Originally posted by BingB: I am just pointing out the only logical conclusion to be derived from your comments.
You admit that you do not like me, yet you can not give a single example of me saying anything offensive or false. So it is pretty clear that the only reason you don't "like" me is because I don't agree with you.
Defending your beliefs against dissent is the brave and honorable thing to do.
Eliminating it through cancel culture is just a cowardly admission of defeat.
My Christian inner self told me the right thing to do, is again, try to help you understand why nobody likes you.
The first thing I need to know, have you ever heard the phrase "It's the economy stupid" ?
What makes you thinks I gave you permission ? You have always believed anything you think.
Sorry that you didn't get my point. I was not really thanking you for giving me permission. I was actually mocking you for using what is called a "loser line". It is a comment people make when they know they have lost and can not say anything else. See also: "Aree to disagree" and "You are too obsessed with being correct".
My Christian inner self told me the right thing to do, is again, try to help you understand why nobody likes you.
The first thing I need to know, have you ever heard the phrase "It's the economy stupid" ?
Thank you so much for your assistance. I have been begging for some examples of my behavior that make people dislike me.
So "yes", I remember that line about the economy from when Clinton beat Bush. What does that have to do with me? Do you think I am the cause of inflation? I am really interested to hear this theory.
Originally posted by BingB: Thank you so much for your assistance. I have been begging for some examples of my behavior that make people dislike me.
So "yes", I remember that line about the economy from when Clinton beat Bush. What does that have to do with me? Do you think I am the cause of inflation? I am really interested to hear this theory.
I have heard many times, way before the internet, "it's you attitude stupid".
I have heard many times, way before the internet, "it's you attitude stupid".
Now we are getting somewhere. "Attitude" is so vague that it can be used to cover the truth. You will be unable to provide any examples of my "bad attitude" and just claim it exists because you say so.
The only problem you have with me is that I disagree with you and post actual facts to prove my points.
Originally posted by BingB: Now we are getting somewhere. "Attitude" is so vague that it can be used to cover the truth. You will be unable to provide any examples of my "bad attitude" and just claim it exists because you say so.
The only problem you have with me is that I disagree with you and post actual facts to prove my points.
Were you born brain dead, or did you spend all of your life killing it ?
Originally posted by BingB: But now the policy he used to reduce immigration has been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because the pandemic is over. So even if Trump is re-elected he will not be able to use that policy again.
That is not true !
quote
Originally posted by BingB: It was not until the Title 42 policy was put in place that the immigration stopped. But the SCOTUS has ruled that we can not return to that policy.
Title 42 was not struck down as "unconstitutional", but the Supreme Court dismissed the case that was filed to try and preserve using Title 42 to control immigration at the Southern Border.
I have cited the decision. I have given the name of the judge.
You can say "not true" all you want but it will not change facts. Neither Biden nor Trump could currently use Title 42 to regulate immigration because there is not any health emergency.
And you can't post anything to back up your position because it is nothing but make believe.
Originally posted by BingB: You can say "not true" all you want but it will not change facts. Neither Biden nor Trump could currently use Title 42 to regulate immigration because there is not any health emergency.
That is also not true. We realize that is just your opinion and that you insist on being ignorant. Because you refuse to do your own research.
quote
Originally posted by BingB: Yes. Everything I said was 100% true.
Title 42 was not struck down as "unconstitutional", but the Supreme Court dismissed the case that was filed to try and preserve using Title 42 to control immigration at the Southern Border.
You said SCOTUS did rule Title 42 was "unconstitutional" .
quote
Originally posted by BingB: And you can't post anything to back up your position because it is nothing but make believe.
I can post many things which prove you wrong, wrong many times. I don't need to. If you ever stop making a fool of yourself, I got your back and will help you along.
.
