Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions
  looking for help figuring out what went wrong with front coil spring replacement

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


next newest topic | next oldest topic
looking for help figuring out what went wrong with front coil spring replacement by Signupacct
Started on: 03-17-2023 04:34 PM
Replies: 17 (506 views)
Last post by: Signupacct on 03-22-2023 12:04 PM
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-17-2023 04:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post


I purchased a 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT V6 recently. It had been lowered by the seller. I have been trying to get it back to oem regarding front coil springs and clearance.

Following a significant amount of phone time and research to identify replacement coil springs that would restore it back to oem, I purchased RC6730 springs through Husky Springs, elsewhere referred to as SMS6730. The specs are as follows: 13.56 inch height out of the box, .05 inch diameter coil wire, 3.4 inch I.D., 9 coil winds, 755 lbs. weight rating.

I also replaced the upper and lower bushings and had The Fiero Store powder coat and install new ball joints along with the new bushings. The bump stops were reduced, by previous owner, by an inch according to overall bumpstop height information from this forum in a different post. So an inch was added back to the lower control arm, in the process of replacing the front coil springs, so the bump stop would hit at approximately the same point as before the car was lowered.

I torqued all the bolts accord to the factory manual. However, the car is now much higher in the front than before and it appears significantly higher than it should be oem.See attached pics.








there is by tape measure 10 inches between ground and side panel or rocker panel and there is 6 1/4 inches between top of front wheel and the opening of the fender. Online resources quoting Pontiac factory service manual reference the ground clearance at 4.3 inches.

And that the wheel to fender gap should be 2.1 inches for the front and 2.5 inches for the rear. When I put the weight of my body , by placing the palms of my hands on the fender and pushing down I dont see the suspension yielding any.

Does anyone know what the oem front coil spring part number is for 87 Fiero GT V6 with A/C? Does anyone know the weight rating or specification for the oem springs for the 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT V6 with aair conditioning. I just want the car back to oem ride height and suspension performance.

Suitability analysis of part number RC6730 and a rating of 755 lbs. is as follows: My references indicate the 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT V6 is about 2940 lbs. with a weight ratio of 52%(rear) 48%(front). 48 percent of 2940 lbs. is 1411.20 lbs and half of that is 705 lbs per side. In some documentation it was said that slighly stiffer springs were put in in 1987 to address body roll and to improve handling. So if the RC6730 is rated at 755 that could conceiveably mean that these are close enough to oem or what was put on the car at the factory.


Some have mentioned that torqueing the lower and upper control arms with wheels fully extended on a hydraulic jack and then letting it down off the jack may be the source of the problem. that those bolts should be tightened and torqued while suspension is bearing the weight of the front end. I am also told that springs will not be expected to settle more than a 1/2 or so after driving it a bit. It would appear that 3 to 4 inches of settling would be needed.

Thoughts, suggestions, feedback and answers to the questions posted above would be greatly appreciated. And yes I have read archived posts, including references to Chevette springs, however I have not found any posting where after replacing the front coil springs as I have resulted in what appears to be a front suspension that is fully extended and riding at the top of its travel.


Joe k
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Tha Driver
Member
Posts: 4559
From: S.E. USA
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score:    (46)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 204
Rate this member

Report this Post03-17-2023 04:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tha DriverClick Here to visit Tha Driver's HomePageSend a Private Message to Tha DriverEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Did you use rubber control arm bushings? If so, you have to tighten them with weight on the car. If you tighten them with the control arm at full drop, they will hold the car up.
HTH,
~ Paul
aka "Tha Driver"
IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-17-2023 05:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post


yes

I used rubber bushings and yes I tightened them while fully extended

ok

so what is the proper protocol then

put hydraulic jack underneath lower control arm and tighten to torque spec ?

then lower off jack ?

if the tightening makes the lower control arm stay up will tightening when under load hold it down so it will not extend upward if needed ?

and if so is that ok and for how long will it stay that way, so stiff the suspension does not easily travel

Joe k
IP: Logged
fieroguru
Member
Posts: 12275
From: Champaign, IL
Registered: Aug 2003


Feedback score:    (45)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 259
Rate this member

Report this Post03-17-2023 06:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for fieroguruSend a Private Message to fieroguruEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Two most common reasons....
1. Bottom end of the spring is not in the recessed pocket on the lower control are.
2. Torquing the control arm bushings at full droop. Rest the wheels on blocks under weight and tighten the bushing bolts.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15188
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post03-18-2023 07:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I think the problem is the 755# spring rating (too stiff).
Does the car move at all when you throw your body on it?

I needed to raise my front a bit too because I had 1-inch lowering spindles AND the old springs were worn out.
The problem was fixed with NEW Chevette springs which were still available.
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/...120111-2-110255.html




------------------
My World of Wheels Winners (Click on links below)

3.4L Supercharged 87 GT and Super Duty 4 Indy #163

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 03-20-2023).]

IP: Logged
fieroguru
Member
Posts: 12275
From: Champaign, IL
Registered: Aug 2003


Feedback score:    (45)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 259
Rate this member

Report this Post03-18-2023 09:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fieroguruSend a Private Message to fieroguruEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Pretty sure the 755 lbs is the load rating not the spring rate. I doubt they could be installed with a 755 lb/in spring rate.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15188
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 286
Rate this member

Report this Post03-18-2023 09:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fieroguru:

Pretty sure the 755 lbs is the load rating not the spring rate. I doubt they could be installed with a 755 lb/in spring rate.



Gotcha. I missed the load vs rate...

Also, not clear on the modification to lower control arm he mentions...


 
quote
Originally posted by Signupacct:

he bump stops were reduced, by previous owner, by an inch according to overall bumpstop height information from this forum in a different post. So an inch was added back to the lower control arm, in the process of replacing the front coil springs, so the bump stop would hit at approximately the same point as before the car was lowered.

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 03-18-2023).]

IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2023 10:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
ok

I realize that I was not as specific as I needed to be in regards to modifications to the lower control arm to make up for the reduction in the bump stop cone. By consulting the forum in regards to oem bump stop height it was determined that 1 inch was removed and then cone rewelded and the rubber stop was in place as before. So I took a stack of fender washers and I drilled a hole in the lower control arm in the center of where the spring is cradled. I used a aircraft or nylox stainless steel nut on a stainless steel bolt. It is positioned right in the center of where the bump stop would hit. So there is a stack of 1 inch high stack of fender washers in the center of the lower control arm where the spring is cradled. The bump stop would come down and hit the washer stack an inch earlier which would make up for the bump stop cone being an inch shorter.

This solution seemed better than trying to reweld the shortened bump stop back to oem height while in place or remove it and reweld it and re install or find oem bump stops and remove the shortened ones and install oem's

If I can find my pics of this I will post later, can't easily find them at the moment

[This message has been edited by Signupacct (edited 03-19-2023).]

IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2023 11:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

Signupacct

57 posts
Member since Sep 2022



here are the numbers related to the RC6730 springs that were recommended by the engineer for the vendor.


SMS6730 187.5 / 755 9.63 / 13.56


13.5 inches high uninstalled

half inch radius rod to make coil

3.4 inch inside diameter

9 coil winds
as for other springs that were discussed before the RC6730 was decided and sent


SMS6556 197 / 808 9.63 / 13.75

SMS6558 197 / 861 9.63 / 14.06


I believe the last number is the height uninstalled and 9.63 is installed ? maybe
IP: Logged
Rick Vanderpool
Member
Posts: 234
From: Columbia, SC
Registered: Aug 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2023 11:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rick VanderpoolSend a Private Message to Rick VanderpoolEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Looking at the specs of the spring you listed it has a spring rate of 1501 lb/in. That means that it would only compress 1/2 inch when you put the weight on it, based on the car weight calculated. It is way too stiff.
IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2023 11:24 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post


help me to understand your calculations and conclusion that the 6730 is too stiff

I am not asking for any other reason than to learn something regarding this

the SMS6730 or I may have referenced in previous posts as RC6730 but the same spring the prefix letters I think are unique to the vendor

thank you in advance

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Rick Vanderpool
Member
Posts: 234
From: Columbia, SC
Registered: Aug 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-20-2023 12:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rick VanderpoolSend a Private Message to Rick VanderpoolEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Your indicated you bought RC6730 from Husky, so I looked up that item. Here is the page listing the specs for that spring.
https://www.huskyspring.com/Home/ProductDetail
The spring rate for that spring is 1501 pounds per inch, which means it takes 1501 pounds to compress the spring 1 inch. your calculations put each front corner at 705 lbs., which would result in a compression of less than 1/2 in. There are other factors which affect spring rate calculations but they would all reduce the required rate.
Having said all that, the evidence that this is the issue is the fact that the car sits way to high and doesn't move down when you sit on it.
Rick

The link doesn't go directly to the spring in question. Put RC6730 in the search box and select the item that is listed. them click on the specifications tab.

[This message has been edited by Rick Vanderpool (edited 03-20-2023).]

IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-21-2023 02:16 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
well

the selection of the RC6730 was not a casual process and was led to believe that was going to meet the specifications for the car

as I double check the process I can see that somehow the process broke down

the 6730 spring according to Husky is the lightest for a chevy chevette with no a/c as the 6556 and 6558 are rated even heavier


the 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT with a V6 and a/c was pretty common

so how would you recommend determining the proper spring specs and also specs for what was oem (such as spring coil wire diameter, inside diameter, number of coil winds, uninstalled height, spring rate per inch)

I did find the following number 10034101FJF but I am unable to convert that to any specifications or to currently available spring part number.

obviously I thought I did but maybe not








[This message has been edited by Signupacct (edited 03-21-2023).]

IP: Logged
PhatMax
Member
Posts: 562
From: Peotone, IL. USA
Registered: Apr 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-21-2023 03:52 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PhatMaxSend a Private Message to PhatMaxEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-21-2023 10:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
great read

unfortunately it references a car way lighter than mine and no specific mention of oem spring part numbers for a 1987 pontiac fiero gt v6 with a/c

appreciate the mention

still hoping someone has an idea what the oem part number is for the front coil springs and the specs for those springs such as

diameter of the coil wire, the inside diameter, the uninstalled height, the rate per inch, how many winds


the best I have for oem part number is the 10034101FJF but have no more information than that

oem specifications would help identify other aftermarket springs that might work

[This message has been edited by Signupacct (edited 03-21-2023).]

IP: Logged
PhatMax
Member
Posts: 562
From: Peotone, IL. USA
Registered: Apr 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-22-2023 05:24 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PhatMaxSend a Private Message to PhatMaxEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Perhaps this company has the spring rates on file. I know they can make whatever you need.

Kevin Crane
Coil Springs Specialties
PBX "G"
632 W. Bertrand Avenue
Saint Mary's, KS 66536
785-437-2025
IP: Logged
fieroguru
Member
Posts: 12275
From: Champaign, IL
Registered: Aug 2003


Feedback score:    (45)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 259
Rate this member

Report this Post03-22-2023 05:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fieroguruSend a Private Message to fieroguruEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Signupacct:
still hoping someone has an idea what the oem part number is for the front coil springs and the specs for those springs such as

diameter of the coil wire, the inside diameter, the uninstalled height, the rate per inch, how many winds


Looks like you have the original springs out, so all you need to do is measure them to get the needed information to calculate the spring rate. It will be about 200 lb/in +/- 10%.
https://www.thespringstore....rate-calculator.html

You can do the same with your new springs to verify the rate.
IP: Logged
Signupacct
Member
Posts: 57
From: North texas
Registered: Sep 2022


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-22-2023 12:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SignupacctSend a Private Message to SignupacctEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
great suggestions both

unfortunately as for measuring the springs that came out the previous owner that I purchased it from lowered it

and cut some off

also it appears that the husky catalogue and the numbers appear suspiciously wrong

someone in previous post suggested that by the specs in the husky catalogue and the phone rep that the springs inch rate was twice what it needed to be but i asked husky to double check their numbers becuase they dont agree with the 6730 springs they shipped

I will reach out to the suggested spring sources and see what they have


stay tuned

[This message has been edited by Signupacct (edited 03-22-2023).]

IP: Logged

next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock