Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions
  3.4L Plenum dilemma

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


next newest topic | next oldest topic
3.4L Plenum dilemma by zzzhuh
Started on: 06-26-2015 10:00 PM
Replies: 23 (1883 views)
Last post by: Lou and Blue on 08-31-2015 09:44 AM
zzzhuh
Member
Posts: 826
From: Colorado
Registered: Jan 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-26-2015 10:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for zzzhuhSend a Private Message to zzzhuhEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I am getting a 94 Camaro next week and will be pulling the engine out. I have read that people stated the engine doesn't have much breath after 4500RPM. People have claimed that the engine just doesn't get the air supplies it needs. I am going to install 1.52 rockers with a 260 cam shaft.

Here is my dilemma:

You have a few options with the plenum that you can go with.

A dawg modified Fiero plenum:



Trueleo (not a fan of the look, but if it works good I might have to go with this):



A WCF plenum (This is what I want.)



OR, possibly the best option, a dual throttle body intake that was made by TLG (now known as BTR)




Which one is going to give me the best chance of getting more air into the engine? I have to assume some of you could give me some opinions or even facts that back up your opinion. I appreciate your help, and watch for a build thread soon

------------------
Every fiero has a story, It's our job to keep that story alive.

[This message has been edited by zzzhuh (edited 06-26-2015).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
IMSA GT
Member
Posts: 10484
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 253
Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 12:45 AM Click Here to See the Profile for IMSA GTSend a Private Message to IMSA GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The TLG dual body is a beautiful unit. You can ask Yellowstone on here since he has one on his car. However the last I remember, they made the car run VERY rich and the guys at TLG were working on a solution for that issue. To date, I haven't heard of a fix but I may just be out of the loop.

The one from Francis (Trueleo) is also very nice. It seems to be the favorite because of the larger air canister and intake tubes and makes quite a difference. The throttle response is almost instant.

From what I understand, the one from Dawg also works very well. He improved one of the true weak areas of that plenum and has the same fast throttle response.

I wouldn't waste my time with WCF so no comment on them.
IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 37674
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 464
Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 03:02 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
My goal is to someday try adding a secondary (small) TB onto the passenger side of the stock upper plenum that would start to open only when the primary TB is around 3/4 open (and both would be completely open at full throttle). The secondary TB could be operated with direct linkages, or perhaps (and I like this idea better) with a vacuum control of some sort. IMO, this would bypass the problem with the restrictive stock intake neck and still retain crisp throttle response at lower RPMs.

Go ahead and run with my idea!

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 06-28-2015).]

IP: Logged
Riddick85
Member
Posts: 819
From: Detroit, Michigan, US
Registered: Oct 2005


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 12:19 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Riddick85Send a Private Message to Riddick85Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
My 3.4 pulled very well all the way to 6000 and I had a trueleo, 260 cam, 1.6 full roller rockers, and alot more. I swapped my 3.4 out for a 3800SC so I have my intake for sale if you are interested. Truleo stopped making these so if you wanted to go that route it will be a little harder to find
IP: Logged
f85gtron
Member
Posts: 657
From: Augusta, Ga. USA
Registered: Jul 2013


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 12:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for f85gtronSend a Private Message to f85gtronEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I went with the Dawg mod and a Daniel Morris bored throttle body. The result is instant and great. You might run too lean so watch carefully. In my case, I had to get a new tune, so beware of unforseen expenses.
IP: Logged
fierofool
Member
Posts: 12915
From: Auburn, Georgia USA
Registered: Jan 2002


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 154
Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 01:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierofoolClick Here to visit fierofool's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierofoolEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

My goal is to someday try adding a secondary (small) TB onto the passenger side of the stock upper plenum that would start to open only when the primary TB is around 3/4 open (and both would be completely open at full throttle). The secondary TB could be operated with direct linkages, or perhaps (and I like this idea better) with a vacuum control of some sort. IMO, this would bypass the problem with the restrictive stock intake "throat" and still retain crisp throttle response at lower RPMs.

Go ahead and run with my idea!



Here ya go, Patrick. Set up to only open at part throttle like the secondaries of a 4-barrel carb. He said it's a real kick in the rear when it opens.



IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 02:01 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by f85gtron:

I went with the Dawg mod and a Daniel Morris bored throttle body.

I think you mean Darrel Morse?

Side note: when I upgraded to a Trueleo intake with a bigger throttle body, I noticed the engine was going really lean for a brief moment, every time I hit the gas. I had to increase the acceleration enrichment significantly to adjust for it. A few other things had to be tweaked and tuned too.
IP: Logged
sardonyx247
Member
Posts: 5032
From: Nevada, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score:    (88)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 219
Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 02:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for sardonyx247Click Here to visit sardonyx247's HomePageSend a Private Message to sardonyx247Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The math says the stock one will flow enough for a 3.4.
The biggest thing I found limiting rpm was the stock coil. When I went with really good plug wires and a better coil it pulled harder in the upper rpms, when I went to DIS, pulls till redline.
IP: Logged
f85gtron
Member
Posts: 657
From: Augusta, Ga. USA
Registered: Jul 2013


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 03:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for f85gtronSend a Private Message to f85gtronEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Yup, Darrell Morris.
I'm still having the lean tip-in problem too. I was trying to correct it in ve tables. I'll play with ae table to fix it. Thank
IP: Logged
zzzhuh
Member
Posts: 826
From: Colorado
Registered: Jan 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post06-27-2015 10:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for zzzhuhSend a Private Message to zzzhuhEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by IMSA GT:


I wouldn't waste my time with WCF so no comment on them.


Why do you say this?

 
quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

My goal is to someday try adding a secondary (small) TB onto the passenger side of the stock upper plenum that would start to open only when the primary TB is around 3/4 open (and both would be completely open at full throttle).
Go ahead and run with my idea!



That is a great idea Patrick! The dual throttle body actually had an adjusting screw for the second throttle body, so you probably could make it open the way you would want it to.

Here is the video they uploaded back in 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAR9BMAMEVs

The reason they stopped making this: $2,000 for the intake.... Anyone make these for cheaper? I have seen threads with dual throttle bodies and they looked a little different.

Edit to add: Here is the link, scroll down and you will see it.

[This message has been edited by zzzhuh (edited 06-27-2015).]

IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 37674
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 464
Rate this member

Report this Post06-28-2015 10:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierofool:

Here ya go, Patrick. Set up to only open at part throttle like the secondaries of a 4-barrel carb. He said it's a real kick in the rear when it opens.


Yes, I've seen that one posted previously, and it certainly influenced me! What I don't like about that particular setup however is that you either run with no air filter, or you need to cut a hole in the decklid. That's why I'd like to have the secondary TB connected to the passenger side of the upper intake plenum (probably with a tube of some sort between the plenum and the TB). IMO, the secondary TB also wouldn't have to handle a whole lot of CFM, as it only needs to supplement the airflow that the stock neck of the intake plenum restricts at WOT.

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 06-28-2015).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
IMSA GT
Member
Posts: 10484
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 253
Rate this member

Report this Post06-28-2015 11:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for IMSA GTSend a Private Message to IMSA GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
By the way, I answered your question via PM.....
IP: Logged
fierofool
Member
Posts: 12915
From: Auburn, Georgia USA
Registered: Jan 2002


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 154
Rate this member

Report this Post06-28-2015 11:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierofoolClick Here to visit fierofool's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierofoolEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Patrick, that is a picture I took at the 2007 RFTH. It's Ken Wheeler's GT. I believe he said it was a motorcycle carb. Quite likely since he owns Wheeler Performance Cycles, just south of The Dragon. I suppose a decklid scoop of the Mustang style could be grafted onto the decklid, giving clearance for an air filter. Maybe have the injectors resized to 16 lb for a stock 2.8 so it didn't lean out at high rpm. I wonder how this would be accepted under SCCA rules.
IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 37674
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 464
Rate this member

Report this Post06-29-2015 03:14 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierofool:

Patrick, that is a picture I took at the 2007 RFTH. It's Ken Wheeler's GT...


Charlie, I already know all that. Click

I think the addition of a smaller secondary TB is definitely something worthwhile to try, especially if any other "breathing" areas of the engine have been improved.

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 06-30-2015).]

IP: Logged
IMSA GT
Member
Posts: 10484
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 253
Rate this member

Report this Post06-29-2015 12:42 PM Click Here to See the Profile for IMSA GTSend a Private Message to IMSA GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Ok, so here are some pictures that describe the issue that GM already knew about with the stock intake. Here is a picture of the stock intake. Note the areas that I circled:


Here is the intake on the PPG car that is owned by Fred. GM got smarter here. Notice the areas that are now filled in and opened up inside the plenum for more airflow:


Also notice how the intake is thicker. You can see the weld line:


This is what one of our members named Fierochild did to his. It is almost exact to what they did to the PPG car:


Also enlarged the restricing neck and removed all of the internal runner walls:


Here is the bottom:


And mounted on his car:



You can see he basically did what the Dawg intake improves on the neck end and then modified the plenum more to be like the PPG intake. Also if you notice in my picture of the PPG car's weld line on the bottom of the plenum, it looks to be in the exact location as the bottom picture of Fierochilds weld line.


By the way, here is the bottleneck of the system. This is the intake neck cut down with a 57mm gasket. Notice how much airflow is lost:

[This message has been edited by IMSA GT (edited 06-29-2015).]

IP: Logged
Notorio
Member
Posts: 2980
From: Temecula, CA
Registered: Oct 2003


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-27-2015 07:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for NotorioSend a Private Message to NotorioEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Hot dog, I'm bringing this thread back to life!!

--> Fierochild, how did your modified intake work? Did this use the stock throttle body?

--> zzzhuh, what option did you pick for your 3.4 swap?
IP: Logged
zzzhuh
Member
Posts: 826
From: Colorado
Registered: Jan 2014


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-27-2015 10:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for zzzhuhSend a Private Message to zzzhuhEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Notorio:

Hot dog, I'm bringing this thread back to life!!

--> Fierochild, how did your modified intake work? Did this use the stock throttle body?

--> zzzhuh, what option did you pick for your 3.4 swap?



I saw this at the top of the forums and went "That looks familiar"

I have yet to fully build my 3.4, but I have decided to go with the stock 2.8 plenum. I will however be using the DAWG mod, and customize it as IMSA suggested.
IP: Logged
Notorio
Member
Posts: 2980
From: Temecula, CA
Registered: Oct 2003


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-28-2015 12:05 AM Click Here to See the Profile for NotorioSend a Private Message to NotorioEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Will you be doing that Aluminum work yourself (in which case I am totally jealous) or getting it done by a local shop?
IP: Logged
Raydar
Member
Posts: 40925
From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country.
Registered: Oct 1999


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 460
Rate this member

Report this Post08-28-2015 05:01 PM Click Here to See the Profile for RaydarSend a Private Message to RaydarEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Notorio:
...
--> Fierochild, how did your modified intake work? Did this use the stock throttle body?


Fierochild sold all of his Fieros, so I don't think he'll see this.

The intake worked quite well. He was using Darrell Morse's throttle body, unless I'm mistaken.
His car dynoed 170-something at the wheels, through a Getrag. It was easily 200+ at the crank. This was on a 3.4. I think he had DOHC pistons in it, so it ran a little higher compression. He maybe could have gotten a few more HP out of it with a Trueleo, but he was running SCCA ITB (I believe) and wanted it to look as "stock" as possible.

IP: Logged
NW-Fiero
Member
Posts: 447
From: Pierce County - WA
Registered: Aug 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-28-2015 05:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for NW-FieroSend a Private Message to NW-FieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Here is a write up with test results on my intake and Bored Out TB. I wanted to keep the look of the Fiero engine but get better performance than the GM engineers took the time to design. The restricted area of the plenum was reworked with retention of the EGR hook-up
.

.
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/118417.html
.
Not many have actually had airflow testing completed and Brucepts was up to the challenge.
------------------
Mark
' 85 2m6 3.4PR
In the Great Northwest!

[This message has been edited by NW-Fiero (edited 08-28-2015).]

IP: Logged
BillS
Member
Posts: 643
From:
Registered: Apr 2000


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-29-2015 11:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BillSSend a Private Message to BillSEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Just BTW, the 260 isn't really enough cam to bother with.

If you do the heads and especially attend to the bottlenecks in the exhaust, the 272 cam makes a nice upgrade.

Another alternative to the modded Fiero upper plenum would be the stock late 3.4 part which has better flow to start with.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15190
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post08-29-2015 07:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by zzzhuh:

I am getting a 94 Camaro next week and will be pulling the engine out.
I have read that people stated the engine doesn't have much breath after 4500RPM.
People have claimed that the engine just doesn't get the air supplies it needs.
I am going to install 1.52 rockers with a 260 cam shaft.


When you add boost - the stock intake works fine.

------------------
Calgary time/temp

3.4L Supercharged 87 GT Click me
Super Duty 4 Indy #163 Click me

IP: Logged
Dennis LaGrua
Member
Posts: 15479
From: Hillsborough, NJ U.S.A.
Registered: May 2000


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 329
Rate this member

Report this Post08-30-2015 08:39 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis LaGruaSend a Private Message to Dennis LaGruaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:


When you add boost - the stock intake works fine.

Very true because compressed air will increase air supply dramatically but not everyone is eager to bolt on a turbo. I still feel that its the best solution for overcoming intake restrictions but it can be costly and requires a 2 BAR MAP and a re-engineered ECM program with new fuel tables.
The most economical solution may be to use the Camaro/Firebird 3.4L P/R Plenum and run DIS with the 7730 ECM. Re-wiring the original harness is not very difficult and loads of programming support is available.

------------------
" THE BLACK PARALYZER" -87GT 3800SC Series III engine, custom ZZP /Frozen Boost Intercooler setup, 3.4" Pulley, Northstar TB, LS1 MAF, 3" Spintech/Hedman Exhaust, Autolite 104's, MSD wires, Custom CAI, 4T65eHD w. custom axles, HP Tuners VCM Suite.
"THE COLUSSUS"
87GT - ALL OUT 3.4L Turbocharged engine, Garrett Hybrid Turbo, MSD ign., modified TH125H
" ON THE LOOSE WITHOUT THE JUICE "

IP: Logged
Lou and Blue
Member
Posts: 1349
From: Baldwin,NY,USA
Registered: Dec 2013


Feedback score:    (8)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-31-2015 09:44 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Lou and BlueSend a Private Message to Lou and BlueEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I have 2 fiero 2.8 intake plenums for sale (one engraved) and a middle plenum and LIM if anyone wants to buy them to mod.

PM me if interested

------------------
===Always trying to find time to work on cars===
Louis Duet
Baldwin, Long Island, NY
"My mind spins like helicopter blades." -G. Rossdale
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Blue" <= '85 Fiero GT
3800sc series 2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Boo" <= '81 Delorean DMC-12
VIN #5835
Stock PRV engine
Peugot 604 Intake manifold
Exhaust headers
Anti-3rd brake light

IP: Logged

next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock