identities?
Maybe what was previously unknown or not experienced in any direct way by children was more consequential than having it brought out in the open like this.
I look forward to the pending and future research reports in the specialist's journals, and the media reports about the research reports, written for reading or viewing by the larger non-specialist population that I am part of.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-11-2022).]
A generation ago, these photographs—the transgendered or cross-dressing figure holding up the children's story book in the library among the children, and that other scene unfolding in a park-like setting outdoors—could not have been imagined.
And yet, that generation had children that are today's LGBTQQIP2SAAs. (Readers may want to look up the translation of that acronym.)
So I don't know. I'm not seeing what's in these photographs as (necessarily) any kind of LGBTQQIP2SAA indoctrination or grooming. I don't know if the scenes in these photographs should be alarming. Are children being shaped to develop alternative gender identities because they are learning in these previously unprecedented ways about the existence of alternative gender identities?
Maybe what was previously unknown or not experienced in any direct way by children was more consequential than having it brought out in the open like this.
I look forward to the pending and future research reports in the specialist's journals, and the media reports about the research reports, written for reading or viewing by the larger non-specialist population that I am part of.
I think we found the guy who writes Kamala Harris's speeches.
Julia 🇺🇸 @Jules31415 · 1h The entire J6 narrative has been debunked this week courtesy of the FBI and J6 Unselect Committee. Amazing! 🙌🏻😂
Julia 🇺🇸 @Jules31415 · Jul 11 Reporter Jim Hoft: "Today we have the truth, today we have a whistleblower who stepped forward. This whistleblower released documents from the Kansas City Proud Boys; they were infiltrated on J6."
Per TGP, the infiltrator was working with the FBI: "His name is James Knowles."
[This message has been edited by Hudini (edited 07-12-2022).]
Julia 🇺🇸 @Jules31415 · 1h The entire J6 narrative has been debunked this week courtesy of the FBI and J6 Unselect Committee. Amazing! 🙌🏻😂
Julia 🇺🇸 @Jules31415 · Jul 11 Reporter Jim Hoft: "Today we have the truth, today we have a whistleblower who stepped forward. This whistleblower released documents from the Kansas City Proud Boys; they were infiltrated on J6."
Per TGP, the infiltrator was working with the FBI: "His name is James Knowles."
I'm looking forward to seeing and hearing more about this in 2023, if the majority in the House goes back to the Republicans, which I believe is not unlikely. I'm looking forward to the Republican-led House Select Committee to investigate the Democratic Party-led House Select Committee's investigation of January 6.
I'm looking forward to any actions by lawyers who have been representing (or will now be engaged by) the defendants among the Kansas City Proud Boys, who have been indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice over what happened at the Capitol Building on January 6.
Even if there is some truth to these messages, about an FBI infiltration of the Kansas City Proud Boys, where would it go from there? There could be an effort to use this in the defense of some of the Kansas City Proud Boys in their federal cases. But what more? Would it be a thread that is pulled to unravel more of this rather long and broad case against the former President? Or would it just be an unravelling of a small part of a much larger indictment (metaphorically, if not literally) of the former President?
I'll "watch this space."
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-12-2022).]
I'm looking forward to seeing and hearing more about this in 2023, if the majority in the House goes back to the Republicans, which I believe is not unlikely. I'm looking forward to the Republican-led House Select Committee to investigate the Democratic Party-led House Select Committee's investigation of January 6.
I'm looking forward to any actions by lawyers who have been representing (or will now be engaged by) the defendants among the Kansas City Proud Boys, who have been indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice over what happened at the Capitol Building on January 6.
Even if there is some truth to these messages, about an FBI infiltration of the Kansas City Proud Boys, where would it go from there? There could be an effort to use this in the defense of some of the Kansas City Proud Boys in their federal cases. But what more? Would it be a thread that is pulled to unravel more of this rather long and broad case against the former President? Or would it just be an unravelling of a small part of a much larger indictment (metaphorically, if not literally) of the former President?
I'll "watch this space."
Patience is a virtue.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-12-2022).]
Some drag-queens / transvestites want to be around children, I assume, because many of them may be into deviant behavior, and that involves "shock" fetishes, which include things that are taboo. In effect, they are probably partially living out their fantasies in doing so.
Parents want their kids to be around children... I should say, white liberal parents, because they're ignorant and want to feel like they're being accepting and ... DEI.
A book like this, could very well be read by the assistant librarian, or a Mr. Rogers-type figure. Why does it need to be read by a drag queen? What is the benefit here. Do drag-queens have a better grasp of the English vernacular such that the stories are better?
It's literally state and parent-funded perversion.
There are many trans people who want to live a normal life, and don't have fetishes like this. But the ignorant left seem unable to differentiate between someone who simply wants to be the opposite sex, with someone who's dressed like a sex worker.
I wonder if the kids just see them as weird, gross clowns. I thought all clowns were weird and gross, I never liked them. But the whole concept of drag queens and kids is repulsive and disturbing. I don't understand it.
I don't think it should be outlawed, we have too many laws already, but I am very disappointed that parents allow it. I suppose that it is another symptom of "It takes a village". Parents are being squeezed out of their job, their responsibility. It is the same thing that allows mass murderers.
A generation ago, these photographs—the transgendered or cross-dressing figure holding up the children's story book in the library among the children, and that other scene unfolding in a park-like setting outdoors—could not have been imagined.
So I don't know. I'm not seeing what's in these photographs as (necessarily) any kind of LGBTQQIP2SAA indoctrination or grooming.
Originally posted by 2.5: Read what you said again....
So I am Quoted, but parts of what I said are omitted.
It's an "arresting" image, of the costumed character with the massively oversized codpiece, but it's so theatric that it doesn't seem obviously sinister to me. The two girls who are "appreciating" the codpiece look old enough to know (or old enough that they should know) something about male genitalia. Like the very first or most rudimentary elements of classroom sexual education.
Is that the mother of the two very young girls standing next to them? What's on her mind when this photo was taken?
I refer the "court" to the entirety of my earlier remark, not the very abridged version of it that was just posted by 2.5.
