Originally posted by cliffw: There it is. Starting a game and changing the rules as he goes along. He must be losing.
Not losing anything and not changing any rules.
Just desperately trying to find someone who is not afraid to answer my question.
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Yes and no. Now answer my question. Don't be afraid.
"Yes and no" is not an answer. But to prove that I am a better man than you I will answer your question.
I believe that any Democrat who has supported expanding the Supreme Court just to get a majority is abo0ut on the same level as Trumps threat here. They are not really calling for a "termination" of the rules of the Constitution, but they are trying to do the same thing a different way.
Originally posted by cliffw: Which party threw out 14 million votes and proclaimed their new dictator ?
quote
Originally posted by BingB: Neither party did that.
What are you talking about? And don't start with this "Do your own research" bull. I know all the issues regarding the 2020 election and there is no evidence of either party throwing out 14 million votes and proclaiming a new dictator.
If there is then post a link to your source.
DungD, the art of the steal. Why are you talking about 2020 ? Someone here proclaimed he was a history teacher. Oh yeah, that would be you.
quote
Originally posted by BingB: Here is what is clear. Candidates who have won delegates before they drop out almost always pledge their delegates to another candidate. Nikki Haley did that this year for Trump, yet I did not hear you squealing about the Republicans throwing away votes for Haley when the delegates she won voted for Trump at the convention.
You are either ignorant or a hypocrite. I'll let you choose.
Are you an ignorant hypocrite ? What candidate dropped out after winning the amount of delegates needed to win the party nomination ? Delegates are not required to vote for those who won their delegate vote. Their delegate vote can not be pledged to someone else, unless they do it themselves.
Originally posted by BingB: "Yes and no" is not an answer.
Yes it is. When Constitutional rules are violated, the gloves are off. Trumps statement was an emotional response. We know, Biden can not mean what he says but Trump has to be. Like bloodbath, dictator day one, good people on both sides, yada yada.
quote
Originally posted by BingB: But to prove that I am a better man than you I will answer your question.
I believe that any Democrat who has supported expanding the Supreme Court just to get a majority is abo0ut on the same level as Trumps threat here. They are not really calling for a "termination" of the rules of the Constitution, but they are trying to do the same thing a different way.
Packing SCOTUS to get a majority is not against the rules of the Constitution, and has been tried before.
Leftoids believe the Constitution is a living document. What does that mean Maynard ?
Are you an ignorant hypocrite ? What candidate dropped out after winning the amount of delegates needed to win the party nomination ? Delegates are not required to vote for those who won their delegate vote. Their delegate vote can not be pledged to someone else, unless they do it themselves.
insult as a Q is a nut-con art form
BTW party's elections are not state run or by state laws they are private
a rump Gop thing is to demand BS they never have a right to we know why your party wanted too throw rocks at the democratic party sound and fury about nothing with cartoons no less
Originally posted by BingB: It does not matter. The current candidate has MORE support than the one that dropped out.
The current candidate never ever got a vote is a primary. She had no support from media, colleagues, or got a vote from a citizen. Biden did not drop out, he was forced out.
Her support is only because the curtain was pulled back showing the public how mentally feeble Biden is.
The current candidate never ever got a vote is a primary. She had no support from media, colleagues, or got a vote from a citizen. Biden did not drop out, he was forced out.
Her support is only because the curtain was pulled back showing the public how mentally feeble Biden is.
Her support is GREATER than there was for Biden.
How can the Democrat voters be victims of theft if the have MORE now than they did before.
Originally posted by BingB: For 150 years candidates were selected without getting votes in primaries.
The system worked for 150 years and they changed it ? Why ?
What you said was that since 1968, 56 years, we have used primaries. Why did it change this year after Biden's mental condition could not be hidden anymore ? "Hide 'n Biden" while true at the time turned out to be prophetic. Now we know why he was kept hidden during the 2020 campaign.
quote
Originally posted by BingB: Her support is GREATER than there was for Biden.
How can the Democrat voters be victims of theft if the have MORE now than they did before.
Just her support among the gears of the Dumb machine, which hold the cogs (voters).
You are right about Democratic voters having more. More stupidity. Camala displayed some when she did her first solo friendly interview, when she could not answer any of the five questions and instead made word salads.
What does it say about Democrat voters who support who they are told to, without them knowing anything about the candidate ?
Now we know why he was kept hidden during the 2020 campaign..
So you are claiming that the Democrats somehow got a benefit from running a less popular candidate first?
I don't see how keeping the best candidate out of the race helped them. They are having to play catch up when they could have been in front all along. The more people find aout about Harris the higher she climbs in the polls.
The way they handled Biden's condition was a huge MISTAKE. It is absurd to claim that is was somehow a strategy that helped the Democrats.
Here is what is clear. Democrats could not have thrown away any votes because they have more now than they did before.
Candidates who have won delegates before they drop out almost always pledge their delegates to another candidate. Nikki Haley did that this year for Trump, yet I did not hear you squealing about the Republicans throwing away votes for Haley when the delegates she won voted for Trump at the convention.
You are either ignorant or a hypocrite. I'll let you choose.
Democrats voted in the primaries for one person - Joe Biden. The choice on the ballots did not say Biden/Harris, as it was a primary for President.
Originally posted by BingB: So you are claiming that the Democrats somehow got a benefit from running a less popular candidate first?
That is an asinine question. How could you be a history teacher if you do not remember last year ? The Democrats loudly proclaimed that Biden was 'the man". They made him the most popular, amongst their sheeple.
Why ?
They did the same thing in 2020. Not even the Dumb's voters were buying it, they wanted comrade Bernie.
quote
Originally posted by BingB:The more people find aout about Harris the higher she climbs in the polls.
Yeah, that's BingBzhit. Higher in the polls ? Why didn't the leftoids insert Harris Embarrass to begin with ? To hide her from needed support ?
Originally posted by cliffw: Why didn't the leftoids insert Harris Embarrass to begin with ?
Because they were stupid.
The plan is that you always go with the incumbent when you have him. That is what BOTH parties generally do. In 2020 The Republicans actually cancelled their primaries in Nevada, South Carolina, and Kansas. Were you squealing about how they were destroying democracy back then because none of them challenged Trump?
Donald Trump posted this in December of 2022 after the story was published explaining Twitter's decision to limit access to a New York Post article, published weeks before the 2020 presidential election, that alleged Hunter Biden tried, in 2015, to arrange a meeting between his father and an executive at a Ukrainian company that Hunter worked for.
"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great "Founders" did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"
So here is what Donald Trump thinks justifying terminating the rules of the US Constitution. The diner was following a fundraiser for the World Food Program USA, a fundraising arm of the U.N. humanitarian organization. At that time Hunter Biden was chairman of World Food Program USA. Among the 10-12 guests were Rick Leach, President and Chief Executive of WFP USA, and Alex Karloutsos, one of the most powerful figures in the Greek Orthodox Church in the United States, and a friend of Joe Biden. Leach and other dinner guests confirmed that the discussion at the table was mainly about the World Food Program, and that Joe Biden was not even a member of the dinner party. He just stopped by briefly to speak with Karloutsos.
So there was nothing to the story that would have effected the way anyone would have voted. Would you be comfortable with the President of the United States suspending the rules of the Constitution just because he claimed an election was not fair?
Democrats coordinated a manipulation of voting rules and laws across all states in 2020, using COVID as a guise to help illegally change and manipulate the laws to the benefit of Democrats. Here are just four of the states in which the state supreme courts ruled that the Democrats had violated election laws by changing them without going through the local legislature:
Keep in mind, in these states, the following changes were illegally made:
- Mass mail-in voting... in some cases, just sending out a ballot to literally everyone who was registered to vote. - Ballot harvesting, as in... allowing people to go door to door and collect ballots on behalf of the political party. - Ballot drop-boxes... allowing people from anywhere to be able to deliver ballots, without any verification. - Waiving registration deadlines - Waiving signature verification - Waiving proof of identity verification
In most of these swing states, Biden won by a few thousand votes... all of which was possible as a direct result of the following manipulation.
Essentially, your claim when I state this is that... the Republicans could have also cheated... or more accurately, the Democrats cheated fair and square. You criticize the Republicans for not taking advantage of the same illegalities that the Democrats did.
Every few weeks, you basically post this exact same kind of thread on Pennock's... I dunno what kind of outcome you're hoping for. But it's the same kind of post with a slight twist each time that is of no consequence. Each time, I show this to you, and your argument is that the Republicans had the equal chance to also cheat. Even though the cheating organizations that made these rule changes (illegally) were all intentioned to support Democrats from the beginning.j
And then we get to the open border. I'm not even sure what your take is on it, but it should be obvious to everyone that the Democrats don't actually care about these people streaming across. They view them as potential future voters... and that's the point. It's all about gaining and maintaining power at any cost. And you are right there helping them.
