In 2011 there were 58 murders with firearms in Great Britain and 8775 in the US.
There are also five times the number of people in the US and more cities for people to be concentrated in. Just an observation, but it would seem that the more concentrated the population of an area is, the bigger the risk you have for crime and violence.
What people don't understand other countries have not ever had the number of firearms that the USA has had. Than they banned, registered and confiscated them because it is not in their founding of their countries. I don't care which country you pick none are as free as the USA in what you may own, where you can go and do. And when you even free up what firearm you can carry crime does go down. Just look at this from a city that never would let you even have a firearm legally Chicago.
Originally posted by Csjag: ... just looking for comments on why this might be
To me, every murder is unfathomable. They all also have many differing factors. I would say they all involve emotions. Your comparison also does not compare apples to apples. A per capita number would be a better guage, as well as a ratio of the number of guns available to the number of murders. It would also help to have a ratio of other type murders per capita, to see if there is any correlation.
What people don't understand other countries have not ever had the number of firearms that the USA has had. Than they banned, registered and confiscated them because it is not in their founding of their countries. I don't care which country you pick none are as free as the USA in what you may own, where you can go and do. Earl
Well...Unless you count our prison population... The only thing we lead the world in, including freedom.
The country doesn't start getting better until we stop living in a dream world, and spreading mistruths Earl.
Brad
[This message has been edited by Fats (edited 08-28-2014).]
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
If you honestly thought that posting items like that would not cause controversy, then you have the intelligence of a turnip.
Of course you knew what you were doing. I think they call it 'trolling' in other circles.
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
How do you feel you were insulted? Can you quote the post that insulted you personally?
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
I posted the number of murders by firearm's in the US in 2011 versus the number of murders by firearm's in Great Britain in 2011 never thinking that it would cause such sarcasm and personal insults. I am sure some of you will be happy to know that I will not be posting in OT anymore. You can go ahead and continue your personal insults and labeling of everyone.
I didn't see anything resembling a personal insult until maybe after you posted the above. Sarcasm? You were maybe expecting something else from this forum? If what I saw is enough for you to take your ball and go home, you need to suck it up buttercup and go see your dermatologist and ask for a thickening agent. If you post something like you did on a forum like this, what were you expecting? For everyone to rally to your support? Or did you just want to stir it up and got caught off guard when you didn't "own" everyone with your obvious display of superior intelligence?
I didn't see anything resembling a personal insult until maybe after you posted the above. Sarcasm? You were maybe expecting something else from this forum? If what I saw is enough for you to take your ball and go home, you need to suck it up buttercup and go see your dermatologist and ask for a thickening agent. If you post something like you did on a forum like this, what were you expecting? For everyone to rally to your support? Or did you just want to stir it up and got caught off guard when you didn't "own" everyone with your obvious display of superior intelligence?
With our track record around here ( me included, not tossing stones ), i barely saw any sarcasm either....
I didn't seen any insults here from the initial posts, or the original comments. That having been said, there may have been other communication in the form of PMs or email. I posted a comment in another thread, and received a whole bunch of PMs with the exact same content, from different members, as well as a few unique messages. Every message called me names. No one else saw these. It was uncalled for. I don't know what did or didn't happen here, but let's not go too far.
Regardless of what/where/who.. if one does not have a thick skin, then its best not to stir the pot.
It sure as hell would be fun trying, depanding on what she is chambered for.....oh, you meant the girl. NONE of us can afford ANY of them, but that never stopped us before.