Parents want their kids to be around children... I should say, white liberal parents, because they're ignorant and want to feel like they're being accepting and ... DEI.
So I am Quoted, but parts of what I said are omitted.
I refer the "court" to the entirety of my earlier remark, not the very abridged version of it that was just posted by 2.5.
Indoctrination happens and has been happening. What you say isnt , is. THAT is my point. Your in between words change nothing. I was just trying to make it simple for readers. Hopefully now that I exaplaned it as well, it is understandable.
Originally posted by 2.5: Seems it is time rinselberg change the subject again.
Change the subject? Really? In so far as relevance to subject, my previous remark is "right down central." It's "spot on"... "center cut"... "teeing it up."
If my previous remark were a pitch (as in baseball) any proficient batsman would be trying to barrel it up... to "smoke it"... to strike it soundly with the bat and elevate it, hoping to find an outfield gap or even "leave the building."
My previous remark is so perfectly aligned with the subject that it is like an extra base hit waiting to happen.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-20-2022).]
My attention is drawn to the woman in the center of the photograph that looks like she might be the mother of the two girls that are inspecting the codpiece.
What's on her mind? What are her thoughts?
Forum member Hudini posted this photograph, but without sourcing it. I tried to find it online. I think it's from a Twitter conversation in some European language, but not English. But I couldn't actually find the photograph itself.
Could there be some direct personal relationship between this woman and the man individual who is costumed with the "super-sized" codpiece? Was she acquainted with him this individual before that moment? I think it could be a "gay pride" kind of event or gathering, but are we even be certain of that? Did this happen in the U.S. or in some other country?
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-21-2022).]
Originally posted by rinselberg: My attention is drawn to the woman in the center of the photograph that looks like she might be the mother of the two girls that are inspecting the codpiece.
Those words may be offensive to this person probably. And I'm sure this person and younger persons wouldn't appreciate your racial profiling, Sherlock.
quote
What's on her mind? What are her thoughts?
Again! What are you, some reich-wing gun toting Walmart shopping deplorable?
quote
Forum member Hudini posted this photograph, but without sourcing it. I tried to find it online. I think it's from a Twitter conversation in some European language, but not English. But I couldn't actually find the photograph itself.
Could there be some direct personal relationship between this woman and the man individual who is costumed with the "super-sized" codpiece? Was she acquainted with him this individual before that moment? I think it could be a "gay pride" kind of event or gathering, but are we even be certain of that? Did this happen in the U.S. or in some other country.
There have been a number of pics posted of crap like this here in the past few months to bring attention to societies progress thanks to the UNPOPULAR/NON-MAJORITY supporting mainstream liberalism. Some 100% taken in this country. None of which you've commented on nor researched where the images originated, why this one? Is purple your favourite color? Are you currently singing to yourself: "It was a one-eyed, one-horned, flyin' purple people eater"
Could it be the costumes' tail, folded forward (opposite of what famed nominated NCAA swimmer "woman" of the year Lia Thomas has to do to hide his junk) while the individual tells the youngsters rainbows will come out the other end if -handled- correctly?
I don't know what to make of your reference to "racial profiling". Where's the racial profiling in anything that I've said? I said a "European language, but not English." But I don't see how that goes to "racial" or "racial profiling."
I've reacted to the photograph only as a consequence of Hudini having posted it earlier in this thread.
The person in the photograph that most draws my attention is the woman (a young women, it's fair to say) in the center of the photograph.
I have no context for the photograph. It looks to me like it's a "pride" event or gathering in a public or neighborhood park. The women in the center of the photograph is the mother or guardian of the two young girls, pre-teens, who are interacting with the garishly or lewdly (it's fair to say) costumed individual with what I'm calling the "super-sized codpiece."
The woman brought the two girls to the park. Likely, she knew there was a "pride" event at the park, and is very possibly, an active and premeditated participant herself, in the event, although I think it is also not beyond imagination that the woman and the two girls went to the park just for the sake of being outdoors in pleasant weather and happened upon this event by chance.
I am focused on this woman, because I think her presence and role is critical to the two very young girls and how they are processing this moment.
What do I see in the future for these young girls? I would be cautious about reading predictive significance into this photograph. Are these girls especially likely to develop into LGBTQQIP2SAAs teenagers and adults, instead of "straight" or conventionally heterosexual women? Are the two girls, or perhaps the older of the two girls, already thinking of themselves, in terms of their gender identities, as LGBTQQIP2SAA or one of the variants that are encompassed by that ponderous acronym, even before the moment that was captured by the photograph?
Whobody knows?
I think the photograph would unquestionably be alarming if it were not for the presence of that woman in the photograph. Imagine the same photograph, but altered to remove that woman. That, I think, would be very alarming.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-21-2022).]
I've been so focused on the (putative) LGBTQQIP2SAA aspect of this photograph that I haven't (until now) considered whether what's happening there is a precursor or pre-existing condition for generic promiscuity and premature sexual activity on the part of the two young girls, as they progress closer towards and into their teens. Possibly without any LGBTQQIP2SAA aspect to it. Just the more "old fashioned" heterosexual kinds of promiscuity.
I think most mothers want the best for their children.
If only what I am suggesting is (likely) the mother or adult guardian figure in the photograph could speak...
I don't know. Maybe. Maybe it's something else. Like the mother is thinking "Hey girls, these people in the costumes are our neighbors. They're good people, for the most part. I don't want my two young girls hating on them. But the rules I have already told to them for encounters with strangers--people that are not already part of our life as a family--those rules they must still be mindful of."
Maybe this is a "New Age" mother of awesome intuition and intelligence.
I don't know. Maybe. Maybe it's something else. Like the mother is thinking "Hey girls, these people in the costumes are our neighbors. They're good people, for the most part. I don't want my two young girls hating on them. But the rules I have already told to them for encounters with strangers--people that are not already part of our life as a family--those rules they must still be mindful of."
Maybe this is a "New Age" mother of awesome intuition and intelligence.
"Prove me wrong."
Child grooming is befriending and establishing an emotional connection with a minor,[1][2] and sometimes the child's family, to lower the child's inhibitions with the objective of sexual abuse.
Let the children be children. Stop trying to introduce sexuality into their lives. Let them grow up some. Damn, it's not that difficult.
I don't know. Maybe. Maybe it's something else. Like the mother is thinking "Hey girls, these people in the costumes are our neighbors. They're good people, for the most part. I don't want my two young girls hating on them. But the rules I have already told to them for encounters with strangers--people that are not already part of our life as a family--those rules they must still be mindful of."
Maybe this is a "New Age" mother of awesome intuition and intelligence.
"Prove me wrong."
Yeah, and maybe Hunter was just teaching teaching a gun safety class at the convent.
Maybe it's something else. Like the mother is thinking "Hey girls, these people in the costumes are our neighbors. They're good people, for the most part. I don't want my two young girls hating on them.
Maybe this is a "New Age" mother of awesome intuition and intelligence.
Good people huh, who just do bad things,and that makes the bad things ok? So to you it isn't ok to dislike what is happening there and teach kids it is wrong?
Originally posted by 2.5: Good people huh, who just do bad things,and that makes the bad things ok? So to you it isn't ok to dislike what is happening there and teach kids it is wrong?
I don't know about the costumed figures. They could be doing this as a grooming strategy or tactic. Pedophiles "on the groom"... the targets being the two very young girls. I think it's important to consider the possibility that the woman in the center of the photograph, who I have hypothesized is the mother or guardian of the two young girls, has other ideas about it. But it's only important in a theoretical sense. It's like a Rorschach test or exercise.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-22-2022).]
Originally posted by rinselberg: I think it's important to consider the possibility that the woman in the center of the photograph, who I have hypothesized is the mother or guardian of the two young girls...
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 07-22-2022).]
Good people huh, who just do bad things,and that makes the bad things ok? So to you it isn't ok to dislike what is happening there and teach kids it is wrong?
It's amazing to watch a Leftist concoct a twisted bullshit story while trying to make an obvious photo of two small children handling a huge, purple, upholstered, faux phallus somehow "OK".
quote
Originally posted by randye:
When Leftists are merrily displaying who and what they really are, let them.
Leftists gotta Leftist
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 07-22-2022).]
Originally posted by williegoat: Sometimes, what it looks like is exactly what it is.
Yeah, that's been one of my persistent thoughts about January 6.
What I have seen (video) and read (online) doesn't look like something that could ever be minimized as "trespassing", or a peaceful "Stop the Steal" rally that just happened, by no one's actual design, to have gotten a little rowdy, or a "false flag" operation orchestrated by Antifa infilatrators or undercover FBI assets and informers. Or "what have you."
Sometimes, what it looks like is exactly what it is: an insurrection.
The cookies are inside that mock, vanilla or cream-iced cupcake that is actually a jar. It's not what it looks like.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-22-2022).]
Having already established in this thread that a Leftist will fabricate a painfully twisted narrative to attempt to make an obvious photo into something other than what it manifestly is, your instructive illustrations are probably wasted.
.
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
What I have seen (video) and read (online) .....
They are unquestioning, incurious and uncritical, while constantly devouring and then regurgitating an endless stream of obvious propaganda.
They will see what they are told to see and think what they are told to think because:
Leftists gotta Leftist
...even when the self delusion is obvious
.
The first day that a Leftist engages in actual, meaningful, critical thinking is the last day that he is one.
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 07-22-2022).]
those who support that rebellion are traitors NOT tourists while they can be trespassers they also are in rebellion while I do not like state killing an exception for treason is possible I am sure they can do the time for trespass before they are HUNG FOR TREASON
btw what level of support makes the supporter a CO-DEFENDANT ? SENDING MONEY sending people recruiting posts like randye's lying about who they were or what they wanted to do [they wanted to kill the VP] THAT IS TREASON
SO IS RANDYE COMMITTING TREASON HERE ?
------------------ Question wonder and be wierd are you kind?
those who support that rebellion are traitors NOT tourists while they can be trespassers they also are in rebellion while I do not like state killing an exception for treason is possible I am sure they can do the time for trespass before they are HUNG FOR TREASON
btw what level of support makes the supporter a CO-DEFENDANT ? SENDING MONEY sending people recruiting posts like randye's lying about who they were or what they wanted to do [they wanted to kill the VP] THAT IS TREASON
those who support that rebellion are traitors NOT tourists while they can be trespassers they also are in rebellion while I do not like state killing an exception for treason is possible I am sure they can do the time for trespass before they are HUNG FOR TREASON
btw what level of support makes the supporter a CO-DEFENDANT ? SENDING MONEY sending people recruiting posts like randye's lying about who they were or what they wanted to do [they wanted to kill the VP] THAT IS TREASON
The Bidens and the Clintons have done FAR more damage to our country than a handful of flag waving cartoon characters could possibly do.
The left is going to have to face the reality that language describes and instructs, but it does not create anything. They can call a spear carrying moron a deadly insurrectionist, but in reality he is just a kid in a funny hat. I can call someone a leftist, but until he acts in support of leftist ideology, he is just a keyboard clicking basement dweller.
The only person who was killed on Jan 6 was killed by the US government. The deadly insurrection happened in November of 2020. The deaths are still going on in St Louis, Chicago, Afghanistan and Ukraine.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-23-2022).]
original guy PLUS 7 OTHERS ALL Gop ONLY REAL VOTE FRAUD CONVICTIONS OF THE RUMP ERA ALL Gop
[ONLY ELECTION PROVEN TO BE EFFECTED] NOTE NO proof of any real election effecting fraud by the demo's anywhere in 2016 to 2020 elections vs court convictions for the Gop
when will your side stop lying about the elections
are there any rational Gop-er left are they all 100% nut-con's trumpets ?
Former U.S. Congressman and Philadelphia Political Operative Pleads Guilty to Election Fraud Charges
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams announced today that former U.S. Congressman Michael “Ozzie” Myers, 79, of Philadelphia, PA, pleaded guilty today to conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, and conspiring to illegally vote in a federal election for orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.
Only the GOP? Or do you want to fall back and punt after you attempt to move the goalpost?
original guy PLUS 7 OTHERS ALL Gop ONLY REAL VOTE FRAUD CONVICTIONS OF THE RUMP ERA ALL Gop
[ONLY ELECTION PROVEN TO BE EFFECTED] NOTE NO proof of any real election effecting fraud by the demo's anywhere in 2016 to 2020 elections vs court convictions for the Gop
when will your side stop lying about the elections
are there any rational Gop-er left are they all 100% nut-con's trumpets ?
Demuro, who was charged separately and pleaded guilty in May 2020, was responsible for overseeing the entire election process and all voter activities of his Division in accord with federal and state election laws.
as may is before November that guy did NOT fix or effect the nov 2020 election of the CIC you know the one the rump lost the one in question
the one that matters
SWING AND YET ANOTHER MISS
still no proof of the rump's loss by frauds in 2020
------------------ Question wonder and be wierd are you kind?
NOTE NO proof of any real election effecting fraud by the demo's anywhere in 2016 to 2020 elections vs court convictions for the Gop
There's the goalposts. You brought up 2016. Don't pretend it doesn't count because your worshipful Democrats did it and oh that's different or it wasn't as bad. Thief is a thief, liar is a liar and a under medicated haiku spouter is not a worthwhile political commentator
[This message has been edited by AlanD (edited 07-24-2022).]
There's the goalposts. You brought up 2016. Don't pretend it doesn't count because your worshipful Democrats did it and oh that's different or it wasn't as bad. Thief is a thief, liar is a liar and a under medicated haiku spouter is not a worthwhile political commentator
really ?
one guy in a local precinct in a demo city got caught
so what
and no trump votes moved miscounted or anything
but it matters so attack the capital and hang pence is the only solution
Yup all good since it doesn't meet your criteria for election fraud. Can't admit that a Democrat - an elected Congressman - was buying and selling votes. You are called on the BS line of it's always Republicans, you hand wave it away. Just because you are blind to the faults of the people you worship, don't expect me to follow you down the path of ignorance.
It's more like: "The Lost, Not Stolen, Ability Of Leftists To Think Critically"
Gullibility is obviously a Leftist genetic trait. It's what makes them prime targets, consumers and pukers of propaganda.
86 year old John Claggett Danforth and his fellow 7 RINO Never-Trumpers have been pumping out their vitriol since before Trump took office and it intensified just months after his inauguration and hasn't abated since.
John Claggett Danforth and his 7 political dwarfs have an agenda that they want to push.
John Claggett Danforth and his 7 political has-beens do NOT speak for conservatives or conservatism but their arrogance makes them believe they do.
John Claggett Danforth and his kind of feckless faux conservatives and their arrogance are what gave rise to Trump populism to begin with.
John Claggett Danforth has been pissed off at the Republican party since George W. Bush named Dick Cheney as his running mate instead of him.
.
Leftists gotta Leftist
...even when they try to use has-been RINOS to do it
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 07-24-2022).]
