You asked the same question to a group of white people you would have received the same percentage outcomes.
Group all those, regardless of race, in the yes and no camps. Then ask a question about what their political ideologies are.
100% of all those, regardless of race, in the no camp would identify themselves as leftist democrats.
Hating Caucasians, Asians and Jews is a leftist ideology hate group.
It is driven by envy for the purpose of stealing and grifting from people. If they could get away with it legally, they would lench and kill you. This isn't about race, it's about political ideology.
It's only a 1000-person poll so I'm not too worried about it. However, it's too bad Scott focused on the negative side of the results. A more positive take would have been to encourage that 53% of open-minded Blacks to collaborate with philanthropic Whites in an effort to reach out to the Undecideds. (I assume the other demographic is a lost cause.)
Deterrence. Behavior modification by fear. Sure, A stun device integral with a neck collar, remotely activated, and in the future, by detected levels of hormones, testosterone, blood pressure, pulse rate, facial vascular flow... Think of how well behaved the students would be, attentive, conscientious, ambitious, happy and learning. Earning freedom and the right to be an American with the privileges of citizenship. Having the future linebacker make it out of (junior) high school alive, training him to direct his aggression against the other team's center. Halfway across the hallway, he gets the jolt, flopping flat, then wetting himself, twitching in convulsions as the zap-pack kicks in consecutively. Bzzzzttt ! Phhht ! Bzzzzttt ! Phhht ! ' The.. the.. the.. teacher took my game-toy, I want my game -toy ! ' What the actual eff ! The kid definitely has an obvious learning disability, and more, the teacher should have been able to observe that fact. ' Hey kid, welcome to the cellblock, would you like a lollipop ? ' ' Yeah, you like lollipops, kid ? '
[This message has been edited by Valkrie9 (edited 02-24-2023).]
Taking the 'muh gentle giants' Nintendo Switch was racist. ChatR.I. cabal bot will say this is due too:
Climate change
Global warming
Da-rump
Not enough BBB for schools
No reparations
Wasn't given hormones for his transition
Nuclear family values
Not given enough free stuff
Christianity
White supremacy
Capitalism
And whatever evil is in 'it's' delusional programmed AI silicone mesh the sick cult can program/make up.
No matter what today's progressive Marxists taught from the new branch locations of the Frankfurter Schule of social theory and critical philosophy, the bad social percentages/stats keep rising from a group of only 13% of its citizens.
WonderBoy: What has improved? ChatR.I. bot: They dominate on physically aggressive sports teams. WonderBoy:
This is done/allowed/tolerated by design... Usher in NWO.
I guess some of the messages in this thread, which were posted yesterday, were part of the preparation or run-up for today.
National Tartar Sauce Day.
There's quite the "treatise" on it here. You can quickly scroll through two or three pages worth of Tartar Sauce-related expository writing. https://nationaltoday.com/n...al-tartar-sauce-day/ What is February 24?
It's a tell when certain members post their habitual, superficial, unsupported and unsupportable screeds about the "Left" and "Leftists".
This is the same crowd that had the impulse to come here as they did, not that many months ago, and reveal their large ignorance of American history by asserting—more or less "out of the blue"—that a large rally that was organized by the pro-Nazi German American Bund on February 20, 1939, at New York City's Madison Square Garden, can fairly be described as a gathering of "Leftists".
To call that well remembered event a gathering of "right-wingers" could be a somewhat misleading oversimplification, but how much more misleading is it to call it a gathering of "Leftists"..? This is how much more misleading: It's so much more misleading that if you hooked that statement up to one of those $29.99 Chinese Communist-made "American History Ignorance Meters", it would literally waste the low-quality needle gauge bearing by pegging the Ignorance needle suddenly and violently all the way to the High end of the range.
I remember that forum post as clearly "as a bell". If I worked at it, I might be able to find it again, although that's not a given, because neither the Pennock's Search option or even Google (you can Google this forum specifically by using the Google Advanced interface) has proven as reliable for me as I would like. But if you are weighing the credibility of my testimony on this point, consider the vividness of my description of it.
It's unfortunate (albeit in the smallest of ways) to see that same crowd "at it again", and especially on this very special day.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-24-2023).]
That idea about the Nazis as "socialists"... in name only.
In the aftermath of the Great War or World War One as it would later come to be known, "AH" took control of a relatively small political party that had the German word for "socialist" in its name. AH renamed it, adding the German word for "nationalist", and that's how AH and his followers came to be known as the "Nazis". "Nazi" being a contraction of the German language two-words phrase for "National Socialist".
During the Night of the Long Knives, AH murderously purged the Nazi party of its most prominent socialism-minded adherents—most famously, Ernst Röhm.
Otto Strasser, another prominent Nazi with a socialist bent, survived by anticipating the Night of the Long Knives. He had fled from Germany and took up residence in Czechoslovakia when the "Knives" went down. He lived until 1974.
Credit also to "ray b", who has already said as much on this forum, in some of his fairly recent posts. (I remember.)
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-24-2023).]
That idea about the Nazis as "socialists"... in name only.
In the aftermath of the Great War or World War One as it would later come to be known, "AH" took control of a relatively small political party that had the German word for "socialist" in its name. AH renamed it, adding the German word for "nationalist", and that's how AH and his followers came to be known as the "Nazis". "Nazi" being a contraction of the German language two-words phrase for "National Socialist".
During the Night of the Long Knives, AH murderously purged the Nazi party of its most prominent socialism-minded adherents—most famously, Ernst Röhm.
Otto Strasser, another prominent Nazi with a socialist bent, survived by anticipating the Night of the Long Knives. He had fled from Germany and took up residence in Czechoslovakia when the "Knives" went down. He lived until 1974.
Credit also to "ray b", who has already said as much on this forum, in some of his fairly recent posts. (I remember.)
So what you are trying to say is that Nazis started out as socialists, they took people that were starving got them brain washed and then when they had power kill off the all of those that opposed them...Including those in the party Seems like this socialist crap is way to easy to take advantage of then wipe out when it doesn't fit an agenda.
So what you are trying to say is that Nazis started out as socialists, they took people that were starving got them brain washed and then when they had power kill off the all of those that opposed them...Including those in the party Seems like this socialist crap is way to easy to take advantage of then wipe out when it doesn't fit an agenda.
The pie chart says that in the aftermath of the Great War, from 1919 to 1933, only 10 percent of the socialism-minded "actives" in Germany liked the Nazi Party or tried to work within it as political activists. The other 90 percent did not.
Could I back this up with credible evidence?
Maybe.
But think about this as a possibility that Jake_Dragon seems not to be considering.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-24-2023).]
That idea about the Nazis as "socialists"... in name only
Unlettered Leftist children desperately attempting to "right-wash" their Marxist / National Socialist heritage will always run face first into the hard wall of the reality of Hitler's own words:
.........
“The hammer will once more become the symbol of the German worker and the sickle the sign of the German peasant. I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism" is based on Marx." – May 1, 1934, May Day speech in Berlin
"National Socialism derives from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism." Interview of Adolph Hitler by Hanns Johst in Frankforter Volksblatt (January 27, 1934)
"Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid." Speech by Adolf Hitler, On National Socialism and World Relations, delivered in the German Reichstag (January 30, 1937)
“Germany’s economic policy is conducted exclusively in accordance with the interests of the German people. In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people.” – February 24, 1941, speech on the 21st anniversary of the Nazi Party
“All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.
After all, that’s exactly why we call ourselves National Socialists! We want to start by implementing socialism in our nation among our Volk! It is not until the individual nations are socialist that they can address themselves to international socialism.
What Marxism, Leninism, and Stalinism failed to accomplish, we shall be in a position to achieve.” – March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day
“There is a difference between the theoretical knowledge of socialism and the practical life of socialism. People are not born socialists, but must first be taught how to become them.” – October 5, 1937, speech in Berlin
“Socialism as the final concept of duty, the ethical duty of work, not just for oneself but also for one’s fellow man’s sake, and above all the principle: Common good before own good, a struggle against all parasitism and especially against easy and unearned income. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but our own people. We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that socialism is inseparable from nationalism.” – August 15, 1920, speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus.
“To put it quite clearly: we have an economic program. Point 13 in that program demands the nationalization of all public companies, in other words socialization, or what is known here as socialism. … the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me? Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals anymore; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois press does me damage too and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.” – May 4, 1931, interview with Richard Breiting
“What they hate is the Germany which sets a dangerous example for them, this social Germany. It is the Germany of a social labor legislation which they already hated before the World War and which they still hate today. It is the Germany of social welfare, of social equality, of the elimination of class differences—this is what they hate! They hate this Germany which in the course of seven years has labored to afford its Volksgenossen a decent life. They hate this Germany which has eliminated unemployment, which, in spite of all their wealth, they have not been able to eliminate. This Germany which grants its laborers decent housing—this is what they hate because they have a feeling their own peoples could be ‘infected’ thereby. They hate this Germany of social legislation, this Germany which celebrates the first of May as the day of honest labor.” – May 8, 1939, speech “Party Comrades! My German Volksgenossen!” at the Bürgerbräukeller in Munich
........
There is more....A LOT MORE....for our pet Leftoids to try to deny.
We can even talk about the documentation of how the Nazis wrote their anti-jew, (Nuremburg), laws using the Southern Democrats anti- black / Jim Crow laws of the 1930s as their model.
^^ All of that is true. The denials of marxists around the inet, and all across the world is purposed to repeat the big lie. On every automotive forum, the marxists have made their presence known, to sing the party line, sweet notes and voices to grift you. It is the Constitution they attack, anathema to world domination by the dempartie and their masters, the ccp, cp, c. This war will have the effect of separating Americans defending the premises of the founding documents, from their enemies, foreign and domestic. See, their intolerance will be reciprocated, as it should be. ' Gotta keep them separated. ' They disparage all that has been created by the freedom affirmed by those brave revolutionaries, that defeated the old world. Saratoga, Freeman's Farm, Bemis Heights fjb and eff the old world, the Russians, eff them too. Well, no nation at war should sustain damaging sabotage, when culling would be an effective deterrent, suppressing the old world loyalists. A few weeks in the future : A prisoner exchange at a checkpoint on the eastern front in the Ukraine Welcomed with open arms and affection, teen-aged concubines, a villa on the Black Sea overlooking the Crimea, and an exotic car in the garage. ' Heil Hitler Komrade ! ' ' Da, Putin too ! '
If there must be war, let us begin by securing our lands from invasion. Biden_Joe isn't doing anything like that, is he ? ffs, somebody, do something. Like, before, a nuke burns NY, NY.
Could it be because he is a decrepit old fool, and a diddler ? Yeah ! fjb again ! Just Begun.
[This message has been edited by Valkrie9 (edited 02-25-2023).]
And no, putting people like diversity hire Sideshow Karine Jean-Pierre, is not a 'doing good' thing for the darker skin tone folk. Lying ***** .
An intersectionality diversity hire. Dems don't hire on competence and that's the reasoning why they have an inept administration.
Not a single press corps journalist that has to go to a White House press briefing has any respect for they. The corps know they is always lying, but that just to cover for the incompetence, not that they is doing it on purpose.
They was basically a medical college flunky that they let pass with a b/s degree because of DEI and got a job with Dems and MoveOn.org and now is Diaper Biden's mouthpiece.
[This message has been edited by Wichita (edited 02-26-2023).]
It's only a 1000-person poll so I'm not too worried about it. However, it's too bad Scott focused on the negative side of the results. A more positive take would have been to encourage that 53% of open-minded Blacks to collaborate with philanthropic Whites in an effort to reach out to the Undecideds. (I assume the other demographic is a lost cause.)
As an American Society working towards real inclusion until the leftist media took over and really started to make things a lot worse, on purpose of course.
This is when the incel leftist Millennials started to take over and push their agenda through the media. This chart explains a lot about how media influences public opinion on the matter.
As an American Society working towards real inclusion until the leftist media took over and really started to make things a lot worse, on purpose of course. This is when the incel leftist Millennials started to take over and push their agenda through the media.
This chart explains a lot about how media influences public opinion on the matter.
That chart doesn't provide any information whatsoever about media and what was being published or broadcast by media during the years since 2001.
A person can have their ideas about that (media) and line up their ideas against this Gallup Poll data, year by year. Looking for correlation, and (arguably) causation.
But that Gallup Poll data, in and of itself, doesn't say anything about media or media's influence on American society.
' Rachel Levine self identifies as... ' Got home after a long day's work, ' Honey, I'm home ', ' I'm in the den, Charles. ' She had dimmed the lights, lit a few scented candles, and was wearing that oriental silk negligee, supine on the sofa. ' Oh Rachel, you look wonderful tonight. ' That's just like Rachel, with the rose petals, and a slightly chilled Mosel Riesling, willing to please. Lady In Red See ? It's a fantasy, imagine, you and Rachel too.
[This message has been edited by Valkrie9 (edited 02-27-2023).]
As an American Society working towards real inclusion until the leftist media took over and really started to make things a lot worse, on purpose of course.
This is when the incel leftist Millennials started to take over and push their agenda through the media. This chart explains a lot about how media influences public opinion on the matter.
Someone’s got the beat, Daddy-o! Is that the snare drum?
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-28-2023).]
The pie chart says that in the aftermath of the Great War, from 1919 to 1933, only 10 percent of the socialism-minded "actives" in Germany liked the Nazi Party or tried to work within it as political activists. The other 90 percent did not.
Number of socialists in German parliament that voted to make Hitler Chancellor? 100%
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: Number of socialists in German parliament that voted to make Hitler Chancellor? 100%
I can't dispute that. I would want to look it up, to confirm it myself.
This pie chart that I created is for every German in that period who pushed for socialism, not just for the ones that were members of the German parliament and directly lent their hand to elevating Hitler to become Chancellor. As I said, it's not based on any actual data that I have. I just created it to make a point—or more accurately, to raise a question about something that Jake Dragon had said.
The aged German president, Paul Von Hindenburg, and the various others, including the German legislators, who gave their assent to installing Hitler as Chancellor, had different motives, depending on who they were.
Hindenburg and others were leery of Hitler and didn't particularly like Hitler or trust him, but they thought they could box in him, politically, and keep Hitler under control, while benefiting from his popularity. When Hitler was named Chancellor (if memory serves me) only three (a minority) of the Cabinet members that he appointed were Nazis. Hitler did that to assuage some of the fears about him.
It's said that the Communist legislators who voted to make Hitler Chancellor did so because they were confident that Hitler would soon make himself very unpopular and that the Communists would benefit from the chaos that they expected Hitler to foment.
I guess that could explain why some of the Socialist legislators went along with the idea of Hitler as Chancellor.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-01-2023).]
I guess that could explain why some of the Socialist legislators went along with the idea of Hitler as Chancellor.
Rinse...were you born dumb or just grow up that way ? Socialist and marxist belong in the grave. I'm a free man, dont answer to them and have no problem whatsoever putting the where they belong.
Not the 1st time I've beaten a commie to a pulp, probably wont be the last either. If I had my way, just ****ing shoot them.
