Your comment has nothing to do with my comment. All I was saying is that high voter turnout favors Democrats, and when voting is suppressed Republicans do better.
Got it.
Democrat voters don't pay attention to the real issues facing government.
Sorry, but, no, you don't get it at all. There is no connection between your comment and my post that you quoted.
Voter suppression has nothing to do with knowledge of the issues.
Joe, don't waste your time... this is the back and forth nonsense that Fred constantly posts where he tries to re-frame the argument for no other purpose than to "win" the argument under his rules. Which becomes a total time waster. There's the old adage... don't roll in the mud with pigs unless you want to get filthy.
I get absolutely nothing of discussion from him, except regurgitation of liberal talking points, and propagandist links.
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: Joe, don't waste your time... this is the back and forth nonsense that Fred constantly posts where he tries to re-frame the argument for no other purpose than to "win" the argument under his rules. Which becomes a total time waster. There's the old adage... don't roll in the mud with pigs unless you want to get filthy.
I get absolutely nothing of discussion from him, except regurgitation of liberal talking points, and propagandist links.
Sorry to take this thread OT, but this is another example of TA 82 making a post that has nothing to do with the subject of the thread but is simply an ad hominin attack against me.
This post is another FACT that proves TA82 is more obsessed with attacking me than discussing any topic. He does this all the time.
And I NEVER do it. That is an objective fact, not a subjective opinion like TA82 constantly posts and tries to pass off as fact.
Not really. It is just something I don't do. I get into heated discussions, but I never just randomly make an insulting personal attack in a post that is not in response to anyone else and has nothing to do with the subject matter of the discussion.
I point it out everytime TA82 does it and ask everyone to point it out if I ever do it. So far zero.
91 charges of crime against Trump, 91 counts against 'rump.' If one of the judges should happen to quash, 88 charges that Trump has to squash.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee
quote
The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case on Wednesday dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump, but many other counts in the indictment remain.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote in an order that six of the counts in the indictment must be quashed, including three against Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee.
But the order leaves intact other [all] charges, and the judge wrote that [the] prosecutors could seek a new indictment on the [ same] charges [that] he dismissed.
"Judge dismisses some charges against Trump in Georgia election interference case" Kate Brumback of the Associated Press for PBS News Hour online; March 13, 2024. https://www.pbs.org/newshou...on-interference-case
quote
"As written, these six counts contain all the essential elements of the crimes but fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission, i.e., the underlying felony solicited," McAfee wrote. "They do not give the Defendants enough information to prepare their defenses intelligently, as the Defendants could have violated the Constitutions and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways."
