Everybody, including you, knows that [BIngB] is the third (at least) incarnation of toast, just as furgal was keel and sourmash was mentalfloss. You, and a few others support it just as you support Biden, because it benefits your personal agenda.
Have fun. You’re not fooling anybody.
What's my personal agenda?
I think maybe I "do" this Politics (& Religion) section, and Totally O/T to a certain extent, for the same reasons that some people like to work on the Crossword Puzzles that are offered on venues like the New York Times. It's like a game. Can I think of a new way to react to Wichita's memes and cartoons, which (with the occasional exception) are what I have called "Eye Trash"..? Can I sharpen up my presentation of certain climate and global warming-related topics, going back to points I have already presented before, but upgrading the clarity of my wording and organization as I blend in updates from more recent reports?
I'm not convinced that BingB and "fredtoast" are the same person. BingB is coming across to me as somewhat less "in your face," compared to "fredtoast"... not so very directly confrontational as was "fredtoast."
I hope you are not giving any credence to the forum's most vacuous rightwing blowhard, whose estimation of his prowess at ferreting out online imposters is as comically exaggerated as everything else that he brags about.
This could be the start of something very unsavory, where if someone doesn't agree with someone else's idea or opinion, they just play the YOU'RE AN IMPOSTER "card."
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-02-2024).]
Everybody, including you, knows that bing is the third (at least) incarnation of toast, just as furgal was keel and sourmash was mentalfloss. You, and a few others support it just as you support Biden, because it benefits your personal agenda.
Have fun. You’re not fooling anybody.
I don't know WTF this is all about, but here is the thing. I don't break any rules that will get me banned. I don't use personal insults, or post misinformation, or whatever all these other guys did. So what is the big deal?
I don't even "pick a side". I don't support Biden. In some threads I will be on one "side" and on the other "side" on other issues. So how am I supporting anyone's "personal agenda".
I oppose extremists from BOTH sides. I can see that you fit that bill, but if there is a debate on "defund the police" or immigration I will probably be on your "side". I may not agree with some of your more extreme recommendations, but we will be on the same side in principle.
This could be the start of something very unsavory, where if someone doesn't agree with someone else's idea or opinion, they just play the YOU'RE AN IMPOSTER "card."
Or along the same lines... I've lost track of how many times I've been accused of having multiple usernames here... by insecure people who simply refuse to believe that multiple individuals could possibly voice an opinion contrary to what they themselves hold near and dear.
I oppose extremists from BOTH sides. I can see that you fit that bill, but if there is a debate on "defund the police" or immigration I will probably be on your "side". I may not agree with some of your more extreme recommendations, but we will be on the same side in principle.
I take pride in my Conservative extremism.
I am not a "middle of the road" kind of guy. The middle of the road is where you find broken bottles and bits of blown tires.
I don't understand this argument at all. Why would they want to do that? What do they have to gain? It just doesn't make any sense to claim they want to destroy everything that is good.
The only way they maintain power is to win elections. Only way they win elections is by making voters happy. So destroying everything that is good just means they lose power.
Originally posted by randye: Since you believe that you have that all ferreted out for yourself now tell us who your Left wing "extremists" are on this forum.
So far just Ray b.
Patrick and Rinse are on the left, but they don't behave like extremists.
I don't understand this argument at all. Why would they want to do that? What do they have to gain? It just doesn't make any sense to claim they want to destroy everything that is good.
The only way they maintain power is to win elections. Only way they win elections is by making voters happy. So destroying everything that is good just means they lose power.
No one gains power by destroying everything that is good. How would that work?
It's been said that America is one generation away from losing its freedoms. We already have a political elite class, something the Founders tried to prevent when they set up a representative government. Our government has turned into a huge bureaucracy where lawmakers have turned regulation over to the unelected to flesh out the laws, something else not envisioned by the Founders. Is it that hard to imagine a political class that turns our system of government to their own benefit? Or worse....
Power corrupts, and most of our population doesn't know enough, or care enough, about our history to realize how far from our founding principles to care.
[This message has been edited by olejoedad (edited 01-03-2024).]
Yeah! That would be uncouth, gauche, even, almost like an invasion or something. You cannot possibly be a history teacher.
I am not talking about invading a foreign country. I am talking about a political party whose plan to maintain power included destroying everything that is good.
I am not talking about invading a foreign country. I am talking about a political party whose plan to maintain power included destroying everything that is good.
It's been said that America is one generation away from losing its freedoms. We already have a political elite class, something the Founders tried to prevent when they set up a representative government. Our government has turned into a huge bureaucracy where lawmakers have turned regulation over to the unelected to flesh out the laws, something else not envisioned by the Founders. Is it that hard to imagine a political class that turns our system of government to their own benefit? Or worse....
Power corrupts, and most of our population doesn't know enough, or care enough, about our history to realize how far from our founding principles to care.
Sorry, but none of this has anything to do with "destroying everything that is good".
Who is in the "political elite class"? Wouldn't that just be the economically elite class? And doesn't that include members from both parties? If not then what is then difference between "political elite" and "economic elite"?
Bureaucratic administrative policy is a problem. I agree with that, but both sides do it and it has nothing to do with trying to destroy everything that is good.
Any "political class" or "economic class" that turns the government to their own benefit will be voted out of office. That is why I say our "founding principles" are still working just fine. Neither party has been able to take over the government. The power has shifted back and forth for hundreds of years, and there is no sign that it is changing now. In fact the congress is about as evenly split as it ever has been.
So still wwiating to hear how the left plans to benefit by destroying everything that is good.
one kid who was in a relationship assaulted one girl
And you think that is OK? Is that part of your "sex, drugs and rock n' roll" religion? It's not rape if the two minors used to have "a relationship"? That is not healthy. You should seek help. Or move to Iran, where you will be among like minds.
Why did the school board try to cover it up? Why did they bring the superintendent up on charges? Why does the family have a law suite against the school board? You can not trust the trans she/it
I take pride in my Conservative extremism. I am not a "middle of the road" kind of guy. The middle of the road is where you find broken bottles and bits of blown tires.
I liked AuH2O BUT HE LOST
and the center is AMERICA THE MASS OF PEOPLE ARE OUR CENTER AT MINIMUM IN THE LANE GOING SOMEWHERE NOT BLOCKING OR DRIVING CRAZY and zero points for being off the pavement and in the DITCH AT THE FAR FAR RIGHT
A POINT TOTALLY AND CON-INSISTENTLY MISSED BY THE RIGHT they were torys not founders the slavers not ever liberators racist's not the civil rights marchers war mongers not the anti-war marchers sexist not the liberated god bothered about most gay trans ect so the PROBLEMS NOT the solution to anything EVERYTIME
Why did the school board try to cover it up? Why did they bring the superintendent up on charges? Why does the family have a law suite against the school board? You can not trust the trans she/it
why do you claim to care so much
how many date rapes happen between nontrans kids why is any other persons sex life your obsession if trans or not
How does the "Wichita" movement describe these people? Are these people "leftists"..? Are they bad people? Are they bad people who are not leftists? Is "bad people who are not leftists" an idea that Wichita-ism concedes is a possibility? It's an obvious question, in that the Wichita movement very seldom singles out any persons or groups as "bad," without also calling them "leftists."
But before sorting this out, the "Make America Wichita" movement would have to be aware of these people.
"Florida school board recommends ouster of Moms for Liberty co-founder over Republican sex scandal" Curt Anderson, Associated Press; PBS News Hour; December 12, 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshou...publican-sex-scandal
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-08-2024).]
No. Not at all. I do not understand that argument at all
quote
Originally posted by BingB: Sorry, but none of this has anything to do with "destroying everything that is good".
Who is in the "political elite class"? Wouldn't that just be the economically elite class? And doesn't that include members from both parties? If not then what is then difference between "political elite" and "economic elite"?
Bureaucratic administrative policy is a problem. I agree with that, but both sides do it and it has nothing to do with trying to destroy everything that is good.
Any "political class" or "economic class" that turns the government to their own benefit will be voted out of office. That is why I say our "founding principles" are still working just fine. Neither party has been able to take over the government. The power has shifted back and forth for hundreds of years, and there is no sign that it is changing now. In fact the congress is about as evenly split as it ever has been.
So still wwiating to hear how the left plans to benefit by destroying everything that is good.
You're just "starting" to? It's been pretty obvious for awhile that jdv needs a different hobby. Maybe he should consider getting a Fiero and tinkering with it.
[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 02-12-2024).]
You're just "starting" to? It's been pretty obvious for awhile that jdv needs a different hobby. Maybe he should consider getting a Fiero and tinkering with it.
quote
Originally posted by williegoat:
I'm starting to see a pattern here.
For those who are a little slow on the uptake, the problem has been obvious for quite some time.
