Did you guys know that illegals are getting Medicaid? I had lunch with an old friend last Friday, and I didn’t believe it… but he mentioned that he was volunteering at the Latin American Center which was just down the street from his house in Atlanta, and he caught on when he was seeing signs for getting them signed up for SNAP and Medicaid.
I mean, this dude seems like a nice guy… but it infuriates me that illegals are prioritized over literally everyone else, especially American citizens. https://rumble.com/v4lkmi3-...-free-stuff-fro.html
Why is Joe Biden trying to get as many illegals into the country as possible?
Qualified means one of the following: - Qualified alien children under 18 years old - Refugees admitted under section 207 of INA (includes victims of severe forms of trafficking) - Victims of Trafficking under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 - Asylees under Section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) - Deportation withheld under 243(h) or 241(b)(3) of INA
Qualified means one of the following: - Is granted asylum; - Is admitted to the U.S. as a refugee; - Is paroled into the U.S. for a period of at least one year; - Has been granted withholding of deportation; - Has been granted conditional entry;
I remember when leftists said illegals didn’t cost us anything, and paid more taxes than it cost the community.
It is the Cloward-Piven strategy. This also explains a question that one of our less experienced Leftist troublemakers keeps repeating: "Why would a politician want to destroy the economy?"
It is all part of a plan that has been in place since LBJ: the "Great Society", the "welfare state".
World War Three will be a "Global Civil War". It will be free men against the aristocracy.
The ruling class has co-opted the "migrants", knowing that the middle class will be their adversaries.
A song about a curfew has become prescient: "The battle lines are being drawn. Nobody's right when everybody's wrong."
No one wants a Global Civil War... we just need left-leaning people to WAKE UP and realize what they're supporting.
I'm convinced that through the 1990s, under Bush Sr., it was mostly the Republicans who were doing this same **** . I really consider Bush Sr. to be the first "globalist-agenda" president. And not like Nixon going to China, I mean where they hold the United States beneath the rest of the world, and do the bidding of others higher up.
This has SOLIDLY shifted to the Democrats... and we desperately need Democrats to wake up to see what they're supporting.
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: No one wants a Global Civil War... we just need left-leaning people to WAKE UP and realize what they're supporting.
I'm convinced that through the 1990s, under Bush Sr., it was mostly the Republicans who were doing this same **** . I really consider Bush Sr. to be the first "globalist-agenda" president. And not like Nixon going to China, I mean where they hold the United States beneath the rest of the world, and do the bidding of others higher up.
This has SOLIDLY shifted to the Democrats... and we desperately need Democrats to wake up to see what they're supporting.
SOME DO FAR TOO MUCH
want all the BS in the back of that book too come true when the jew rebuild the temple ... then he will come [back] but just because the book claimed death and destruction their is no need to try and make it RIGHT now
WHEN WOKE BEGAN the rightwing freaked to the max they hate anyone who knows what is happening and sees thru their lies
and yes the evil nixon in china was a beginning of a curse if never far far better and the reds could have would have fallen there toooo instead we are cursed with greedy reds instead of dogmatic ones just an other nut-con screw up on the globe
You asked 'why' would Joe Biden want to do this? I think there are many reasons, but here are a few that I think are pretty clear:
1) US birthrate is in decline which means schools and teacher's unions will get less tax dollars, so the new folks provide an immediate injection of students and the promise of more to come, since they likely still believe in having larger families.
2) Blue states acquire more bodies to be counted in the 2030 Federal Census, which transfers Congressional power from Red states to Blue states, by virtue of adding more Congressmen/women/people/whatever.
3) After providing a 'path to citizenship,' these imported folks and their future children will vote Democrat for the next 100 years. There will never be another Republican President after 2028 or so.
4) Dang, there was a 4th obvious reason, but blimey, I can't think of it just now ... (got it! Cheap labor!)
[This message has been edited by Notorio (edited 03-26-2024).]
Let us pose the obvious question, ' At what point in his political career has Biden_Joe ever been correct ? ' See, the problem that Biden_Joe has, is the vast majority of newcomers are escaping marxist and communist dictatorships, and having finally arrived on American soil where their rights have protection, I am sure they will be most certain to vote for the party that will uphold those rights, right ? An arduous journey of six months of walking, somehow avoiding the ravages of highwaymen, armed with machine-guns, only to arrive in Texas, and being told that your Constitutional rights are to be cancelled by marxists inside the government ! That won't endear them to the dempartie, in fact, they'll vote Trump because they believe him, believe in him, a savior of their dreams, a savior of their new Nation, their new homes, and their pursuit of happiness. Biden _Joe plotting to infringe on their rights, scheming to enrich himself some more, a never ending grift, always has been a red handed thief. Dangling the Biden_Joe_Klan from high arches of light posts outside the Capitol building, making a spectacle, sightseers driving by, ' Look pa ! That's Biden_Hunter, the ravens are getting his soft parts ! ' ' There's the Big Guy himself, looks like he's sharted his last, always trying to get the final fart out ! ' fjb with an indictment for treason ! [ uscode_house_guv/title18/part1/chapter115 ] What sentence does the Biden_Joe_Klan deserve for their crimes ? What does the Law say ? Dangling ! Dangle the Biden_Joe_Klan ! Stretching all the dirty rotten scoundrels !
An interesting proposition, but you are assuming that these folks will Hear or Read about those warning signs. Are there ANY Spanish language conservative radio stations, newspapers, or news organizations??
An interesting proposition, but you are assuming that these folks will Hear or Read about those warning signs. Are there ANY Spanish language conservative radio stations, newspapers, or news organizations??
It never fails to amaze me how people will completely twist reality to fit what they want to believe.
For example the writer of this article claims both that Biden was trying to work with the President of Mexico to reduce immigration and also that Biden is trying to increase the flow of immigrants across the southern border. He completely contradicts himself but none of the right wingers who read this call him out on it.
2) Blue states acquire more bodies to be counted in the 2030 Federal Census, which transfers Congressional power from Red states to Blue states, by virtue of adding more Congressmen/women/people/whatever.
Texas and Arizone are red states. So republicans will get the benefit, not democrats.
It never fails to amaze me how people will completely twist reality to fit what they want to believe.
For example the writer of this article claims both that Biden was trying to work with the President of Mexico to reduce immigration and also that Biden is trying to increase the flow of immigrants across the southern border. He completely contradicts himself but none of the right wingers who read this call him out on it.
I didn't read the article (don't need to), nor did I post it. But I want you to answer two questions. I INSIST on you answering these two questions, and I do not want you to deflect, change the subject, or respond in kind with another question. I demand you answer these two questions:
- Explain to me why Biden eliminated the "Remain in Mexico" order, literally within a week of getting into office. - Explain why Biden immediately removed all border wall materials (that were in the process of being added and constructed), had them immediately sold off, scrapped, and destroyed as quickly as possible
3) After providing a 'path to citizenship,' these imported folks and their future children will vote Democrat for the next 100 years. There will never be another Republican President after 2028 or so.
Citizens vote for the people who serve them the best. Why can't Republicans win votes by serving their needs the best?
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: I didn't read the article (don't need to), nor did I post it. But I want you to answer two questions. I INSIST on you answering these two questions, and I do not want you to deflect, change the subject, or respond in kind with another question. I demand you answer these two questions:
- Explain to me why Biden eliminated the "Remain in Mexico" order, literally within a week of getting into office. - Explain why Biden immediately removed all border wall materials (that were in the process of being added and constructed), had them immediately sold off, scrapped, and destroyed as quickly as possible
I don't know.
I don't agree with Bidens border policies, so I don't defend them.
That is why I want congressional action instead of just leaving these policies to the whim of the current President. It is funny how I have seen you make posts complaining about how executive orders and administrative regulations subvert the Constitution. But when it comes to fixing the border you don't want congress to fix anything because that would take away your main attack on Biden. You care more about the politics of the situation than actually fixing the situation.
I don't agree with Bidens border policies, so I don't defend them.
That is why I want congressional action instead of just leaving these policies to the whim of the current President. It is funny how I have seen you make posts complaining about how executive orders and administrative regulations subvert the Constitution. But when it comes to fixing the border you don't want congress to fix anything because that would take away your main attack on Biden. You care more about the politics of the situation than actually fixing the situation.
No, this is a bull **** cop out.
Congress already has laws on the books... Biden is disobeying them.
... and this... "You care more about the politics of the situation than actually fixing the situation."
This is so absolutely not true. Either you're retarded as a rock, or this is exactly what you're doing. I could give to shits if a gay transvestite crippled blind pregnant woman became president under the Pride Party of America. If that person is going to stop illegal immigration, and stop ludicrous spending, then I'll vote for that person. YOU, Fred... are the one who is so stuck on politics.
I could give to shits if a gay transvestite crippled blind pregnant woman became president under the Pride Party of America. If that person is going to stop illegal immigration, and stop ludicrous spending, then I'll vote for that person.
Then why do you get so upset with the idea of Congress fixing the problem before the election?
Isn't this the same 82-TA who claimed that executive orders were an improper power grab by the President and that laws should be formulated in congress instead of by executive orders?
Which laws specifically is Biden Biden disobeying?
Was Trump also disobeying these same immigration laws in 2019 when we could not control the immigration problem on our southern border?
SCOTUS has ruled that we can't go back to Title 42 now that covid pandemic is over. That is what Trump used to address the problem.
Title 42 deals with Public Health and Welfare in the U.S.C., and you're randomly throwing out "Title 42" which literally has thousands and thousands of laws in it, as if that's supposed to mean something. What are you even referring to? Are you referring to where he prevented ANYONE from coming across during the pandemic?
Anyway, there are several laws that Biden is VIOLATING by the act of NOT ENFORCING them. The U.S. Constitution states that the President should "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Until it started to really hurt his chances for re-election, he wanted as many illegals in the country as possible (see my post regarding Soros, elections, future Democrats, etc.). Your response of "I don't know why Biden did these things..." Yes you do. Like I said, you're either retarded, or are intentionally being a dumb-ass.
President Biden is also NOT enforcing the following laws:
U.S.C. Title 8 § 1227 (part of the named law, Immigration and Nationality Act)
Specifically, U.S.C. 8 § 1227(a)(1)(C)(i) - Nonimmigrant status violators
An immigrant who comes across the border (not through a port of entry), is considered to have violated condition of entry. They come across seeking "refugee status." People from China (unless they're Uyghurs), people from Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia, Panama, Ecuadore, etc... etc... these are not refugees. Furthermore, all of the illegals from Haiti, up until literally just a month ago, also were not refugees. The ONLY people who actually did qualify as refugees were Cubans (fleeing Communism), and Venezuelans (also fleeing Communism). And Obama eliminated the Wet foot / Dry foot" policy to help stop the growing Republican majority in Florida, and Biden has been prioritizing sending back Venezuelans because most of them will likely vote Republican.
He's also totally violating U.S.C. Title 8 § 1601-1604 "RESTRICTING WELFARE AND PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR ALIENS"
There's two things that should be happening, :
1 - These people are denied entry unless they truly are refugees. Biden is allowing them in, and since he cannot change what is and what isn't a refugee, he simply has them assigned a court case. These court cases are being intentionally pushed out over 10 years.
2 - These people are deported as soon as they are deemed not refugees: Instead, Biden eliminates the removal of these people under a specific order that refocuses all efforts on simply those who pose an immediate risk. You can read that here: https://www.ice.gov/doclib/...guidanceApr2022.pdf. Additionally, illegals (who Biden improperly refers as refugees) are ignored... to the point that they're actually "dropping" the cases from the courts, so these people are simply now in the country, not as citizens, no pending court cases, not refugees, nothing. You can read about that here: https://www.ice.gov/about-i...ecutorial-discretion
At what point do you say... ok... maybe he did want as many illegals in as possible. I don't know if it's because he feels bad for them or because he wants more future Democrats... I don't care. Either way, I know that through the language manipulation (calling them refugees, and never having them actually go through the court system to officially deny that), they're entitled to all the benefits of Medicaid, TANF, SNAP, and other welfare entitlements. It's killing our country, and we can neither afford it, or house them.
Me personally, I think Democrats intentionally want to bring about total change in our system of government into one that allows more control at the top... and a more impoverished people who THINK they're going to get taken care of, but will only get misery in the end.
[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 03-29-2024).]
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: Title 42 deals with Public Health and Welfare in the U.S.C., and you're randomly throwing out "Title 42" which literally has thousands and thousands of laws in it, as if that's supposed to mean something. What are you even referring to?
If you don't know what Title 42 means in relationship to immigration at the Southern Border then you are pretty clueless about the entire situation.
Title 42 was the policy Trump was able to use to stop immigration during Covid. Before his Title 42 policy he could not control immigration problems at the border. In 2019 the number of border encounters was the highest it had been in 15 years, and this was with the Migrant Protection Protocols ("stay in Mexico") in place. Trump did not have the border under control at all until he was able to rely on Title 42 due to the pandemic.
But now the policy he used to reduce immigration has been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because the pandemic is over. So even if Trump is re-elected he will not be able to use that policy again.
[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 03-31-2024).]
Nothing you write is true. Let's start with your own name. After that, it is just a child playing cowboys and indians. You ain't Tonto or the Lone Ranger.
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: There's two things that should be happening, :
1 - These people are denied entry unless they truly are refugees. Biden is allowing them in, and since he cannot change what is and what isn't a refugee, he simply has them assigned a court case.
So just do away with all immigration hearings and have the border guards decide who is a refugee?
Nothing you write is true. Let's start with your own name. After that, it is just a child playing cowboys and indians. You ain't Tonto or the Lone Ranger.
Okay lets take these one at a time.
First of all you are claiming that Trump never used a policy formulated under Title 42 in order to keep immigrants out of the United States? Is that correct?
[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 03-31-2024).]
So just do away with all immigration hearings and have the border guards decide who is a refugee?
Actually, it's really easy. No one from Central America is a refugee. No one from South America is a refugee except for Venezuelans. And no one from Haiti (until last month) was a refugee. Also, no one from China is a refugee either, etc.
We're going round and round again, but this is what you do. So I'll repeat myself, because apparently you forget from one day to the next, or this is your silly convoluted idea of what the Socratic Method is. Biden rescinded the "Remain in Mexico" executive order. Had he kept it, and had he continued to build the border wall, and prevent people from coming over.... he could have simply kept them on the other side of the border, and they wouldn't be coming in the numbers that they are. They're coming, because Biden has essentially invited them by saying he's not going to stop them.
First of all you are claiming that Trump never used a policy formulated under Title 42 in order to keep immigrants out of the United States? Is that correct?
You are grossly over-inflating the importance of this. This was something he did to halt ALL immigration during the pandemic.
And can you please cite the actual law? Title 42 incorporates literally 1000s of laws... you act like you're saying something by throwing out "Title 42."
You are grossly over-inflating the importance of this. This was something he did to halt ALL immigration during the pandemic.
And can you please cite the actual law? Title 42 incorporates literally 1000s of laws... you act like you're saying something by throwing out "Title 42."
Fred thinks "Title 42" is some kind of immigration policy, because he heard it on the TV. He is at this very moment discovering eCFR and will be an expert in five minutes.
Fred thinks "Title 42" is some kind of immigration policy, because he heard it on the TV. He is at this very moment discovering eCFR and will be an expert in five minutes.
Yes... exactly this. I'm trying to get him to look it up so he can be really specific (section) about what he's trying to say, since he likely has no idea. And despite the fact he keeps saying we get our influences from "Right Wing News" (despite the fact that I literally don't watch the news at all), he's literally getting all his information from "left wing news," by constantly repeating Title 42 without even knowing what that is.
And can you please cite the actual law? Title 42 incorporates literally 1000s of laws... you act like you're saying something by throwing out "Title 42."
quote
Originally posted by williegoat:
Fred thinks "Title 42" is some kind of immigration policy, because he heard it on the TV. He is at this very moment discovering eCFR and will be an expert in five minutes.
I linkt three articles for you all to educate yourselves on Trumps policy under title 42. Anyone who knows anything about the immigration issue over the last few years knows exactly what I am talking about. It was probably the single most debated issue regarding immigration since Biden took office.
Your ignorance on this subject just proves how completely clueless you are on immigration. Apparently you both have been getting your information from a source that claimed Trumps implementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols was what staunched the flow of immigration in 2020. But the truth is that the MPP were in place for all of 2019 when we had the more immigrants coming across the border in 15 years. It was not until the Title 42 policy was put in place that the immigration stopped. But the SCOTUS has ruled that we can not return to that policy.
... (got it! Cheap labor!)
