quote Originally posted by rinselberg: I couldn't care less if my online forum or message board posts are literally littered with links (http links) and linkages to left-leaning or solidly leftist authors and sources.

That is abundantly apparent, particularly since that is the ONLY thing you have posted.

AND, shall we go back over the question you so obviously IGNORED...AGAIN?

"With a smile of Christian muslim charity great Casey's rinselberg's visage shone;
He stilled the rising tumult; he bade the game go on;
He signaled to the pitcher, and once more the spheroid flew;
But Casey rinselberg still ignored it, and the umpire said, "Strike two."


This aint' Mudville but you sure are looking a lot like Casey.

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-16-2015).]

Are you saying that you want me to "confess" that I have some strategy that connects this U.S. nuclear weapons discussion that I started here with anything that I have posted (or have in my "pipeline") about the tentative international agreement with Iran on Iran's nuclear programs?

The answer is no. That connectivity has not been there in the conscious part of my mind. I'm sure of it.

You referred to the image that I posted (the projection of radioactive impact zones from computer-simulated nuclear strikes on the Fordow site in Iran) using the phrase "moral equivalency"..? Maybe I misunderstood. I am talking about this:

quote Perhaps it was the ill-conceived Leftist / Liberal "moral equivalency" argument, this time in regard to nuclear weaponry, and by inference, to The Islamic Republic of Iran that you vainly hoped to avoid "polemics" on, or even any notice of?

No. Absolutely not. There is nothing in the conscious part of my mind that would defame or slander any U.S. nuclear weapons capabilities (current or projected) downwards to the same abhorrent level, in terms of morality or rightfulness, as any nuclear weapons threat that could emanate from the Islamic Republic of Iran.

What about the subconscious levels of my persona? You are venturing to examine me using the "eyes" of Sigmund Freud? I don't think that this has any possibility of being "productive". I think this would present the very same kind of quandaries as theoretical physicists run up against in assessing the scientific merits of String Theory. Could you present any falsifiable hypotheses to examine, in order to deconstruct me at any of my subconscious levels?

I think not.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-16-2015).]

So, did I finally "nail it" as far as this persistent questioning about whether it was only a coincidence that I started this thread about a U.S. nuclear weapons upgrade just four working days after randye lodged his latest objections (direct access via the Blue Turban link, below) to the President's so-called "Iran deal"..?

This is the second time that I have responded directly to this question; the first was back on Page One of this thread (start at the top and text search for "Wolf").

Or will the pundits continue to say that I started this U.S. nuclear weapons related discussion with the express purpose of using it as a way to launch some kind of "sneak attack" against opponents of the President's Iran deal?

What say you?


Direct access to Iran nuclear agreement discussion, courtesy of Blue Turban Productions^©
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/F...HTML/113048.html#p38

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-17-2015).]