| quote | Originally posted by theogre:
This is nothing but same self-justifying junk that people used Propane and Butane for the same job. Saying they are Cheap and even safe for the environmental...code:
R-# what GWP ODP R-290 Propane 3.3 <0(smog) (mean is not ODP problem but it is for Smog) R-600 Butane 4 0
"Ozone Depleting?" in your table is No for both https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_refrigerants (Many other "drop in" replacements are a mix of flammable and/or nonflammable refrigerants. Get MSDS for them to see.) |
|
Exactly, R152a is cheap and safe(r) for the environment; let's all stop to get mad that the option that helps the planet is also cheaper.
Hell, all the contenders for R12 replacement are cheap (Envirosafe which is a hydrocarbon blend IIRC, difluoroethane aka R152a, and R134a); they all cost less than a synthetic oil change.
So, you must be worried about safety- what is "acceptable" to YOU when it comes to safety?
I'm assuming the "Ogre safety threshold" is
ASHRAE 34: A2L since you seem to be totally OK with R1234yf? A unique designation that only exists because of refrigerant lobbying? It only means "
Yes, it is flammable, but the flame travels slightly slower while it's burning"- that's real comforting.
R152a has a higher auto-ignition temperature (454 deg C) than R1234yf (405 deg C), and the same exposure limits (both are lower toxicity with allowable OEL over 400 ppm)
The auto-ignition data suggests to me that R152a is actually harder to light off than the refrigerant in current production cars today, which means either all new cars are rolling bombs, or we're taking this concern too far.
Further alleviating my concern over a sudden fiery death is that my R152a is blended with embitterment so you can smell a leak before the LFL is reached.
OMG SO DANGEROUS GO BOOM! Here's a video of a guy burning R152aHere's my decision tree.
My first choice from a thermodynamics perspective was CARE30 (a zeotropic blend of R290/R600a that gives properties similar to R12) but the high flammability of a hydrocarbon refrigerant was a legit concern, won't argue with you there.
The options left on the table after eliminating the HC refrigerant were R134a and R152a
So, here's why I really like R152a.....
-Lower head pressure in operation! I have AC which is at least as cold as 134, while consuming less horsepower off my accessory belt.
-Did you notice that the latent heat of vaporization is much higher than R134a? Every kg that evaporates through my evaporator takes more cabin heat with it.
-No need to make arrangements to have refrigerant evacuated (or vent R134a to atmosphere illegally) when I yank the engine.
I won't twist your arm into running the stuff- if you enjoy wearing out our rickety old compressors squeezing R134a, by all means.....
[This message has been edited by KurtAKX (edited 08-06-2017).]